Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efalizumab for Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gordon, Kenneth B., Papp, Kim A., Hamilton, Tiffani K., Walicke, Patricia A., Dummer, Wolfgang, Li, Nicole, Bresnahan, Brian W., Menter, Alan, for the Efalizumab Study Group·2003·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Because T-cell interactions are involved in the pathophysiology of psoriasis, therapy with a T-cell modulator may have beneficial effects on psoriasis severity and health-related quality of life (HRQL). OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of efalizumab, a T-cell modulator, in patients with plaque psoriasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial involving 556 adult patients with stable, moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and conducted at 30 study centers in the United States and Canada between January and July 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive 12 weekly doses of subcutaneous efalizumab, 1 mg/kg (n = 369), or placebo equivalent (n = 187). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At least 75% improvement on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75); improvement on the overall Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Itching Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Psoriasis Symptom Assessment (PSA) at week 12 vs baseline. RESULTS: Efalizumab-treated patients experienced significantly greater improvement on all end points than placebo-treated patients. Twenty-seven percent of efalizumab-treated patients achieved PASI-75 vs 4% of the placebo group ( P<.001). Efalizumab-treated patients exhibited significantly greater mean percentage improvement than placebo-treated patients on the overall DLQI (47% vs 14%; P<.001), Itching VAS (38% vs -0.2%; P<.001), and PSA frequency and severity subscales (48% vs 18% and 47% vs 17%, respectively; P<.001 for both) at the first assessment point. Efalizumab was safe and well tolerated, with primarily mild to moderate adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this 12-week study, efalizumab resulted in significant improvements in clinical end points, including physician-assessed and dermatology-specific patient-reported HRQL measures, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.290.23.3073

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Gordon, K. B., Papp, K. A., Hamilton, T. K., Walicke, P. A., Dummer, W., Li, N., Bresnahan, B. W., Menter, A., & for the Efalizumab Study Group
Venue
JAMA
Published
2003-12-17
Volume
290
Issue
23
Pages
3073
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2034585843
Cited by
391
References
31
FWCI
14.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efalizumab for Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.290.23.3073
The paper
Gordon, K. B., Papp, K. A., Hamilton, T. K., Walicke, P. A., Dummer, W., Li, N., Bresnahan, B. W., Menter, A., & for the Efalizumab Study Group. (2003). Efalizumab for Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.23.3073

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.