The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clinical Genetic Testing
Abstract
Although direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements for pharmaceuticals have been appearing in the mass media for 20 years, DTC advertisements for genetic testing have only recently appeared. Advertisements for genetic testing can provide both consumers and physicians with information about test availability in an expanding market. However, 3 factors limit the value and appropriateness of advertisements: complex information, a complicated social context surrounding genetics, and a lack of consensus about the clinical utility of some tests. Consideration of several advertisements suggests that they overstate the value of genetic testing for consumers' clinical care. Furthermore, advertisements may provide misinformation about genetics, exaggerate consumers' risks, endorse a deterministic relationship between genes and disease, and reinforce associations between diseases and ethnic groups. Advertising motivated by factors other than evidence of the clinical value of genetic tests can manipulate consumers' behavior by exploiting their fears and worries. At this time, DTC advertisements are inappropriate, given the public's limited sophistication regarding genetics and the lack of comprehensive premarket review of tests or oversight of advertisement content. Existing Federal Trade Commission and Food and Drug Administration regulations for other types of health-related advertising should be applied to advertisements for genetic tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening in the United States
Schwartz, L. M. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.1.71 · Cited by 688
Science and the sources of hype
Caulfield, T., & Condit, C. (2012) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000336533 · Cited by 152
Utility of genetic determinants of lipids and cardiovascular events in assessing risk
Holmes, M. V., Harrison, S., Talmud, P. J., Hingorani, A. D., & Humphries, S. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2011.6 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Gollust, S. E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-10-09
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1762
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2058889117
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clinical Genetic Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.288.14.1762
- The paper
- Gollust, S. E. (2002). Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clinical Genetic Testing. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.14.1762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.