The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of Teaching Quality Improvement to Clinicians: A Systematic Review
Abstract
CONTEXT: Accreditation requirements mandate teaching quality improvement (QI) concepts to medical trainees, yet little is known about the effectiveness of teaching QI. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the effectiveness of published QI curricula for clinicians and to determine whether teaching methods influence the effectiveness of such curricula. DATA SOURCES: The electronic literature databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for English-language articles published between January 1, 1980, and April 30, 2007. Experts in the field of QI were queried about relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion if the curriculum taught QI principles to clinicians and the evaluation used a comparative study design. DATA EXTRACTION: Information about the features of each curriculum, its use of 9 principles of adult learning, and the type of educational and clinical outcomes were extracted. The relationship between the outcomes and the number of educational principles used was assessed. RESULTS: Of 39 studies that met eligibility criteria, 31 described team-based projects; 37 combined didactic instruction with experiential learning. The median number of adult learning principles used was 7 (range, 2-8). Evaluations included 22 controlled trials (8 randomized and 14 nonrandomized) and 17 pre/post or time series studies. Fourteen studies described educational outcomes (attitudes, knowledge, or skills or behaviors) and 28 studies described clinical process or patient outcomes. Nine of the 10 studies that evaluated knowledge reported only positive effects but only 2 of these described a validated assessment tool. The 6 assessments of attitudes found mixed results. Four of the 6 studies on skill or behavior outcomes reported only positive effects. Eight of the 28 studies of clinical outcomes reported only beneficial effects. Controlled studies were more likely than other studies to report mixed or null effects. Only 4 studies evaluated both educational and clinical outcomes, providing limited evidence that educational outcomes influence the clinical effectiveness of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Most published QI curricula apply sound adult learning principles and demonstrate improvement in learners' knowledge or confidence to perform QI. Additional studies are needed to determine whether educational methods have meaningful clinical benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gilbody, S., Whitty, P., Grimshaw, J., & Thomas, R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3145 · Cited by 749
Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses?
Berlin, J. A. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62352-5 · Cited by 478
Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives
Mittman, B. S. (2004) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00011 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Forsetlund, L., Bjørndal, A., Rashidian, A., Jamtvedt, G., O'Brien, M. A., Wolf, F. M., Davis, D., Odgaard-Jensen, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub2 · Cited by 1,849
P. Khare, S., & Kanyal, D. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jun386 · Cited by 959
Teaching Quality Improvement and Patient Safety to Trainees: A Systematic Review
Wong, B. M., Etchells, E. E., Kuper, A., Levinson, W., & Shojania, K. G. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181e2d0c6 · Cited by 476
Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods
McKenzie, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2019) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9781119536604.ch12 · Cited by 423
Forsetlund, L., O'Brien, M. A., Forsén, L., Mwai, L., Reinar, L. M., Okwen, M. P., Horsley, T., & Rose, C. J. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub3 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Boonyasai, R. T., Windish, D. M., Chakraborti, C., Feldman, L. S., Rubin, H. R., & Bass, E. B.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-09-05
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1023
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1967280435
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of Teaching Quality Improvement to Clinicians: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.298.9.1023
- The paper
- Boonyasai, R. T., Windish, D. M., Chakraborti, C., Feldman, L. S., Rubin, H. R., & Bass, E. B. (2007). Effectiveness of Teaching Quality Improvement to Clinicians: A Systematic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.9.1023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.