Cited by 16Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Efficacy of an HIV Prevention Intervention for African American Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Controlled Trial

DiClemente, Ralph J., Wingood, Gina M., Harrington, Kathy F., Lang, Delia L., Davies, Susan L., Hook III, Edward W., Oh, M. Kim, Crosby, Richard A. +5 more·2004·JAMA

Abstract

Context African American adolescent girls are at high risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, but interventions specifically designed for this population have not reduced HIV risk behaviors. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of an intervention to reduce sexual risk behaviors, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and pregnancy and enhance mediators of HIV-preventive behaviors. Design, setting, and participants Randomized controlled trial of 522 sexually experienced African American girls aged 14 to 18 years screened from December 1996 through April 1999 at 4 community health agencies. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire and an interview, demonstrated condom application skills, and provided specimens for STD testing. Outcome assessments were made at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Intervention All participants received four 4-hour group sessions. The intervention emphasized ethnic and gender pride, HIV knowledge, communication, condom use skills, and healthy relationships. The comparison condition emphasized exercise and nutrition. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was consistent condom use, defined as condom use during every episode of vaginal intercourse; other outcome measures were sexual behaviors, observed condom application skills, incident STD infection, self-reported pregnancy, and mediators of HIV-preventive behaviors. Results Relative to the comparison condition, participants in the intervention reported using condoms m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.292.2.171

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an RCT with African American girls aged 14 to 18, an intervention that built gender empowerment, racial pride and solidarity with the black community enhanced HIV-prevention behaviors and skills such as increased condom use 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.

    “The study found that the intervention enhanced HIV-prevention behaviors and skills such as increased condom use 6 months and 12 months after the intervention [125,126].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Harrington, K. F., Lang, D. L., Davies, S. L., Hook III, E. W., Oh, M. K., Crosby, R. A., Hertzberg, V. S., Gordon, A. B., Hardin, J. W., Parker, S., & Robillard, A.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2004-07-14
Volume
292
Issue
2
Pages
171
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2129761319
Cited by
16
References
6
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1R01 MH 54412)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
HIV prevention interventions, African American adolescent girls, condom use, sexual risk behavior, sexually transmitted infections, contraception, HIV/AIDS knowledge, healthy relationships, HIV risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review