The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Over-the-Counter Sales on Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Aids for Smoking Cessation
Abstract
CONTEXT: Successful smoking cessation is a major public health goal. In controlled clinical trials, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and the antidepressant bupropion have been shown to significantly increase cessation rates only for moderate to heavy smokers (> or = 15 cigarettes/d). Nicotine replacement therapy is heavily promoted to the general population by both the pharmaceutical industry and tobacco control advocates. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in smoking cessation, pharmaceutical cessation aid use, and success in cessation in the general California population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The large population-based California Tobacco Surveys of 1992, 1996, and 1999, including 5247 (71.3% response rate), 9725 (72.9% response rate), and 6412 (68.4% response rate) respondents, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of cessation attempts (> or = 1 day) among smokers in the last year, use of pharmaceutical aids (mostly over-the-counter products since 1996), and cessation success. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1999, cessation attempts among California smokers increased 61.4% (from 38.1% to 61.5%), and NRT use among quitters increased 50.5% (from 9.3% to 14.0%). A total of 17.2% of quitters used NRT, an antidepressant, or both as an aid to cessation in 1999. In 1996 and 1999, the median duration of aid use (14 days) was much less than recommended, and only about 20% of users had adjuvant one-on-one or group behavioral counseling. Use of NRT increased short-term cessation success in moderate to heavy smokers in each survey year. However, a long-term cessation advantage was only observed before NRT became widely available over-the-counter (August 1996). In 1999, no advantage for pharmaceutical aid users was observed in either the short or long term for the nearly 60% of California smokers classified as light smokers (<15 cigarettes/d). CONCLUSION: Since becoming available over the counter, NRT appears no longer effective in increasing long-term successful cessation in California smokers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nortriptyline (6 studies) ( 97 ) 2.3 (1.6, 3.4) 10% (6 – 14) 21% (15, 28) [9% – 36%]”
From Tobacco addiction (2008) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“No significant differences in cessation rates were observed between the recommended 300 mg dose and the 150 mg dose (OR 1.07, 95% CI 09.87, 1.32;) (97).”
From Tobacco addiction (2008) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“Bupropion (31 studies) ( 97 ) 1.9 (1.7, 2.2) 10% (6 – 14) 17% (15, 19) [10% – 26%]”
From Tobacco addiction (2008) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses conducted for clinical trial results show similar odds ratios, ranging from 1.9 to 3.2, across these non-nicotine pharmacotherapies (see Table 8).”
From Tobacco addiction (2008) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“The cessation effects of both nortriptyline and bupropion seem to be independent of their anti-depressant properties as studies show efficacy in populations of smokers with and without depression (97).”
From Tobacco addiction (2008) · cites this paper as [97]
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885
Treating tobacco use and dependence-Clinical practice guideline
Mc, F. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,616
The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans.
Low, L. Y., & Efron, B. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288218 · Cited by 2,752
Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence
(2008) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1627 · Cited by 2,701
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
Stead, L. F., Perera, R., Bullen, C., Mant, D., Hartmann‐Boyce, J., Cahill, K., & Lancaster, T. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub4 · Cited by 2,564
A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation
Jorenby, D. E., Leischow, S. J., Nides, M. A., Rennard, S. I., Johnston, J. A., Hughes, A. R., Smith, S. S., Muramoto, M. L., Daughton, D. M., Doan, K., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903043400903 · Cited by 1,585
Rao, J. N. K., & Scott, A. J. (1984) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346391 · Cited by 1,286
Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General.
Heidel, R. E. (1989) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1973420 · Cited by 1,186
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
Silagy, C., Lancaster, T., Stead, L., Mant, D., & Fowler, G. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub2 · Cited by 972
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
Stead, L. F., Perera, R., Bullen, C., Mant, D., Hartmann‐Boyce, J., Cahill, K., & Lancaster, T. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub4 · Cited by 2,564
Kalkhoran, S., & Glantz, S. A. (2016) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00521-4 · Cited by 895
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
Stead, L. F., Perera, R., Bullen, C., Mant, D., & Lancaster, T. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub3 · Cited by 721
Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation
Hartmann-Boyce, J., Chepkin, S. C., Ye, W., Bullen, C., & Lancaster, T. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub5 · Cited by 697
Williams, G. C., McGregor, H. A., Sharp, D. L., Levesque, C. S., Kouides, R. W., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.91 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierce, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pierce, John P.
- ORCID
- Pierce, John P.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-09-11
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1260
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2046687563
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 12.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Keywords
- smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, over-the-counter nicotine products, bupropion, light smokers, behavioral counseling, tobacco control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antidepressive Agents, California, Counseling, Drug Utilization, Nonprescription Drugs, Ganglionic Stimulants, Humans, Nicotine, Pharmaceutic Aids, Self-Help Groups, Proportional Hazards Models, Smoking Cessation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review