Cited by 511Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDoping in SportsPharmacological Effects and Assays

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy and Safety of Ephedra and Ephedrine for Weight Loss and Athletic Performance: A Meta-analysis

Open access

Abstract

Context: Ephedra and ephedrine sometimes are used for weight loss or enhanced athletic performance, but the efficacy and safety of these compounds are uncertain. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of ephedra and ephedrine used for weight loss and enhanced athletic performance. Data Sources: We searched 9 databases using the terms ephedra , ephedrine , adverse effect , side effect , efficacy , effective , and toxic . We included unpublished trials and non–English-language documents. Adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration MedWatch program were assessed. Study Selection: Eligible studies were controlled trials of ephedra or ephedrine used for weight loss or athletic performance and case reports of adverse events associated with such use. Eligible studies for weight loss were human studies with at least 8 weeks of follow-up; and for athletic performance, those having no minimum follow-up. Eligible case reports documented that ephedra or ephedrine was consumed within 24 hours prior to an adverse event or that ephedrine or an associated product was found in blood or urine, and that other potential causes had been excluded. Of the 530 articles screened, 52 controlled trials and 65 case reports were included in the adverse events analysis. Of more than 18 000 other case reports screened, 284 underwent detailed review. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently identified trials of efficacy and safety of ephedra and ephedrine on weight loss or athletic performance; disagreements were resolved by consensus. Case reports were reviewed with explicit and implicit methods. Data Synthesis: No weight loss trials assessed duration of treatment greater than 6 months. Pooled results for trials comparing placebo with ephedrine (n = 5), ephedrine and caffeine (n = 12), ephedra (n = 1), and ephedra and herbs containing caffeine (n = 4) yielded estimates of weight loss (more than placebo) of 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.0), 1.0 (0.7-1.3), 0.8 (0.4-1.2), and 1.0 (0.6-1.3) kg/mo, respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not substantially alter the latter 3 results. No trials of ephedra and athletic performance were found; 7 trials of ephedrine were too heterogeneous to synthesize. Safety data from 50 trials yielded estimates of 2.2- to 3.6-fold increases in odds of psychiatric, autonomic, or gastrointestinal symptoms, and heart palpitations. Data are insufficient to draw conclusions about adverse events occurring at a rate less than 1.0 per thousand. The majority of case reports are insufficiently documented to allow meaningful assessment. Conclusions: Ephedrine and ephedra promote modest short-term weight loss (≈0.9 kg/mo more than placebo) in clinical trials. There are no data regarding long-term weight loss, and evidence to support use of ephedra for athletic performance is insufficient. Use of ephedra or ephedrine and caffeine is associated with increased risk of psychiatric, autonomic, or gastrointestinal symptoms, and heart palpitations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.289.12.1537

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Abrahamson, 2001, Wheeler used supplement., Los Angeles Times
  2. Carey, 2001, Risks of ephedra usage in spotlight., Los Angeles Times
  3. Marsa, 2002, A tug of war in a larger battle: ephedra is now under intense scrutiny., Los Angeles Times
  4. Moheb, 1998, Effect of ephedrine, caffeine, and aspirin, in combinations of weight loss in obese women [abstract]., Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 22, S264
  5. Colker, 2001, A pilot study evaluating the effects of an ephedrine and forskolin-based product on body weight and body composition in overweight, healthy women [abstract]., J Am Coll Nutr, 20, 98
  6. Jensen, 1980, Elsinore tablets and ephedrine as slimming agents [in Danish]., Ugeskr Laeger, 142, 1499
  7. Kettle, 1998, Ephedrine/caffeine enhances abdominal fat loss in females., Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 22, S264
  8. Lumholtz, 1980, Ephedrine in the treatment of obesity [in Danish]., Ugeskr Laeger, 142, 1487
  9. Quaade, 1992, The effect of an ephedrine/caffeine combination as a supplement to a weight-reducing diet [in Danish]., Ugeskr Laeger, 154, 1258
  10. Roed, 1980, Elsinore banting tablets [in Danish]., Ugeskr Laeger, 142, 1491
  11. Breum, 1994, Comparison of an ephedrine/caffeine combination and dexfenfluramine in the treatment of obesity., Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 18, 99
  12. Not Available, 2001, >Stata [computer program].
  13. Not Available, 2000, StatXact 4 [computer program].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 511

Metadata

Authors
Shekelle, P. G., Hardy, M. L., Morton, S. C., Maglione, M., Mojica, W. A., Suttorp, M. J., Rhodes, S. L., Jungvig, L., & Gagné, J.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2003-03-26
Volume
289
Issue
12
Pages
1537
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1999289755
Cited by
511
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • U.S. Public Health Service (290-97-0001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
Ephedra, ephedrine, weight loss, athletic performance, stimulants, caffeine, adverse events, drug safety, efficacy, herbal supplements, performance-enhancing drugs
MeSH terms
Caffeine, Ephedrine, Humans, Physical Endurance, Risk, Sports, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Anti-Obesity Agents, Dietary Supplements, Plant Preparations, Ephedra

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review