Cited by 68Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyParaoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms

Joint Genetic Inhibition of PCSK9 and CETP and the Association With Coronary Artery Disease: A Factorial Mendelian Randomization Study

Open access
Cupido, Arjen J., Reeskamp, Laurens F., Hingorani, Aroon D., Finan, Chris, Asselbergs, Folkert W., Hovingh, G. Kees, Schmidt, Amand F.·2022·JAMA Cardiology

Abstract

Importance: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition (CETP) has been shown to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Current LDL-C target attainment is low, and novel phase 3 trials are underway to investigate whether CETP inhibitors result in reduction of cardiovascular disease risk in high-risk patients who may be treated with PCSK9-inhibiting agents. Objective: To explore the associations of combined reduction of CETP and PCSK9 concentrations with risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and other clinical and safety outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two-sample 2 × 2 factorial Mendelian randomization study in a general population sample that includes data for UK Biobank participants of European ancestry. Exposures: Separate genetic scores were constructed for CETP and PCSK9 plasma protein concentrations, which were combined to determine the associations of combined genetically reduced CETP and PCSK9 concentrations with disease. Main Outcomes and Measures: Blood lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, blood pressure, CAD, age-related macular degeneration, type 2 diabetes, any stroke and ischemic stroke, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, asthma, and multiple sclerosis. Results: Data for 425 354 UKB participants were included; the median (IQR) age was 59 years (51-64), and 229 399 (53.9%) were female. The associations of lower CETP and lower PCSK9 concentrations with CAD are similar when scaled per 10-mg/dL reduction in LDL-C concentrations (CETP: odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81; PCSK9: OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.79). Combined exposure to lower CETP and PCSK9 concentrations was associated with an additive magnitude with lipids and all outcomes, and we did not observe any nonadditive interactions, most notably for LDL-C (CETP: effect size, -1.11 mg/dL; 95% CI, -1.40 to -0.82; PCSK9: effect size, -2.13 mg/dL; 95% CI, -2.43 to -1.84; combined: effect size, -3.47 mg/dL; 95% CI, -3.76 to -3.18; P = .34 for interaction) and CAD (CETP: OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.00; PCSK9: OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.97; combined: OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.93; P = .83 for interaction). In addition, when corrected for multiple testing, lower CETP concentrations were associated with increased age-related macular degeneration (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.19). Conclusions and Relevance: Our results suggest that joint inhibition of CETP and PCSK9 has additive effects on lipid traits and disease risk, including a lower risk of CAD. Further research may explore whether a combination of CETP- and PCSK9-related therapeutics can benefit high-risk patients who are unable to reach treatment targets with existing options.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2333

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study using the UK Biobank cohort did not find that PCSK9, either protein or genotypes, is associated with AD risk.

    “A study using the UK Biobank (UKBB) cohort did not find that PCSK9, either protein or genotypes, is associated with AD risk [26].”

