CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 409Workplace Health and Well-beingMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Telephone Screening, Outreach, and Care Management for Depressed Workers and Impact on Clinical and Work Productivity Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Wang, Philip S., Simon, Gregory E., Avorn, Jerry, Azocar, Francisca, Ludman, Evette J., McCulloch, Joyce, Petukhova, Maria Z., Kessler, Ronald C.·2007·JAMA
DOI 10.1001/jama.298.12.1401PMC PMC2859667
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although guideline-concordant depression treatment is clearly effective, treatment often falls short of evidence-based recommendations. Organized depression care programs significantly improve treatment quality, but employer purchasers have been slow to adopt these programs based on lack of evidence for cost-effectiveness from their perspective. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a depression outreach-treatment program on workplace outcomes, a concern to employers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized controlled trial involving 604 employees covered by a managed behavioral health plan were identified in a 2-stage screening process as having significant depression. Patient treatment allocation was concealed and assessment of depression severity and work performance at months 6 and 12 was blinded. Employees with lifetime bipolar disorder, substance disorder, recent mental health specialty care, or suicidality were excluded. INTERVENTION: A telephonic outreach and care management program encouraged workers to enter outpatient treatment (psychotherapy and/or antidepressant medication), monitored treatment quality continuity, and attempted to improve treatment by giving recommendations to providers. Participants reluctant to enter treatment were offered a structured telephone cognitive behavioral psychotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depression severity (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, QIDS) and work performance (World Health Organization Health and Productivity Questionnaire [HPQ], a validated self-report instrument assessing job retention, time missed from work, work performance, and critical workplace incidents). RESULTS: Combining data across 6- and 12-month assessments, the intervention group had significantly lower QIDS self-report scores (relative odds of recovery, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.0; P = .009), significantly higher job retention (relative odds, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.3; P = .02), and significantly more hours worked among the intervention (beta=2.0; P=.02; equivalent to an annualized effect of 2 weeks of work) than the usual care groups that were employed. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic program to identify depression and promote effective treatment significantly improves not only clinical outcomes but also workplace outcomes. The financial value of the latter to employers in terms of recovered hiring, training, and salary costs suggests that many employers would experience a positive return on investment from outreach and enhanced treatment of depressed workers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00057590.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.298.12.1401

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [4]Greenberg PE, Kessler RC, Nells TL, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER. Depression in the workplace: an economic perspective. In: Feighner JP, Boyer WF, editors. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors: advances in basic research and clinical practice. 2 ed. John Wiley & Sons; New York, NY: 1996. pp. 327–363. [Google Scholar]
  2. [8]Kessler RC, Mickelson KD, Barber CB, Wang PS. The association between chronic medical conditions and work impairment. In: Rossi AS, editor. Caring and Doing for Others: Social Responsibility in the Domains of Family, Work, and Community. University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL: 2001. pp. 403–426. [Google Scholar]
  3. [58]Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Tutty S. Creating a Balance: A Step-by-Step Approach to Managing Stress and Lifting Your Mood. Trafford Press; Victoria, BC: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. [61]Beck A, Rush A, Shaw B, Emery G. Cognitive Therapy of Depression. Guilford Press; New York, NY: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  5. [83]Ryder R. Implementation strategies and applications for health risk appraisals. In: Hyner GC, Peterson KW, Travis JW, Dewey JE, Foerster JJ, Framer EM, editors. SPM Handbook of Health Assessment Tools. Society for Prospective Medicine and the Institute for Health and Productivity Management; Pittsburgh, PA: 1999. pp. 179–184. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 409

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wang, P. S., Simon, G. E., Avorn, J., Azocar, F., Ludman, E. J., McCulloch, J., Petukhova, M. Z., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health (US)
ORCID
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2007-09-26
Volume
298
Issue
12
Pages
1401
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
DOI
10.1001/jama.298.12.1401
PMC
PMC2859667
OpenAlex
W2047011180
Cited by
408
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 36
FWCI
69.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061941, R01 MH61941)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
telephone outreach, care management, labor productivity, job retention, employee performance, cognitive behavioral therapy, medication adherence, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Antidepressive Agents, Community-Institutional Relations, Depression, Efficiency, Female, Humans, Male, Managed Care Programs, Mass Screening, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Telephone, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review