Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,588

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Validated Prediction Model for All Forms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Estimating the Risk of 6-Month Postdischarge Death in an International Registry

Eagle, Kim A., Lim, Michael J., Dabbous, Omar H., Pieper, Karen S., Goldberg, Robert J., Van de Werf, Frans, Goodman, Shaun G., Granger, Christopher B., Steg, P. Gabriel, Gore, Joel M., Budaj, Andrzej, Avezum, Álvaro, Flather, Marcus D., Fox, Keith A. A., for the GRACE Investigators·2004·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Accurate estimation of risk for untoward outcomes after patients have been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may help clinicians guide the type and intensity of therapy. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple decision tool for bedside risk estimation of 6-month mortality in patients surviving admission for an ACS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A multinational registry, involving 94 hospitals in 14 countries, that used data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) to develop and validate a multivariable stepwise regression model for death during 6 months postdischarge. From 17,142 patients presenting with an ACS from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2002, and discharged alive, 15,007 (87.5%) had complete 6-month follow-up and represented the development cohort for a model that was subsequently tested on a validation cohort of 7638 patients admitted from April 1, 2002, to December 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality during 6 months postdischarge after admission for an ACS. RESULTS: The 6-month mortality rates were similar in the development (n = 717; 4.8%) and validation cohorts (n = 331; 4.7%). The risk-prediction tool for all forms of ACS identified 9 variables predictive of 6-month mortality: older age, history of myocardial infarction, history of heart failure, increased pulse rate at presentation, lower systolic blood pressure at presentation, elevated initial serum creatinine level, elevated initial serum cardiac biomarker levels, ST-segment depression on presenting electrocardiogram, and not having a percutaneous coronary intervention performed in hospital. The c statistics for the development and validation cohorts were 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GRACE 6-month postdischarge prediction model is a simple, robust tool for predicting mortality in patients with ACS. Clinicians may find it simple to use and applicable to clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.291.22.2727

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,588

Metadata

Authors
Eagle, K. A., Lim, M. J., Dabbous, O. H., Pieper, K. S., Goldberg, R. J., Van de Werf, F., Goodman, S. G., Granger, C. B., Steg, P. G., Gore, J. M., Budaj, A., Avezum, Á., Flather, M. D., Fox, K. A. A., & for the GRACE Investigators
Venue
JAMA
Published
2004-06-09
Volume
291
Issue
22
Pages
2727
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2157184686
Cited by
1,588
References
0
FWCI
31.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Validated Prediction Model for All Forms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Estimating the Risk of 6-Month Postdischarge Death in an International Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.291.22.2727
The paper
Eagle, K. A., Lim, M. J., Dabbous, O. H., Pieper, K. S., Goldberg, R. J., Van de Werf, F., Goodman, S. G., Granger, C. B., Steg, P. G., Gore, J. M., Budaj, A., Avezum, Á., Flather, M. D., Fox, K. A. A., & for the GRACE Investigators. (2004). A Validated Prediction Model for All Forms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Estimating the Risk of 6-Month Postdischarge Death in an International Registry. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.22.2727

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.