Cited by 68Workplace Health and Well-beingMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Impact of a Work-Focused Intervention on the Productivity and Symptoms of Employees With Depression

Open access
Lerner, Debra, Adler, David, Hermann, Richard C., Chang, Hong, Ludman, Evette J., Greenhill, Annabel, Perch, Katherine, McPeck, William C. +1 more·2012·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test a new program's effectiveness in reducing depression's work burden. METHODS: A brief telephonic program to improve work functioning was tested in an early-stage randomized controlled trial involving 79 Maine State Government employees who were screened in for depression and at-work limitations (treatment group = 59; usual care group = 27). Group differences in baseline to follow-up change scores on the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), WLQ Absence Module, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 depression severity scale were tested with analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Although there were no baseline group differences (P ≥ 0.05), by follow-up, the treatment group had significantly better scores on every outcome and differences in the longitudinal changes were all statistically significant (P = 0.0.27 to 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new program was superior to usual care. The estimated productivity cost savings is $6041.70 per participant annually.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e31824409d8

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lerner, D., Adler, D., Hermann, R. C., Chang, H., Ludman, E. J., Greenhill, A., Perch, K., McPeck, W. C., & Rogers, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Lerner, Debra
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2012-02
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
128-135
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991635039
Cited by
68
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH072735)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
depression, labor productivity, work limitations, employee health programs, absenteeism, depression severity, state employees, Work Limitations Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Maine, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Efficiency, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review