Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,130

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cancer Incidence Before and After Kidney Transplantation

Vajdic, Claire M., McDonald, Stephen P., McCredie, Margaret R. E., van Leeuwen, Marina T., Stewart, John H., Law, Matthew, Chapman, Jeremy R., Webster, Angela C., Kaldor, John M., Grulich, Andrew E.·2006·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Immune suppression after organ transplantation is associated with a markedly increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer and a few virus-associated cancers. Although it is generally accepted that other cancers do not occur at increased rates, there have been few long-term population-based cohort studies performed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of cancer in patients receiving immune suppression after kidney transplantation with incidence in the same population in 2 periods before receipt of immune suppression: during dialysis and during end-stage kidney disease before renal replacement therapy (RRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based cohort study of 28,855 patients with end-stage kidney disease who received RRT, with 273,407 person-years of follow-up. Incident cancers (1982-2003) were ascertained by record linkage between the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and the Australian National Cancer Statistics Clearing House. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of cancer, using age-specific, sex-specific, calendar year-specific, and state/territory-specific population cancer incidence rates. RESULTS: The overall incidence of cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer and those cancers known to frequently cause end-stage kidney disease, was markedly increased after transplantation (n = 1236; SIR, 3.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.09-3.46). In contrast, cancer incidence was only slightly increased during dialysis (n = 870; SIR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27-1.45) and before RRT (n = 689; SIR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.25). After transplantation, cancer occurred at significantly increased incidence at 25 sites, and risk exceeded 3-fold at 18 of these sites. Most of these cancers were of known or suspected viral etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation is associated with a marked increase in cancer risk at a wide variety of sites. Because SIRs for most types of cancer were not increased before transplantation, immune suppression may be responsible for the increased risk. These data suggest a broader than previously appreciated role of the interaction between the immune system and common viral infections in the etiology of cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.296.23.2823

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,130

Metadata

Authors
Vajdic, C. M., McDonald, S. P., McCredie, M. R. E., van Leeuwen, M. T., Stewart, J. H., Law, M., Chapman, J. R., Webster, A. C., Kaldor, J. M., & Grulich, A. E.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2006-12-20
Volume
296
Issue
23
Pages
2823
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2146163878
Cited by
1,130
References
0
FWCI
33.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Incidence Before and After Kidney Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.296.23.2823
The paper
Vajdic, C. M., McDonald, S. P., McCredie, M. R. E., van Leeuwen, M. T., Stewart, J. H., Law, M., Chapman, J. R., Webster, A. C., Kaldor, J. M., & Grulich, A. E. (2006). Cancer Incidence Before and After Kidney Transplantation. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.23.2823

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.