The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching the Human Dimensions of Care in Clinical Settings
Abstract
Despite repeated calls to emphasize the humanistic dimensions of care during medical education, these are few known techniques for effective teaching of humanism. We describe the barriers that inhibit humanistic teaching and suggest pragmatic teaching methods to overcome such barriers and teach humanistic care in clinical settings. We began by asking participants at a conference on patient-physician communications sponsored by the American Academy on Physician and Patient in June 1998, "What can we do in the patient's presence to improve and teach the human dimensions of care? Please provide one or more examples of approaches you found to be effective." We augmented this information with suggestions from a number of colleagues in other settings. In a series of iterations, we analyzed all their suggestions to identify key teaching methods. We found that barriers to teaching humanism largely consist of elements of the informal and hidden curricula in medical schools. We then defined methods to help teachers overcome these barriers. Specific methods fall into the 3 categories of taking advantage of seminal events, role modeling, and using active learning skills. We believe that formal courses and other well-motivated endeavors that take place away from patients fail to foster humanistic care. In contrast, we present pragmatic teaching methods that can be used in the fast-paced setting of the clinical environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Bedside Case Presentations on Patients' Perceptions of Their Medical Care
Lehmann, L. S., Brancati, F. L., Chen, M.-C., Roter, D., & Dobs, A. S. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704173361606 · Cited by 243
The Physiologic and Psychological Effects of the Bedside Presentation
Simons, R. J., Baily, R. G., Zelis, R., & Zwillich, C. W. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198911023211821 · Cited by 82
PATIENTS' ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR IN WARD ROUND TEACHING
ROMANO, J. (1941) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1941.02820350004002 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Solet, D. J., Norvell, J. M., Rutan, G. H., & Frankel, R. M. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200512000-00005 · Cited by 531
The Hidden Curricula of Medical Education: A Scoping Review
Lawrence, C., Mhlaba, T., Stewart, K. A., Moletsane, R., Gaede, B., & Moshabela, M. (2018) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002004 · Cited by 312
Wald, H. S., Davis, S. W., Reis, S. P., Monroe, A. D., & Borkan, J. M. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a8592f · Cited by 174
Family-Centered Rounds on Pediatric Wards: A PRIS Network Survey of US and Canadian Hospitalists
Mittal, V. S., Sigrest, T., Ottolini, M. C., Rauch, D., Lin, H., Kit, B., Landrigan, C. P., & Flores, G. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2364 · Cited by 160
Alder, J., Christen, R., Zemp, E., & Bitzer, J. (2007) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-007-0399-0 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Branch, Jr.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-09-05
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1067
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1992955521
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching the Human Dimensions of Care in Clinical Settings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.286.9.1067
- The paper
- Branch, Jr. (2001). Teaching the Human Dimensions of Care in Clinical Settings. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.9.1067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.