The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current and Emerging Infectious Risks of Blood Transfusions
Abstract
THE BLOOD SUPPLY IN THE UNITED States and other developed countries has never been as safe as it is now. During the past several decades, there have been dramatic progressive reductions in the risk of transfusion-transmitted clinically significant blood-borne infections. This has been accomplished as a result of extensive research to characterize transfusiontransmitted pathogens, development of strategies to measure infection rates in blood donor and recipient populations, characterization of the dynamics of early viremia, and implementation of progressively more restrictive donor eligibility criteria and increasingly sensitive laboratory screening methods. In addition, regulatory oversight by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been strengthened, resulting in enhanced quality assurance programs in blood collection and transfusion facilities. Pathogen reduction methods, already successfully applied to pooled plasma derivatives (eg, albumin, clotting factor concentrates, immunoglobulin preparations) are now in development for cellular blood components and fresh-frozen plasma. If these methods are approved by the FDA and widely implemented, they could virtually eliminate the risk of transmission by transfusions of both known and emerging infectious agents in technologically advanced countries. This progress needs to be balanced against the continued emergence of potential new transfusiontransmissible pathogens and the disparity in blood safety in developing countries where resources are insufficient to enable basic infectious disease donor screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection
Shepard, C. W., Finelli, L., & Alter, M. J. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70216-4 · Cited by 2,758
Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?
Plebani, M. (2006) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm.2006.123 · Cited by 734
Grillberger, L., Kreil, T. R., Nasr, S., & Reiter, M. (2009) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.200800241 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Busch, M. P., Kleinman, S. H., & Nemo, G. J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-02-26
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 959
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2030868440
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 75.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current and Emerging Infectious Risks of Blood Transfusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.289.8.959
- The paper
- Busch, M. P., Kleinman, S. H., & Nemo, G. J. (2003). Current and Emerging Infectious Risks of Blood Transfusions. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.8.959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.