The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Practices Will Most Improve Safety?: Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Patient Safety
Abstract
convertedanissueofgrowingprofessionalaware-ness to one of substantial public concern in a mannerandpaceunprecedentedinmodernexperiencewithmattersof health care quality. The epidemiologic finding that morethan 1 million injuries and nearly 100000 deaths occur inthe United States annually as a result of mistakes in medicalcare came from studies nearly a decade old, but it was newinformationforthepublic,anditresonatedstrongly.Inshortorder, the US Congress initiated hearings and the presidentordered a government-wide feasibility study, which led to asubsequent directive to governmental agencies to imple-menttherecommendationsoftheIOMreport.TheIOMcalledonallpartiestomakeimprovingpatientsafetyanationalpri-ority. In response, physicians, hospitals, and health care or-ganizations have been searching for safe practices and ask-ing what they should do to make health care safer.Anticipating this need, the IOM report also recom-mendedthattheAgencyforHealthcareResearchandQual-ity (AHRQ) determine which safety practices are effectiveand disseminate a list of “best practices” to all clinicians.Responding to this appeal, AHRQ requested the NationalQuality Forum to use a consensus process of experts to de-fine a list of best practices. To inform this process, it alsocommissioned the Evidence-Based Practice Center (EPC),University of California, San Francisco–Stanford Univer-sity, to evaluate the evidence supporting a long list of pro-posedsafetypractices.Givena6-monthtimeframe,theEPCenlistednumerousexpertsnationwidetoconducttheanaly-ses. The resulting report by Shojania and colleagues
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction
Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207233270406 · Cited by 1,140
The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems
Reason, J. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0090 · Cited by 762
A systems approach to organizational error
REASON, J. (1995) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139508925221 · Cited by 340
Cited by
Effect of Reducing Interns' Work Hours on Serious Medical Errors in Intensive Care Units
Landrigan, C. P., Rothschild, J. M., Cronin, J. W., Kaushal, R., Burdick, E., Katz, J. T., Lilly, C. M., Stone, P. H., Lockley, S. W., Bates, D. W., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041406 · Cited by 1,760
Self-citationClassen, D. C., Resar, R., Griffin, F., Federico, F., Frankel, T., Kimmel, N., Whittington, J. C., Frankel, A., Seger, A., & James, B. C. (2011) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190 · Cited by 1,027
Costs and benefits of health information technology.
Shekelle, P. G., Morton, S. C., & Keeler, E. B. (2006) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepcerta132 · Cited by 501
Measuring errors and adverse events in health care
Thomas, E. J., & Petersen, L. A. (2003) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20147.x · Cited by 455
Checklists to Reduce Diagnostic Errors
Ely, J. W., Graber, M. L., & Croskerry, P. (2011) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31820824cd · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Leape, L. L., Berwick, D. M., & Bates, D. W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-07-24
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 501
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2163974575
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Practices Will Most Improve Safety?: Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Patient Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.288.4.501
- The paper
- Leape, L. L., Berwick, D. M., & Bates, D. W. (2002). What Practices Will Most Improve Safety?: Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Patient Safety. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.4.501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.