Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lipid-Lowering Therapy and In-Hospital Mortality Following Major Noncardiac Surgery

Lindenauer, Peter K.·2004·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cardiovascular complications following major noncardiac surgery are an important source of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Although lipid-lowering medications are considered a key component in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, their potential benefit during the perioperative period is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between treatment with lipid-lowering medications and in-hospital mortality following major noncardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A retrospective cohort study based on hospital discharge and pharmacy records of 780,591 patients aged 18 years or older who underwent major noncardiac surgery from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2001, at any 1 of 329 hospitals throughout the United States. Only patients who survived through at least the second hospital day were included. Lipid-lowering therapy was defined as use during the first 2 hospital days. Propensity matching was used to adjust for numerous baseline differences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 780,591 patients, 77,082 patients (9.9%) received lipid-lowering therapy perioperatively and 23 100 (2.96%) died during the hospitalization. Treatment with lipid-lowering agents was associated with lower crude mortality (2.13% vs 3.05%, P<.001). In an analysis using matching by propensity score, 1595 patients (2.18%) treated with lipid-lowering medications died compared with 4158 patients (3.15%) who did not receive therapy or in whom treatment was initiated after the second day (P<.001). After adjusting for residual differences in the propensity matched groups using conditional logistic regression, risk of mortality remained lower among treated patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.67). Based on this adjusted OR, the number needed to treat to prevent a postoperative death in the propensity matched cohort was 85 (95% CI, 77-98) and varied from 186 among patients at lowest risk to 30 among those with a revised cardiac risk index score of 4 or more. In a further analysis using the entire study cohort and adjusting for quintile of propensity, a significant effect of treatment persisted (adjusted OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with lipid-lowering agents may reduce risk of death following major noncardiac surgery. Clinical trials are required to confirm this observation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.291.17.2092

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Lindenauer, P. K.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2004-05-05
Volume
291
Issue
17
Pages
2092
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2036172774
Cited by
474
References
2
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lipid-Lowering Therapy and In-Hospital Mortality Following Major Noncardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.291.17.2092
The paper
Lindenauer, P. K. (2004). Lipid-Lowering Therapy and In-Hospital Mortality Following Major Noncardiac Surgery. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.17.2092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.