Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research: Implications of Respect for Participants
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study at Columbia University on 3068 pancreatic cancer patients found that only 48% patients had complete pathology records, while the rest had incomplete records about the disease.
“A Study was conducted at Columbia University on 3068 pancreatic cancer patients out of which only 48% patients had complete pathology records, while the rest had incomplete records about the disease [89].”
From Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record: Opportunities and Challenges (2020) · cites this paper as [89]
Cites
What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?
Emanuel, E. J. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.20.2701 · Cited by 2,710 · see citing works
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects
Cioms (1993) · Cited by 1,309 · see citing works
Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review
Broadstock, M., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. M. (2000) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200532 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Informing Study Participants of Research Results: An Ethical Imperative
Fernandez, C. V., Kodish, E. D., & Weijer, C. (2003) · IRB Ethics and Human Research · doi:10.2307/3564300 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Informing Clinical Trial Participants About Study Results
Partridge, A. H. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.363 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Protecting human research subjects : institutional review board guidebook
Watkins, J. E. (1993) · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Impact of DNA Testing for Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
Steinbart, E. J. (2001) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.58.11.1828 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study
Partridge, A. H., Wong, J. S., Knudsen, K. A., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71085-0 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Do Patients Participating in Clinical Trials Want to Know Study Results?
Partridge, A. H., Burstein, H., Gelman, R. S., et al. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.6.491 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Partridge, A. H., Hackett, N., Blood, E., Gelman, R. S., Joffe, S., Bauer‐Wu, S., Knudsen, K. A., Emmons, K. M., Collyar, D. E., Schilsky, R. L., et al. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh096 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Fernandez, C. V., Kodish, E. D., Shurin, S. B., & Weijer, C. (2003) · Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology · doi:10.1097/00043426-200309000-00006 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Impact on survivors of retinoblastoma when informed of study results on risk of second cancers
Schulz, C. J., Riddle, M. P., Valdimirsdottir, H. B., et al. (2003) · Medical and Pediatric Oncology · doi:10.1002/mpo.10278 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Fuller, B. P., Kahn, M. J. E., Barr, P. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5432.1359 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Cost of genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility mutations.
Lawrence, W., Peshkin, B. N., Liang, W., et al. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Impact of Presymptomatic Genetic Testing for Hereditary Ataxia and Neuromuscular Disorders
Smith, C. O., Lipe, H., & Bird, T. D. (2004) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.61.6.875 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Dijk, S. V., van Asperen, C. J., Jacobi, C. E., Vink, G. R., Tibben, A., Breuning, M. H., & Otten, W. (2004) · Genetic Testing · doi:10.1089/gte.2004.8.235 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Disclosure of the right of research participants to receive research results
Fernandez, C. V., Kodish, E. D., Taweel, S., et al. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11391 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Fanos, J. H., Gelinas, D. F., & Miller, R. G. (2004) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30178 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Banks, T. M. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov
Anderson, M. L., Chiswell, K., Peterson, E. D., Tasneem, A., Topping, J., & Califf, R. M. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1409364 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Informed Consent in Genomics and Genetic Research
McGuire, A. L., & Beskow, L. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141711 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record: Opportunities and Challenges
Shah, S. M., & Khan, R. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3011099 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development
Bridgelal Ram, M., Grocott, P. R., & Weir, H. C. M. (2008) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00464.x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shalowitz, D. I., & Miller, F. G.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-08-10
- Volume
- 294
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 737
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1994805877
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 17.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- individual patient data, disclosure of research results, data sharing, research ethics
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, United States, Disclosure, Patient Access to Records, Research Subjects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
