Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 427

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Risk of Developing Colorectal Cancer Following a Negative Colonoscopy Examination: Evidence for a 10-Year Interval Between Colonoscopies

Singh, Harminder, Turner, Donna, Xue, Lin, Targownik, Laura E., Bernstein, Charles N.·2006·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Limited evidence exists to guide the optimal frequency of repeat endoscopic examination for colorectal cancer screening after a negative colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the duration and magnitude of the risk of developing colorectal cancer following performance of a negative colonoscopy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Population-based retrospective analysis of individuals whose colonoscopy evaluations did not result in a diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Patients who had been evaluated between April 1, 1989, and December 31, 2003, were identified using Manitoba Health's physician billing claims database (N = 35 975). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare colorectal cancer incidence in our cohort with colorectal cancer incidence in the provincial population. Stratified analysis was performed to determine the duration of the reduced risk. Patients with a history of colorectal cancer prior to the index colonoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease, resective colorectal surgery, and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy within the 5 years before the index colonoscopy were excluded. Cohort members were followed up from the time of the index colonoscopy until diagnosis of colorectal cancer, death, out-migration from Manitoba, or end of the study period on December 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of colorectal cancer. RESULTS: A negative colonoscopy was associated with SIRs of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.81) at 6 months, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) at 1 year, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.48-0.72) at 2 years, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.73) at 5 years, and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.09-0.65) at 10 years. The proportion of colorectal cancer located in the right side of the colon was significantly higher in the colonoscopy cohort than the rate in the Manitoba population (47% vs 28%; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing colorectal cancer remains decreased for more than 10 years following the performance of a negative colonoscopy. There is a need to improve the early detection rate of right-sided colorectal neoplasia in usual clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.295.20.2366

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 427

Metadata

Authors
Singh, H., Turner, D., Xue, L., Targownik, L. E., & Bernstein, C. N.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2006-05-24
Volume
295
Issue
20
Pages
2366
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1974643789
Cited by
427
References
0
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Developing Colorectal Cancer Following a Negative Colonoscopy Examination: Evidence for a 10-Year Interval Between Colonoscopies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.295.20.2366
The paper
Singh, H., Turner, D., Xue, L., Targownik, L. E., & Bernstein, C. N. (2006). Risk of Developing Colorectal Cancer Following a Negative Colonoscopy Examination: Evidence for a 10-Year Interval Between Colonoscopies. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.20.2366

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.