Cited by 22RFID technology advancementsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Provocative Testing for the Assessment of the Electromagnetic Interference of RFID and NFC Readers on Implantable Pacemaker

Mattei, Eugenio, Lucano, Elena, Censi, Federica, Triventi, Michele, Calcagnini, Giovanni·2016·IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to perform provocative testing for the assessment of the electromagnetic interference (EMI) of radiofrequency identification (RFID) and near field communication (NFC) readers on implantable pacemakers (PMs). Ten PMs were exposed to the electromagnetic field generated by an RFID/NFC reader emulator, in the LF (125 kHz), HF and NCF (13.56 MHz), and UHF (900 MHz) bands. Provocative tests were performed by increasing the field strength beyond the maximum levels allowed for commercial devices. PMs were affected by EMI for all three frequency bands. For the LF RFID, 2/10 PMs when exposed to magnetic field levels typical of commercial devices (100 A/m) and 9/10 PMs at a magnetic field of 500 A/m. For the HF RFID and NFC, 3/10 PMs when exposed to output power levels of magnetic field typical of commercial devices (4 W), and 7/10 PMs at 10 W. For the UHF RFID, 2/10 at output power lever of 2 W, and increasing the output power level up to 20 W did not caused EMI in the other PMs. For the PMs evaluated, the provocative tests performed in this study revealed that the safety margin is narrow in the LF and HF/NFC bands, whereas a fair margin exists in the UHF band.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/temc.2015.2504602

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Power transfer methods such as NFC or RF can conflict with frequencies used for data transfer, resulting in signal corruption that can affect diagnosis and monitoring of neurological conditions.

    “These methods, while effective for power delivery, can conflict with the frequencies used for data transfer resulting in signal corruption, which can affect the diagnosis and monitoring of neurological conditions (Dobkin, 2012; Mattei et al., 2016).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Mattei et al., 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mattei, E., Lucano, E., Censi, F., Triventi, M., & Calcagnini, G.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility
Published
2016-02
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
314-322
ISSN
  • 0018-9375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-187X
OpenAlex
W2290054612
Cited by
22
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › RFID technology advancements
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Keywords
electromagnetic interference, implantable pacemaker, RFID reader, near field communication, provocation tests, magnetic field exposure, HF RFID, UHF RFID, safety margin, pacemaker safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review