Cited by 895Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesMechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest

Open access
Girotra, Saket, Nallamothu, Brahmajee K., Spertus, John A., Li, Yan, Krumholz, Harlan M., Chan, Paul S.·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in resuscitation care in recent years, it is not clear whether survival and neurologic function after in-hospital cardiac arrest have improved over time. METHODS: We identified all adults who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest at 374 hospitals in the Get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry between 2000 and 2009. Using multivariable regression, we examined temporal trends in risk-adjusted rates of survival to discharge. Additional analyses explored whether trends were due to improved survival during acute resuscitation or postresuscitation care and whether they occurred at the expense of greater neurologic disability in survivors. RESULTS: Among 84,625 hospitalized patients with cardiac arrest, 79.3% had an initial rhythm of asystole or pulseless electrical activity, and 20.7% had ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. The proportion of cardiac arrests due to asystole or pulseless electrical activity increased over time (P<0.001 for trend). Risk-adjusted rates of survival to discharge increased from 13.7% in 2000 to 22.3% in 2009 (adjusted rate ratio per year, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.06; P<0.001 for trend). Survival improvement was similar in the two rhythm groups and was due to improvement in both acute resuscitation survival and postresuscitation survival. Rates of clinically significant neurologic disability among survivors decreased over time, with a risk-adjusted rate of 32.9% in 2000 and 28.1% in 2009 (adjusted rate ratio per year, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00; P=0.02 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: Both survival and neurologic outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest have improved during the past decade at hospitals participating in a large national quality-improvement registry. (Funded by the American Heart Association.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1109148

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]Jennett B Bond M Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage Lancet 1975 1 480 4 46957
  2. [25]2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Circulation 2005 112 IV1 203 16314375

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Girotra, S., Nallamothu, B. K., Spertus, J. A., Li, Y., Krumholz, H. M., & Chan, P. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-11-15
Volume
367
Issue
20
Pages
1912-1920
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2143932987
Cited by
895
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 3
FWCI
68.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL102224)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Keywords
in-hospital cardiac arrest, survival to hospital discharge, neurodisability, temporal trends, post-resuscitation care, asystole, pulseless electrical activity, ventricular fibrillation, pulseless ventricular tachycardia, quality improvement
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Heart Arrest, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Patient Discharge, Registries, United States, Survival Analysis, Hospital Mortality, Risk Adjustment, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review