    From Blood PCSK9 Impacts Alzheimer's Disease Risk in an <i>APOE</i> Genotype‐Dependent Manner: A Prospective Cohort Study (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Methods (page unavailable) say the UK Biobank analysis investigated Alzheimer disease using genetic scores for predicted PCSK9 concentrations. The Results (page unavailable) report an association for PCSK9 with coronary artery disease after correction for multiple testing, but not with Alzheimer disease. The study did not directly test measured PCSK9 protein concentrations against Alzheimer disease risk, so the protein part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [1]Ference BA, Bhatt DL, Catapano AL, et al. Association of genetic variants related to combined exposure to lower low-density lipoproteins and lower systolic blood pressure with lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2019;322(14):1381-1391. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, et al. ; Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration . Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670-1681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Schmidt AF, Carter JL, Pearce LS, et al. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. ; Authors/Task Force Members; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); ESC National Cardiac Societies . 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis. 2019;290(August):140-205. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Zafrir B, Egbaria A, Stein N, Elis A, Saliba W. PCSK9 inhibition in clinical practice: treatment patterns and attainment of lipid goals in a large health maintenance organization. J Clin Lipidol. 2021;15(1):202-211.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Hollstein T, Kassner U, Grenkowitz T, Schumann F, Bobbert T, Steinhagen-Thiessen E. PCSK9 inhibitors in a German single-center clinical practice: real-world treatment of patients at high cardiovascular risk over 68 weeks. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021;21(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00411-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Ray KK, Molemans B, Schoonen WM, et al. ; DA VINCI study . EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(11):1279-1289. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Bruckert E, Parhofer KG, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, et al. Proportion of high-risk/very high-risk patients in Europe with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at target according to European guidelines: a systematic review. Adv Ther. 2020;37(5):1724-1736. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01285-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [9]Chapman MJ, Le Goff W, Guerin M, Kontush A. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: at the heart of the action of lipid-modulating therapy with statins, fibrates, niacin, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(2):149-164. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  10. [10]Schmidt AF, Hunt NB, Gordillo-Marañón M, et al. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) as a drug target for cardiovascular disease. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5640. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25703-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [12]Black DM, Miller M, Heinonen TM, Zhang G. Advancing beyond failed high-density lipoprotein clinical trials to pharmacogenetic studies of ADCY9 and cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021;78(4):496-500. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [13]Nordestgaard LT, Christoffersen M, Lauridsen BK, et al. Long-term benefits and harms associated with genetic cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiency in the general population. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(1):55-64. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [14]Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JAC, Timpson N, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med. 2008;27(8):1133-1163. doi: 10.1002/sim.3034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  14. [15]Rees JMB, Foley CN, Burgess S. Factorial Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants to assess interactions. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(4):1147-1158. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [16]Pott J, Schlegel V, Teren A, et al. Genetic regulation of PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) plasma levels and its impact on atherosclerotic vascular disease phenotypes. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11(5):e001992. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.001992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [17]Blauw LL, Noordam R, Soidinsalo S, et al. Mendelian randomization reveals unexpected effects of CETP on the lipoprotein profile. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(3):422-431. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0301-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [18]Prins BP, Kuchenbaecker KB, Bao Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of health-related biomarkers in the UK Household Longitudinal Study reveals novel associations. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10812-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [21]Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562(7726):203-209. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  19. [22]Schmidt AF, Hingorani AD, Jefferis BJ, White J, Groenwold R, Dudbridge F; UCLEB Consortium . Comparison of variance estimators for meta-analysis of instrumental variable estimates. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(6):1975-1986. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [24]Wickham H; Springer . ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Accessed July 2, 2020. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319242750
  21. [27]Holmes MV, Ala-Korpela M. What is ‘LDL cholesterol’? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(4):197-198. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0157-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [30]Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies: a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(32):2459-2472. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  23. [31]Colijn JM, den Hollander AI, Demirkan A, et al. ; European Eye Epidemiology Consortium; EYE-RISK Consortium . Increased high-density lipoprotein levels associated with age-related macular degeneration: evidence from the EYE-RISK and European Eye Epidemiology Consortia. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(3):393-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [36]de Carvalho LSF, Campos AM, Sposito AC. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis with over 96,000 patient-Years. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):364-367. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  25. [37]Schwartz GG, Leiter LA, Ballantyne CM, et al. Dalcetrapib reduces risk of new-onset diabetes in patients with coronary heart disease. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(5):1077-1084. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [38]Menon V, Kumar A, Patel DR, et al. Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1):e000943. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [39]Christen T, Trompet S, Noordam R, et al. ; NEO study . Mendelian randomization analysis of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and subclinical atherosclerosis: a population-based study. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12(1):137-144.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2017.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [41]Võsa U, Claringbould A, Westra HJ, et al. Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression. Nat Genet. 2021;53(9):1300-1310. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00913-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  29. [42]Davies NM, Holmes MV, Davey Smith G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ. 2018;362:k601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  30. [43]Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311(7003):485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cupido, A. J., Reeskamp, L. F., Hingorani, A. D., Finan, C., Asselbergs, F. W., Hovingh, G. K., & Schmidt, A. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Health Data Research UK (GB)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2022-09-01
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
955
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289593992
Cited by
68
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR202383)
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/18/50/33837)
  • Rosetrees Trust (M202-F2)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms
Keywords
PCSK9, cholesteryl ester transfer protein, coronary artery disease, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, lipid-lowering therapy, cardiovascular risk, lipoprotein concentration, blood pressure, age-related macular degeneration, type 2 diabetes, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, asthma
MeSH terms
Proprotein Convertase 9, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Genetic Variation, Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review