The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electromagnetic Interference From Radio Frequency Identification Inducing Potentially Hazardous Incidents in Critical Care Medical Equipment
Abstract
CONTEXT: Health care applications of autoidentification technologies, such as radio frequency identification (RFID), have been proposed to improve patient safety and also the tracking and tracing of medical equipment. However, electromagnetic interference (EMI) by RFID on medical devices has never been reported. OBJECTIVE: To assess and classify incidents of EMI by RFID on critical care equipment. DESIGN AND SETTING: Without a patient being connected, EMI by 2 RFID systems (active 125 kHz and passive 868 MHz) was assessed under controlled conditions during May 2006, in the proximity of 41 medical devices (in 17 categories, 22 different manufacturers) at the Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Assessment took place according to an international test protocol. Incidents of EMI were classified according to a critical care adverse events scale as hazardous, significant, or light. RESULTS: In 123 EMI tests (3 per medical device), RFID induced 34 EMI incidents: 22 were classified as hazardous, 2 as significant, and 10 as light. The passive 868-MHz RFID signal induced a higher number of incidents (26 incidents in 41 EMI tests; 63%) compared with the active 125-kHz RFID signal (8 incidents in 41 EMI tests; 20%); difference 44% (95% confidence interval, 27%-53%; P < .001). The passive 868-MHz RFID signal induced EMI in 26 medical devices, including 8 that were also affected by the active 125-kHz RFID signal (26 in 41 devices; 63%). The median distance between the RFID reader and the medical device in all EMI incidents was 30 cm (range, 0.1-600 cm). CONCLUSIONS: In a controlled nonclinical setting, RFID induced potentially hazardous incidents in medical devices. Implementation of RFID in the critical care environment should require on-site EMI tests and updates of international standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimizing Emergency Department Front-End Operations
Wiler, J. L., Gentle, C., Halfpenny, J. M., Heins, A., Mehrotra, A., Mikhail, M. G., & Fite, D. (2010) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.021 · Cited by 339
Crossley, G. H., Poole, J. E., Rozner, M. A., Asirvatham, S. J., Cheng, A., Chung, M. K., Ferguson, T. B., Gallagher, J. D., Gold, M. R., Hoyt, R. H., et al. (2011) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.05.010 · Cited by 300
The Adoption and Implementation of RFID Technologies in Healthcare: A Literature Review
Yao, W., Chu, C.-H., & Li, Z. (2012) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-011-9789-8 · Cited by 289
Mattei, E., Lucano, E., Censi, F., Triventi, M., & Calcagnini, G. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · doi:10.1109/temc.2015.2504602 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Togt, R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-06-25
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2884
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2106096244
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 449.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electromagnetic Interference From Radio Frequency Identification Inducing Potentially Hazardous Incidents in Critical Care Medical Equipment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.299.24.2884
- The paper
- van der Togt, R. (2008). Electromagnetic Interference From Radio Frequency Identification Inducing Potentially Hazardous Incidents in Critical Care Medical Equipment. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.24.2884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.