The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy, Even Without Counseling, Remains a Cornerstone of Treatment
Abstract
In this issue of the Journal, Leas and colleagues report results from a prospective observational study of smokers making a quit attempt that concludes, “…the simple provision of pharmaceutical aids to smokers does not appear to be an effective way to increase the proportion who successfully quit for the long term” (1). Despite the rigorous methodological aspects of this study, we believe this conclusion is overstated for three main reasons: the conflicting body of evidence from large effectiveness randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which do not suffer from confounding; residual confounding, particularly by smoker type; and recall bias tending to under capture failed quit attempts that did not involve pharmacotherapy. While this study could bring useful attention to the benefits of counseling, it would be harmful if it discouraged cessation medication use when counseling was unavailable. The investigators analyzed data from the nationally representative Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Study (CPS-TUS) overlap sample featuring two surveys administered to the same individuals one year apart (2002–2003 and 2010–2011). Respondents who were smoking every day or some days at the time of the first survey, and who indicated at follow-up that they had made a quit attempt during the past 12 months, were asked about use of any US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved smoking cessation medications to support the quit attempt. Those who self-reported abstinence for…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The decline in the lung cancer risk after smoking ablation57 is slower than the recovery rate reported here.”
From Longitudinal Analysis of Blood Markers Reveals Progressive Loss of Resilience and Predicts Human Lifespan Limit (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of over-the-counter nicotine replacement
Hughes, J. R., Shiffman, S., Callas, P., & Zhang, J. (2003) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.12.1.21 · Cited by 203
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Leas, 2017, Effectiveness of pharmaceutical smoking cessation aids in a nationally representative cohort of American smokers, J Natl Cancer Inst, 110, 581, 10.1093/jnci/djx240 · DOI
- Anthenelli, 2016, Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial, Lancet., 387, 2507, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Fiore, 2008, Clinical Practice Guidelines. Rockville, 107
- Shiffman, 2008, Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States, Am J Prev Med., 34, 102, 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.033 · DOI
- Caraballo, 2017, Quit methods used by US adult cigarette smokers, 2014-2016, Prev Chronic Dis., 14, E32, 10.5888/pcd14.160600 · DOI · Paper page
- Cunningham, 2016, Effect of mailing nicotine patches on tobacco cessation among adult smokers:, A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med., 176, 184, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7792 · DOI
- Kasza, 2013, Effectiveness of stop-smoking medications: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey, Addiction., 108, 193, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04009.x · DOI
- West, 2007, Is nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation effective in the “real world”? Findings from a prospective multinational cohort study, Thorax., 62, 998, 10.1136/thx.2007.078758 · DOI
- Gilpin, 2006, Population effectiveness of pharmaceutical aids for smoking cessation: What is associated with increased success?, Nicotine Tob Res., 8, 661, 10.1080/14622200600910801 · DOI
- Kotz, 2014, Prospective cohort study of the effectiveness of varenicline versus nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in the “real world.”, BMC Public Health., 14, 1163, 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1163 · DOI
- Alpert, 2013, A prospective cohort study challenging the effectiveness of population-based medical intervention for smoking cessation, Tob Control., 22, 32, 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050129 · DOI
- Hughes, 2012, Effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy—a rebuttal, Addiction., 107, 1527, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03925.x · DOI
- Shiffman, 2009, Light and intermittent smokers: Background and perspective, Nicotine Tob Res., 11, 122, 10.1093/ntr/ntn020 · DOI
- Shiffman, 2012, Characteristics and smoking patterns of intermittent smokers, Exp Clin Psychopharmacol., 20, 264, 10.1037/a0027546 · DOI
- Tindle, 2011, Smoking cessation behavior among intermittent smokers versus daily smokers, Am J Public Health., 101, e1, 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300186 · DOI
- Shiffman, 2007, Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in the “real world.”, Thorax., 62, 930, 10.1136/thx.2007.081919 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pyrkov, T. V., Avchaciov, K., Tarkhov, A. E., Menshikov, L. I., Gudkov, A. V., & Fedichev, P. O. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23014-1 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Tindle, H. A., & Greevy, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-12-21
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 545-546
- ISSN
- 0027-8874
- 1460-2105
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy, Even Without Counseling, Remains a Cornerstone of Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djx246
- The paper
- Tindle, H. A., & Greevy, R. A. (2018). Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy, Even Without Counseling, Remains a Cornerstone of Treatment. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx246