Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 775

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation and Treatment of Chagas Disease in the United States: A Systematic Review

Bern, Caryn, Montgomery, Susan P., Herwaldt, Barbara L., Rassi, Anis, Marin-Neto, Jose Antonio, Dantas, Roberto O., Maguire, James H., Acquatella, Harry, Morillo, Carlos, Kirchhoff, Louis V., Gilman, Robert H., Reyes, Pedro A., Salvatella, Roberto, Moore, Anne C.·2007·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Because of population migration from endemic areas and newly instituted blood bank screening, US clinicians are likely to see an increasing number of patients with suspected or confirmed chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection (Chagas disease). OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base and provide practical recommendations for evaluation, counseling, and etiologic treatment of patients with chronic T cruzi infection. Evidence Acquisition Literature review conducted based on a systematic MEDLINE search for all available years through 2007; review of additional articles, reports, and book chapters; and input from experts in the field. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The patient newly diagnosed with Chagas disease should undergo a medical history, physical examination, and resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with a 30-second lead II rhythm strip. If this evaluation is normal, no further testing is indicated; history, physical examination, and ECG should be repeated annually. If findings suggest Chagas heart disease, a comprehensive cardiac evaluation, including 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring, echocardiography, and exercise testing, is recommended. If gastrointestinal tract symptoms are present, barium contrast studies should be performed. Antitrypanosomal treatment is recommended for all cases of acute and congenital Chagas disease, reactivated infection, and chronic T cruzi infection in individuals 18 years or younger. In adults aged 19 to 50 years without advanced heart disease, etiologic treatment may slow development and progression of cardiomyopathy and should generally be offered; treatment is considered optional for those older than 50 years. Individualized treatment decisions for adults should balance the potential benefit, prolonged course, and frequent adverse effects of the drugs. Strong consideration should be given to treatment of previously untreated patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection or those expecting to undergo organ transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Chagas disease presents an increasing challenge for clinicians in the United States. Despite gaps in the evidence base, current knowledge is sufficient to make practical recommendations to guide appropriate evaluation, management, and etiologic treatment of Chagas disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.298.18.2171

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 775

Metadata

Authors
Bern, C., Montgomery, S. P., Herwaldt, B. L., Rassi, A., Marin-Neto, J. A., Dantas, R. O., Maguire, J. H., Acquatella, H., Morillo, C., Kirchhoff, L. V., Gilman, R. H., Reyes, P. A., Salvatella, R., & Moore, A. C.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2007-11-14
Volume
298
Issue
18
Pages
2171
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2013276329
Cited by
775
References
0
FWCI
30.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation and Treatment of Chagas Disease in the United States: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.298.18.2171
The paper
Bern, C., Montgomery, S. P., Herwaldt, B. L., Rassi, A., Marin-Neto, J. A., Dantas, R. O., Maguire, J. H., Acquatella, H., Morillo, C., Kirchhoff, L. V., Gilman, R. H., Reyes, P. A., Salvatella, R., & Moore, A. C. (2007). Evaluation and Treatment of Chagas Disease in the United States: A Systematic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.18.2171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.