The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient-Physician Communication About Out-of-Pocket Costs
Abstract
CONTEXT: Out-of-pocket costs account for approximately one fifth of health care expenditures and are increasing. Previous research suggests that these costs are associated with medication nonadherence and considerable economic burden among some patients. Little is known about patient-physician communication regarding these costs. OBJECTIVE: To identify patients' and physicians' beliefs and practices regarding discussions of out-of-pocket costs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional paired surveys of 133 general internists and 484 of their outpatients, aged 18 years or older, in 3 academic and 18 community general medicine practices in the Chicago metropolitan area, March-November 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and physician beliefs regarding discussions of out-of-pocket costs, frequency and predictors of discussions, and physician recognition of patient burden from out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of patients reported a desire to talk with their physician about their out-of-pocket costs, and 79% of physicians believed that patients in general want to discuss these costs. By contrast, only 35% of physicians and 15% of patients reported ever having discussed the study patient's out-of-pocket costs. Multivariate analysis indicated that discussions were significantly more likely to occur with patients burdened by their out-of-pocket costs (prevalence ratio [PR], 2.55; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.62-3.76) and with those patients seen in a community practice (PR, 5.19; CI, 1.86-8.93). Among patients burdened by out-of-pocket costs, physicians were substantially more likely to recognize this burden when a prior discussion regarding out-of-pocket costs had taken place (80% vs 51%). CONCLUSIONS: Among respondents, both patients and physicians believed that discussions of out-of-pocket costs were important, yet these discussions occurred infrequently. Physician communication with patients about out-of-pocket costs may be an important yet neglected aspect of current clinical practice. Further research should identify the prevalence of this problem in broader populations, investigate its causes, and evaluate the impact of enhanced communication about out-of-pocket costs on patient satisfaction, utilization of care, and outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhang, J., & Yu, K. F. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.19.1690 · Cited by 4,138
Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.
(1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 4,085
Designing and conducting health surveys: a comprehensive guide
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5148 · Cited by 692
A Study of Patient Clues and Physician Responses in Primary Care and Surgical Settings
Levinson, W. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.8.1021 · Cited by 672
Effects of Medicaid Drug-Payment Limits on Admission to Hospitals and Nursing Homes
Soumerai, S. B., Ross-Degnan, D., Avorn, J., McLaughlin, T. J., & Choodnovskiy, I. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199110103251505 · Cited by 505
Payment Restrictions for Prescription Drugs under Medicaid
Soumerai, S. B., Avorn, J., Ross-Degnan, D., & Gortmaker, S. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198708273170906 · Cited by 409
The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care.
Starfield, B., Wray, C., Hess, K., Gross, R., Birk, P. S., & D'Lugoff, B. C. (1981) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.71.2.127 · Cited by 365
The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing
Leibowitz, A., Manning, W. G., & Newhouse, J. P. (1985) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(85)90161-3 · Cited by 286
Donelan, K., Blendon, R. J., Schoen, C., Davis, K., & Binns, K. (1999) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.206 · Cited by 250
Steinman, M. A., Sands, L. P., & Covinsky, K. E. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10412.x · Cited by 246
Cited by
Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application
Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036 · Cited by 1,745
Virani, S. S., Newby, L. K., Arnold, S. V., Bittner, V., Brewer, L. C., Demeter, S. H., Dixon, D. L., Fearon, W. F., Hess, B., Johnson, H. M., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001168 · Cited by 1,598
Schnipper, L. E., Davidson, N. E., Wollins, D. S., Tyne, C., Blayney, D. W., Blum, D., Dicker, A. P., Ganz, P. A., Hoverman, J. R., Langdon, R., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.61.6706 · Cited by 912
Peikes, D., Chen, A., Schore, J., & Brown, R. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.126 · Cited by 767
Virani, S. S., Newby, L. K., Arnold, S. V., Bittner, V., Brewer, L. C., Demeter, S. H., Dixon, D. L., Fearon, W. F., Hess, B., Johnson, H. M., et al. (2023) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.003 · Cited by 596
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, G. C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-08-20
- Volume
- 290
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 953
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2100860747
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 40.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient-Physician Communication About Out-of-Pocket Costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.290.7.953
- The paper
- Alexander, G. C. (2003). Patient-Physician Communication About Out-of-Pocket Costs. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.7.953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.