Cited by 62Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisParathyroid Disorders and Treatments

Improving the Quality of Hemodialysis Treatment: A Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial to Overcome Patient-Specific Barriers

Sehgal, Ashwini R., Leon, Janeen B., Siminoff, Laura A., Singer, Mendel E., Bunosky, Lisa M., Cebul, Randall D.·2002·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Mortality rates among US hemodialysis patients are the highest in the industrialized world at 23% per year. Measures of dialysis dose (Kt/V) correspond strongly with survival and are inadequate in one sixth of patients. Inadequate dialysis is also associated with increased hospitalizations and high inpatient costs. Our previous work identified 3 barriers to adequate hemodialysis: dialysis underprescription, catheter use, and shortened treatment time. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a tailored intervention on adequacy of hemodialysis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Community-based randomized controlled trial with recruitment from April 1999 to June 2000 at 29 hemodialysis facilities in northeast Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four nephrologists and their 169 randomly selected adult patients receiving inadequate hemodialysis. INTERVENTION: Nephrologists were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 21) or control (n = 23) group. For patients in the intervention group (n = 85), depending on the barrier(s) present, a study coordinator gave nephrologists recommendations about optimizing dialysis prescriptions, expedited conversion of catheters to surgically created grafts or fistulas, and educated patients about the importance of compliance with treatment time. Patients in the control group (n = 84) continued to receive usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in Kt/V and specific barriers after 6 months. RESULTS: At baseline, intervention and control patients had similar Kt/V measurements, specific barriers, and demographic and medical characteristics. After 6 months, intervention patients had 2-fold larger increases in Kt/V compared with control patients (+0.20 vs +0.10; P<.001) and were more likely to achieve their facility Kt/V goal (62% vs 42%; P =.01). Intervention patients also had nearly 3-fold larger increases in dialysis prescription (+0.16 vs +0.06; P<.001) and were 4 times more likely to change from use of catheters to use of fistulas/grafts (28% vs 7%; P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: An intervention tailored to patient-specific barriers resulted in increased hemodialysis dose. Extending this approach to the 33 000 persons in the United States receiving inadequate hemodialysis may substantially enhance patient survival, diminish hospitalizations, and decrease inpatient expenditures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.287.15.1961

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Twenty-three of the included studies had been included in the previous version of the review, but three studies from that review were excluded because their interventions were not assessed as meeting the criteria for tailoring.

    “Twenty‐three of the studies had been included in the previous version of the review, but we excluded three studies from that review because the interventions were not assessed on this occasion as meeting the criteria for tailoring (Davies 2002; Sehgal 2002; Verhoeven 2005).”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Sehgal 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sehgal, A. R., Leon, J. B., Siminoff, L. A., Singer, M. E., Bunosky, L. M., & Cebul, R. D.
Affiliations
  • MetroHealth (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2002-04-17
Volume
287
Issue
15
Pages
1961
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2086060425
Cited by
62
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK051472, DK 54178, DK51472, P50DK054178)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
hemodialysis adequacy, Kt/V, dialysis dose, dialysis prescription, arteriovenous fistula, hemodialysis vascular access, personalized interventions, end-stage renal disease
MeSH terms
Catheters, Indwelling, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Drug Prescriptions, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Quality Control, Quality of Life, Time Factors, Hemodialysis Solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review