Cited by 113Innovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical EducationMedical Education and Admissions

Educational Programs in US Medical Schools, 2002-2003

Barzansky, Barbara·2003·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: To better provide medical students with the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values they will need as physicians, US medical schools continue to make ongoing changes to their staffing and curricula. OBJECTIVE: To review the status of US medical education in the 2002-2003 academic year, compared with 1997-1998. DATA SOURCES: The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) Annual Medical School Questionnaire, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Databook, and the AAMC Data Warehouse: Applicant Matriculant File. Data evaluated included those on medical school faculty, applicants, and students; curriculum hours devoted to new multidisciplinary or nontraditional subject areas (eg, cultural diversity, evidence-based medicine, medical ethics, medical informatics); and methods used to evaluate student learning. DATA SYNTHESIS: The number of full-time faculty members in the 126 LCME-accredited medical schools increased from 96 773 in 1997-1998 to 109 526 in 2002-2003 (+13.2%). The number of applicants entering decreased from 43 016 in 1997-1998 to 33 625 in 2002-2003 (-21.8%). The number of enrollees remained virtually unchanged from 1997-1998 (66 748) to 2002-2003 (66 677). Most medical schools have incorporated new subject areas into their curricula, although time devoted to these areas varies across schools. Schools typically use written examinations (National Board of Medical Examiners subject tests and/or internally prepared examinations) to assess factual knowledge, and observations by faculty members and residents to assess clinical skills. Use of standardized methods (eg, an objective structured clinical examination [OSCE]) to assess clinical skills is variable; 82 schools use a final third- or fourth-year comprehensive OSCE; 53 require a passing OSCE score for graduation. CONCLUSIONS: While the number of applicants to US medical schools has continued to decline, student numbers are constant. The number of full-time faculty members has increased. Schools are incorporating new subject areas into their curricula, and the use of standardized methods of assessing clinical skills, while variable, is generally increasing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.290.9.1190

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Professionalism is now a standard part of US medical school curricula; student professionalism is evaluated by observation and, in most medical schools, by formal testing in structured clinical examination settings.

    “Professionalism is now a standard part of US medical school curricula; 34 student professionalism is evaluated by observation and, in a majority of medical schools, by formal testing in structured clinical examination settings.35”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barzansky, B.
Affiliations
American Medical Association (US)
Corresponding author
Barzansky, Barbara
Venue
JAMA
Published
2003-09-03
Volume
290
Issue
9
Pages
1190
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1990839260
Cited by
113
References
12
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
medical education, medical curriculum, medical faculty, medical school applicants, medical school enrollment, clinical skills assessment, OSCE, student learning assessment, medical school accreditation
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Educational Measurement, Faculty, Medical, Female, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Male, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review