The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization and Risk of Nosocomial Events in Adults Requiring Acute Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Based on concerns about the risk of infection, the jugular site is often preferred over the femoral site for short-term dialysis vascular access. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether jugular catheterization decreases the risk of nosocomial complications compared with femoral catheterization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A concealed, randomized, multicenter, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group trial (the Cathedia Study) of 750 patients from a network of 9 tertiary care university medical centers and 3 general hospitals in France conducted between May 2004 and May 2007. The severely ill, bed-bound adults had a body mass index (BMI) of less than 45 and required a first catheter insertion for renal replacement therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive jugular or femoral vein catheterization by operators experienced in placement at both sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of infectious complications, defined as catheter colonization on removal (primary end point), and catheter-related bloodstream infection. RESULTS: Patient and catheter characteristics, including duration of catheterization, were similar in both groups. More hematomas occurred in the jugular group than in the femoral group (13/366 patients [3.6%] vs 4/370 patients [1.1%], respectively; P = .03). The risk of catheter colonization at removal did not differ significantly between the femoral and jugular groups (incidence of 40.8 vs 35.7 per 1000 catheter-days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.16; P = .31). A prespecified subgroup analysis demonstrated significant qualitative heterogeneity by BMI (P for the interaction term < .001). Jugular catheterization significantly increased incidence of catheter colonization vs femoral catheterization (45.4 vs 23.7 per 1000 catheter-days; HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.13-3.91; P = .017) in the lowest tercile (BMI <24.2), whereas jugular catheterization significantly decreased this incidence (24.5 vs 50.9 per 1000 catheter-days; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.69; P < .001) in the highest tercile (BMI >28.4). The rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection was similar in both groups (2.3 vs 1.5 per 1000 catheter-days, respectively; P = .42). CONCLUSION: Jugular venous catheterization access does not appear to reduce the risk of infection compared with femoral access, except among adults with a high BMI, and may have a higher risk of hematoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00277888.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections
O'Grady, N. P., Alexander, M., Burns, L. A., Dellinger, E. P., Garland, J., Heard, S. O., Lipsett, P. A., Masur, H., Mermel, L. A., Pearson, M. L., et al. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir257 · Cited by 4,699
An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU
Pronovost, P., Needham, D., Berenholtz, S., Sinopoli, D., Chu, H., Cosgrove, S., Sexton, B., Hyzy, R., Welsh, R., Roth, G., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061115 · Cited by 4,387
Uchino, S. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.7.813 · Cited by 4,176
Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization
McGee, D. C., & Gould, M. K. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra011883 · Cited by 2,290
A Semiquantitative Culture Method for Identifying Intravenous-Catheter-Related Infection
Maki, D. G., Weise, C. E., & Sarafin, H. W. (1977) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197706092962301 · Cited by 2,027
Merrer, J. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.6.700 · Cited by 1,187
Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections
(2021) · Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education · doi:10.4103/2230-7354.320831 · Cited by 855
Maki, D. G., Alvarado, C. J., & Ringer, M. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90479-9 · Cited by 845
Karakitsos, D., Labropoulos, N., De Groot, E., Patrianakos, A. P., Kouraklis, G., Poularas, J., Samonis, G., Tsoutsos, D. A., Konstadoulakis, M. M., & Karabinis, A. (2006) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc5101 · Cited by 639
Brookes, S. T., Whitley, E., Peters, T. J., Mulheran, P. A., Egger, M., & Davey Smith, G. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5330 · Cited by 580
Cited by
Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections
O'Grady, N. P., Alexander, M., Burns, L. A., Dellinger, E. P., Garland, J., Heard, S. O., Lipsett, P. A., Masur, H., Mermel, L. A., Pearson, M. L., et al. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir257 · Cited by 4,699
KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update
Lok, C. E., Huber, T. S., Lee, T., Shenoy, S., Yevzlin, A. S., Abreo, K., Allon, M., Asif, A., Astor, B. C., Glickman, M. H., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001 · Cited by 2,590
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections
O'Grady, N. P., Alexander, M., Burns, L. A., Dellinger, E. P., Garland, J., Heard, S. O., Lipsett, P. A., Masur, H., Mermel, L. A., Pearson, M. L., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003 · Cited by 1,066
KDOQI US Commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury
Palevsky, P. M., Liu, K. D., Brophy, P. D., Chawla, L. S., Parikh, C. R., Thakar, C. V., Tolwani, A. J., Waikar, S. S., & Weisbord, S. D. (2013) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.349 · Cited by 935
ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults
Pironi, L., Arends, J., Bozzetti, F., Cuerda, C., Gillanders, L., Jeppesen, P. B., Joly, F., Kelly, D., Lal, S., Staun, M., et al. (2016) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.020 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Parienti, J.-J., Thirion, M., Mégarbane, B., Souweine, B., Ouchikhe, A., Polito, A., Forel, J.-M., Marqué, S., Misset, B., Airapetian, N., Daurel, C., Mira, J.-P., Ramakers, M., du Cheyron, D., Le Coutour, X., Daubin, C., Charbonneau, P., & for Members of the Cathedia Study Group
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-05-28
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2413
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2015465351
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 46.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization and Risk of Nosocomial Events in Adults Requiring Acute Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.299.20.2413
- The paper
- Parienti, J.-J., Thirion, M., Mégarbane, B., Souweine, B., Ouchikhe, A., Polito, A., Forel, J.-M., Marqué, S., Misset, B., Airapetian, N., Daurel, C., Mira, J.-P., Ramakers, M., du Cheyron, D., Le Coutour, X., Daubin, C., Charbonneau, P., & for Members of the Cathedia Study Group. (2008). Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization and Risk of Nosocomial Events in Adults Requiring Acute Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.20.2413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.