The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation and Treatment of Chagas Disease in the United States: A Systematic Review
Abstract
CONTEXT: Because of population migration from endemic areas and newly instituted blood bank screening, US clinicians are likely to see an increasing number of patients with suspected or confirmed chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection (Chagas disease). OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base and provide practical recommendations for evaluation, counseling, and etiologic treatment of patients with chronic T cruzi infection. Evidence Acquisition Literature review conducted based on a systematic MEDLINE search for all available years through 2007; review of additional articles, reports, and book chapters; and input from experts in the field. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The patient newly diagnosed with Chagas disease should undergo a medical history, physical examination, and resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with a 30-second lead II rhythm strip. If this evaluation is normal, no further testing is indicated; history, physical examination, and ECG should be repeated annually. If findings suggest Chagas heart disease, a comprehensive cardiac evaluation, including 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring, echocardiography, and exercise testing, is recommended. If gastrointestinal tract symptoms are present, barium contrast studies should be performed. Antitrypanosomal treatment is recommended for all cases of acute and congenital Chagas disease, reactivated infection, and chronic T cruzi infection in individuals 18 years or younger. In adults aged 19 to 50 years without advanced heart disease, etiologic treatment may slow development and progression of cardiomyopathy and should generally be offered; treatment is considered optional for those older than 50 years. Individualized treatment decisions for adults should balance the potential benefit, prolonged course, and frequent adverse effects of the drugs. Strong consideration should be given to treatment of previously untreated patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection or those expecting to undergo organ transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Chagas disease presents an increasing challenge for clinicians in the United States. Despite gaps in the evidence base, current knowledge is sufficient to make practical recommendations to guide appropriate evaluation, management, and etiologic treatment of Chagas disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rassi, A., Rassi, A., & Marin-Neto, J. A. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60061-x · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationBaron, E. J., Miller, J. M., Weinstein, M. P., Richter, S. S., Gilligan, P. H., Thomson, R. B., Bourbeau, P., Carroll, K. C., Kehl, S. C., Dunne, W. M., et al. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit278 · Cited by 592
American Trypanosomiasis (Chagas Disease)
Rassi, A., Rassi, A., & Marcondes de Rezende, J. (2012) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2012.03.002 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bern, C., Montgomery, S. P., Herwaldt, B. L., Rassi, A., Marin-Neto, J. A., Dantas, R. O., Maguire, J. H., Acquatella, H., Morillo, C., Kirchhoff, L. V., Gilman, R. H., Reyes, P. A., Salvatella, R., & Moore, A. C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-11-14
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2171
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2013276329
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation and Treatment of Chagas Disease in the United States: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.298.18.2171
- The paper
- Bern, C., Montgomery, S. P., Herwaldt, B. L., Rassi, A., Marin-Neto, J. A., Dantas, R. O., Maguire, J. H., Acquatella, H., Morillo, C., Kirchhoff, L. V., Gilman, R. H., Reyes, P. A., Salvatella, R., & Moore, A. C. (2007). Evaluation and Treatment of Chagas Disease in the United States: A Systematic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.18.2171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.