The DOI matches its Crossref record.
First Documented Rhythm and Clinical Outcome From In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Among Children and Adults
Abstract
CONTEXT: Cardiac arrests in adults are often due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), which are associated with better outcomes than asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Cardiac arrests in children are typically asystole or PEA. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that children have relatively fewer in-hospital cardiac arrests associated with VF or pulseless VT compared with adults and, therefore, worse survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective observational study from a multicenter registry (National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) of cardiac arrests in 253 US and Canadian hospitals between January 1, 2000, and March 30, 2004. A total of 36,902 adults (> or =18 years) and 880 children (<18 years) with pulseless cardiac arrests requiring chest compressions, defibrillation, or both were assessed. Cardiac arrests occurring in the delivery department, neonatal intensive care unit, and in the out-of-hospital setting were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: The rate of survival to hospital discharge following pulseless cardiac arrest was higher in children than adults (27% [236/880] vs 18% [6485/36,902]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-2.68). Of these survivors, 65% (154/236) of children and 73% (4737/6485) of adults had good neurological outcome. The prevalence of VF or pulseless VT as the first documented pulseless rhythm was 14% (120/880) in children and 23% (8361/36,902) in adults (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65; P<.001). The prevalence of asystole was 40% (350) in children and 35% (13 024) in adults (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.40; P = .006), whereas the prevalence of PEA was 24% (213) in children and 32% (11,963) in adults (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78; P<.001). After adjustment for differences in preexisting conditions, interventions in place at time of arrest, witnessed and/or monitored status, time to defibrillation of VF or pulseless VT, intensive care unit location of arrest, and duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, only first documented pulseless arrest rhythm remained significantly associated with differential survival to discharge (24% [135/563] in children vs 11% [2719/24,987] in adults with asystole and PEA; adjusted OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 2.23-3.32). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter registry of in-hospital cardiac arrest, the first documented pulseless arrest rhythm was typically asystole or PEA in both children and adults. Because of better survival after asystole and PEA, children had better outcomes than adults despite fewer cardiac arrests due to VF or pulseless VT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rosamond, W., Flegal, K., Friday, G., Furie, K., Go, A., Greenlund, K., Haase, N., Ho, M., Howard, V., Kissela, B., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.179918 · Cited by 3,277
Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest
Girotra, S., Nallamothu, B. K., Spertus, J. A., Li, Y., Krumholz, H. M., & Chan, P. S. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1109148 · Cited by 895
An algorithm based on deep learning for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest
Kwon, J., Lee, Y., Lee, Y., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2018) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.118.008678 · Cited by 299
Incidence and factors associated with cardiac arrest complicating emergency airway management
Heffner, A. C., Swords, D. S., Neale, M. N., & Jones, A. E. (2013) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.07.022 · Cited by 194
Association between a hospital's rate of cardiac arrest incidence and cardiac arrest survival
Chen, L. M. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1026 · Cited by 88
Kleinman, M. E., de Caen, A. R., Chameides, L., Atkins, D. L., Berg, R. A., Berg, M. D., Bhanji, F., Biarent, D., Bingham, R., Coovadia, A. H., et al. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2972a · Cited by 86
Self-citationAn Under-Recognized Benefit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Organ Transplantation*
Orioles, A., Morrison, W. E., Rossano, J. W., Shore, P. M., Hasz, R. D., Martiner, A. C., Berg, R. A., & Nadkarni, V. M. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31829a7202 · Cited by 59
Self-citationTonna, J. E., Selzman, C. H., Girotra, S., Presson, A. P., Thiagarajan, R. R., Becker, L. B., Zhang, C., Keenan, H. T., & the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines—Resuscitation Investigators (2020) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.119.015522 · Cited by 56
The culture of dysthanasia: attempting CPR in terminally ill children
Clark, J. D., & Dudzinski, D. M. (2013) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0393 · Cited by 51
Fehler, P., Zielińska, M., Uchmanowicz, B., Juárez-Vela, R., Lewandowski, Ł., Zieliński, S., & Czapla, M. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15020436 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Nadkarni, V. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2006-01-04
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2096758262
- Cited by
- 1,143
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 72.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.