Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism

Open access
Sechi, Leonardo A., Novello, Marileda, Lapenna, Roberta, Baroselli, Sara, Nadalini, Elisa, Colussi, Gian Luca, Catena, Cristiana·2006·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Experimental animal studies indicate that exposure to increased aldosterone levels might result in renal damage, but the clinical evidence supporting this role of aldosterone is preliminary. OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome of renal function in patients with primary aldosteronism after surgical or medical treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study conducted at an Italian university medical center among a consecutive sample of 50 patients who were diagnosed as having primary aldosteronism between January 1994 and December 2001 and who were followed up for a mean of 6.4 years after treatment with adrenalectomy or spironolactone. Patients with primary aldosteronism were compared with 100 patients with essential hypertension, matched for severity and duration of hypertension. All patients were treated with antihypertensive drugs to reach a target blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were rates of change of glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria during follow-up. Detection of new-onset microalbuminuria and restoration of normal albumin excretion during follow-up were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria were higher in patients with primary aldosteronism than those with essential hypertension. The mean blood pressure during the study was 136/81 mm Hg in the primary aldosteronism group and 137/81 mm Hg in the essential hypertension group. Glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria declined during the initial 6-month period in both groups, with a change that was significantly greater (P<.001 for both variables) in patients with primary aldosteronism. Subsequent rate of decline of glomerular filtration was comparable in the 2 groups, whereas albuminuria did not progress in the remainder of the follow-up. Restoration of normal albumin excretion from microalbuminuria was significantly more frequent in primary aldosteronism than in essential hypertension (P = .02). CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients in this study, primary aldosteronism was characterized by partially reversible renal dysfunction in which elevated albuminuria is a marker of a dynamic rather than structural renal defect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.295.22.2638

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Sechi, L. A., Novello, M., Lapenna, R., Baroselli, S., Nadalini, E., Colussi, G. L., & Catena, C.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2006-06-14
Volume
295
Issue
22
Pages
2638-45
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2061764902
Cited by
388
References
41
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.295.22.2638
The paper
Sechi, L. A., Novello, M., Lapenna, R., Baroselli, S., Nadalini, E., Colussi, G. L., & Catena, C. (2006). Long-term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.22.2638

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.