Association of Prior Authorization and Out-of-pocket Costs With Patient Access to PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Although PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) were approved in 2015, their high cost has led to strict prior authorization practices and high copays, and use of PSCK9i in clinical practice has been low. Objective: To evaluate patient access to PCSK9i among those prescribed therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using pharmacy transaction data, we evaluated 45 029 patients who were newly prescribed PCSK9i in the United States between August 1, 2015, and July 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of PCSK9i prescriptions approved and abandoned (approved but unfilled); multivariable analyses examined factors associated with approval/abandonment including payor, prescriber specialty, pharmacy benefit manager, out-of-pocket cost (copay), clinical diagnoses, lipid-lowering medication use, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Results: Of patients given an incident PCSK9i prescription, 51.2% were women, 56.6% were 65 years or older, and 52.5% had governmental insurance. Of the patients given a prescription, 20.8% received approval on the first day, and 47.2% ever received approval. Of those approved, 65.3% filled the prescription, resulting in 30.9% of those prescribed PCSK9i ever receiving therapy. After adjustment, patients who were older, male, and had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were more likely to be approved, but approval rates did not vary by patient low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level nor statin use. Other factors associated with drug approval included having government vs commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR], 3.3; 95% CI, 2.8-3.8), and those filled at a specialty vs retail pharmacy (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.66-2.33). Approval rates varied nearly 3-fold among the top 10 largest pharmacy benefit managers. Prescription abandonment by patients was most associated with copay costs (C statistic, 0.86); with abandonment rates ranging from 7.5% for those with $0 copay to more than 75% for copays greater than $350. Conclusions and Relevance: In the first year of availability, only half of patients prescribed a PCSK9i received approval, and one-third of approved prescriptions were never filled owing to copay.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PCSK9 inhibitors are effective but frequent injections and high price restrict their acceptance by healthcare providers.
“PCSK9 inhibitors have proven their effectiveness but their frequent injections and expensive price have restricted their acceptance by healthcare providers [78, 79].”
From Inclisiran SiRNA therapy for durable LDL-C reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting a breakthrough in long-term cardiovascular risk management (2026) · cites this paper as [79]
The Discussion reports that trial data demonstrated PCSK9 inhibitor effectiveness, and the Conclusions link high cost to prior authorization, high copays, and reduced patient access. The paper does not say that frequent injections or price restricted acceptance by healthcare providers; it examines whether patients received prescriptions their providers had already written. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredReal-world use of injectable PCSK9 therapies has been constrained by persistent payor rejection, prior authorization requirements, administrative burden, and patient out-of-pocket costs.
“Real-world use has been constrained by persistent payor rejection, prior authorization requirements, administrative burden, and patient out-of-pocket costs.”
From Oral PCSK9 inhibitors for elevated LDL-C: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease
Sabatine, M. S., Giugliano, R. P., Keech, A. C., Honarpour, N., Wiviott, S. D., Murphy, S. A., Kuder, J. F., Wang, H., Liu, T., Wasserman, S. M., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1615664 · Cited by 6,138 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [3]Kazi DS Moran AE Coxson PG Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease JAMA 2016 316 7 743 753 27533159
- [4]Gandra SR Villa G Fonarow GC Cost-effectiveness of LDL-C lowering with evolocumab in patients with high cardiovascular risk in the United States Clin Cardiol 2016 39 6 313 320 27092712 PMC5074319
- [5]Mastey V Johnstone BM Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy JAMA 2016 316 20 2151 2152 27893122
- [8]Baum SJ Howard WB Karayan L Access to Nonstatin Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Patients at High Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Circulation 2017 135 22 2204 2206 28446516
- [10]Casalino LP Nicholson S Gans DN What does it cost physician practices to interact with health insurance plans? Health Affairs 2009 28 4 w533 543 19443477
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
Arnett, D. K., Blumenthal, R. S., Albert, M. A., Buroker, A. B., Goldberger, Z. D., Hahn, E. J., Himmelfarb, C. D., Khera, A., Lloyd-Jones, D., McEvoy, J. W., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010 · Cited by 1,896 · see citing works
Virani, S. S., Newby, L. K., Arnold, S. V., Bittner, V., Brewer, L. C., Demeter, S. H., Dixon, D. L., Fearon, W. F., Hess, B., Johnson, H. M., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001168 · Cited by 1,598 · see citing works
Virani, S. S., Newby, L. K., Arnold, S. V., Bittner, V., Brewer, L. C., Demeter, S. H., Dixon, D. L., Fearon, W. F., Hess, B., Johnson, H. M., et al. (2023) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.003 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Cheen, M. H. H., Tan, Y. Z., Oh, L. F., Wee, H. L., & Thumboo, J. (2019) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/ijcp.13350 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Luo, J., Feldman, R., Callaway Kim, K., Rothenberger, S., Korytkowski, M., Hernandez, I., & Gellad, W. F. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17886 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Inclisiran: a novel agent for lowering apolipoprotein B–containing lipoproteins
Warden, B. A., & Duell, P. B. (2021) · Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/fjc.0000000000001053 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Ross, E. L., & Soeteman, D. I. (2020) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201900625 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Satyam, S. M., El-Tanani, M., Patni, M. A., Rehman, A., Irshad, S. M., Raheem, R., Junais, E., John, A. A., Rassal, R. Y., Kumari, R., et al. (2026) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-026-05515-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“PCSK9 inhibitors have proven their effectiveness but their frequent injections and expensive price have restricted their acceptance by healthcare providers [78, 79].”
Oral PCSK9 inhibitors for elevated LDL-C: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Karthikeyan, A., Karp, A., Maliha, M., Kharawala, A., Mangalesh, S., Shah, P., Modak, V., Alper, A., Doshi, A., Murli, H., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101659 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Navar, A. M., Taylor, B., Mulder, H., Fievitz, E., Monda, K. L., Fievitz, A., Maya, J. F., López, J. A. G., & Peterson, E. D.
- Affiliations
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Amgen (United States) (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Symphony Health, Phoenix, Arizona
- Venue
- JAMA Cardiology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-11-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1217
- ISSN
- 2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5963012
- OpenAlex
- W2759629908
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL133416)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- PCSK9 inhibitors, prior authorization, prescription drug coverage, out-of-pocket costs, copayments, access to medicines, pharmacy benefit managers, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, LDL cholesterol, statin use, hypercholesterolemia, medication use, financial barriers to treatment
- MeSH terms
- Proprotein Convertase 9, Prior Authorization, PCSK9 Inhibitors, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Anticholesteremic Agents, Health Expenditures, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Cost Sharing, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Atherosclerosis, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Databases, Pharmaceutical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review