Cited by 261Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchGlobal Health and EpidemiologySepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Demographics, Care Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to Cardiac Intensive Care Units: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Prospective North American Multicenter Registry of Cardiac Critical Illness

Open access

Abstract

Importance: Single-center and claims-based studies have described substantial changes in the landscape of care in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Professional societies have recommended research to guide evidence-based CICU redesigns. Objective: To characterize patients admitted to contemporary, advanced CICUs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study established the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN), an investigator-initiated multicenter network of 16 advanced, tertiary CICUs in the United States and Canada. For 2 months in each CICU, data for consecutive admissions were submitted to the central data coordinating center (TIMI Study Group). The data were collected and analyzed between September 2017 and 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographics, diagnoses, management, and outcomes. Results: Of 3049 participants, 1132 (37.1%) were women, 797 (31.4%) were individuals of color, and the median age was 65 years (25th and 75th percentiles, 55-75 years). Between September 2017 and September 2018, 3310 admissions were included, among which 2557 (77.3%) were for primary cardiac problems, 337 (10.2%) for postprocedural care, 253 (7.7%) for mixed general and cardiac problems, and 163 (4.9%) for overflow from general medical ICUs. When restricted to the initial 2 months of medical CICU admissions for each site, the primary analysis population included 3049 admissions with a high burden of noncardiovascular comorbidities. The top 2 CICU admission diagnoses were acute coronary syndrome (969 [31.8%]) and heart failure (567 [18.6%]); however, the proportion of acute coronary syndrome was highly variable across centers (15%-57%). The primary indications for CICU care included respiratory insufficiency (814 [26.7%]), shock (643 [21.1%]), unstable arrhythmia (521 [17.1%]), and cardiac arrest (265 [8.7%]). Advanced CICU therapies or monitoring were required for 1776 patients (58.2%), including intravenous vasoactive medications (1105 [36.2%]), invasive hemodynamic monitoring (938 [30.8%]), and mechanical ventilation (652 [21.4%]). The overall CICU mortality rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 7.3%-9.3%). The CICU indications that were associated with the highest mortality rates were cardiac arrest (101 [38.1%]), cardiogenic shock (140 [30.6%]), and the need for renal replacement therapy (51 [34.5%]). Notably, patients admitted solely for postprocedural observation or frequent monitoring had a mortality rate of 0.2% to 0.4%. Conclusions and Relevance: In a contemporary network of tertiary care CICUs, respiratory failure and shock predominated indications for admission and carried a poor prognosis. While patterns of practice varied considerably between centers, a substantial, low-risk population was identified. Multicenter collaborative networks, such as the CCCTN, could be used to help redesign cardiac critical care and to test new therapeutic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2467

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Morrow, 2012, Evolution of critical care cardiology: transformation of the cardiovascular intensive care unit and the emerging need for new medical staffing and training models: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association., Circulation, 126, 1408, 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826890b0 · DOI
  2. Katz, 2010, Evolution of the coronary care unit: clinical characteristics and temporal trends in healthcare delivery and outcomes., Crit Care Med, 38, 375, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0a63 · DOI
  3. Ratcliffe, 2014, Mortality in the coronary care unit., Coron Artery Dis, 25, 60, 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000043 · DOI
  4. Holland, 2017, Acute noncardiovascular illness in the cardiac intensive care unit., J Am Coll Cardiol, 69, 1999, 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.033 · DOI
  5. Watson, Prospective registry of cardiac critical illness in a modern tertiary care cardiac intensive care unit [published online July 1, 2018]., Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care
  6. Sinha, 2017, Changes in primary non-cardiac diagnoses over time among elderly cardiac intensive care unit patients in the United States., Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 10, e003616, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003616 · DOI
  7. Wong, 2017, Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology position Statement on the optimal care of the postarrest patient., Can J Cardiol, 33, 1, 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.10.021 · DOI
  8. Bonnefoy-Cudraz, 2018, Editor’s choice—acute cardiovascular care association position paper on intensive cardiovascular care units: an update on their definition, structure, organisation and function., Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 7, 80, 10.1177/2048872617724269 · DOI
  9. van Diepen, 2015, The unmet need for addressing cardiac issues in intensive care research., Crit Care Med, 43, 128, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000609 · DOI
  10. Katz, 2016, The genesis, maturation, and future of critical care cardiology., J Am Coll Cardiol, 68, 67, 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.036 · DOI
  11. Ferreira, 2001, Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients., JAMA, 286, 1754, 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Killip, 1967, Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: a two year experience with 250 patients., Am J Cardiol, 20, 457, 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90023-9 · DOI
  13. Benjamin, 2018, Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association., Circulation, 137, e67, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558 · DOI · Paper page
  14. O’Gara, 2015, COCATS 4 Task Force 13: training in critical care cardiology., J Am Coll Cardiol, 65, 1877, 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.027 · DOI
  15. van Diepen, 2018, The high cost of critical care unit over-utilization for patients with NSTE ACS., Am Heart J, 202, 84, 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.05.003 · DOI
  16. Alviar, 2018, Positive pressure ventilation in the cardiac intensive care unit., J Am Coll Cardiol, 72, 1532, 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.074 · DOI · Paper page
  17. O’Malley, 2013, Organization and staffing practices in US cardiac intensive care units: a survey on behalf of the American Heart Association Writing Group on the Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology., Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2, 3, 10.1177/2048872612472063 · DOI
  18. van Diepen, 2017, Organizational structure, staffing, resources, and educational initiatives in cardiac intensive care units in the United States: an American Heart Association Acute Cardiac Care Committee and American College of Cardiology Critical care Cardiology Working Group cross sectional survey., Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 10, e003864, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003864 · DOI
  19. Vincent, 1998, Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on “sepsis-related problems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine., Crit Care Med, 26, 1793, 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Bohula, E. A., Katz, J. N., van Diepen, S., Alviar, C. L., Baird-Zars, V. M., Park, J.-G., Barnett, C. F., Bhattal, G., Barsness, G. W., Burke, J. A., Cremer, P. C., Cruz, J., Daniels, L. B., DeFilippis, A., Granger, C. B., Hollenberg, S., Horowitz, J. M., Keller, N., Kontos, M. C., Lawler, P. R., Menon, V., Metkus, T. S., Ng, J., Orgel, R., Overgaard, C. B., Phreaner, N., Roswell, R. O., Schulman, S. P., Snell, R. J., Solomon, M. A., Ternus, B., Tymchak, W., Vikram, F., Morrow, D. A., & for the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Lehigh Valley Health Network (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Cooper University Hospital (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Bohula, Erin A.
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
928
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963718678
Cited by
261
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 3
FWCI
18.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
cardiac intensive care unit, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, vasoactive drugs, mechanical circulatory support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO weaning, length of hospital stay, patient demographics, post-procedural care, respiratory failure
MeSH terms
Aged, Canada, Coronary Care Units, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Diseases, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Survival Rate, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, Risk Assessment, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review