Cited by 2,191Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

WM-DOVA maps for accurate polyp highlighting in colonoscopy: Validation vs. saliency maps from physicians

Open access
Bernal, Jorge, Sánchez, F. Javier, Fernández-Esparrach, Gloria, Gil, Debora, Rodríguez, Cristina, Vilariño, Fernando·2015·Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Abstract

We introduce in this paper a novel polyp localization method for colonoscopy videos. Our method is based on a model of appearance for polyps which defines polyp boundaries in terms of valley information. We propose the integration of valley information in a robust way fostering complete, concave and continuous boundaries typically associated to polyps. This integration is done by using a window of radial sectors which accumulate valley information to create WM-DOVA (Window Median Depth of Valleys Accumulation) energy maps related with the likelihood of polyp presence. We perform a double validation of our maps, which include the introduction of two new databases, including the first, up to our knowledge, fully annotated database with clinical metadata associated. First we assess that the highest value corresponds with the location of the polyp in the image. Second, we show that WM-DOVA energy maps can be comparable with saliency maps obtained from physicians' fixations obtained via an eye-tracker. Finally, we prove that our method outperforms state-of-the-art computational saliency results. Our method shows good performance, particularly for small polyps which are reported to be the main sources of polyp miss-rate, which indicates the potential applicability of our method in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.02.007

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The text prompt has not been released on the official GitHub repository.

    “Notably, the text prompt has not been released yet on the official GitHub repository 4 .”

    From Segment anything model for medical images? (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. C.M. Mann and H.J. Godwin et al., "Rapidly imparting the skills of experts to novice participants in threat assessment tasks", Book of Abstracts of ECEM 2013, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 245, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernal, J., Sánchez, F. J., Fernández-Esparrach, G., Gil, D., Rodríguez, C., & Vilariño, F.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Bernal, Jorge
Venue
Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
43
Pages
99-111
ISSN
  • 0730-4862 (ISSN-L)
  • 0895-6111
OpenAlex
W2008359794
Cited by
2,191
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 451 · 2025: 524 · 2024: 434 · 2023: 305 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Spanish Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
polyp localization, colonoscopy, saliency maps, eye tracking, polyp detection, small polyps, polyp miss rate, energy map
MeSH terms
Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sensitivity and Specificity, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review