Cited by 1,047Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismParaoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms

Effects of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

Open access
The HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease remain at high risk for cardiovascular events despite effective statin-based treatment of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. The inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) by anacetrapib reduces LDL cholesterol levels and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. However, trials of other CETP inhibitors have shown neutral or adverse effects on cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 30,449 adults with atherosclerotic vascular disease who were receiving intensive atorvastatin therapy and who had a mean LDL cholesterol level of 61 mg per deciliter (1.58 mmol per liter), a mean non-HDL cholesterol level of 92 mg per deciliter (2.38 mmol per liter), and a mean HDL cholesterol level of 40 mg per deciliter (1.03 mmol per liter). The patients were assigned to receive either 100 mg of anacetrapib once daily (15,225 patients) or matching placebo (15,224 patients). The primary outcome was the first major coronary event, a composite of coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 4.1 years, the primary outcome occurred in significantly fewer patients in the anacetrapib group than in the placebo group (1640 of 15,225 patients [10.8%] vs. 1803 of 15,224 patients [11.8%]; rate ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 0.97; P=0.004). The relative difference in risk was similar across multiple prespecified subgroups. At the trial midpoint, the mean level of HDL cholesterol was higher by 43 mg per deciliter (1.12 mmol per liter) in the anacetrapib group than in the placebo group (a relative difference of 104%), and the mean level of non-HDL cholesterol was lower by 17 mg per deciliter (0.44 mmol per liter), a relative difference of -18%. There were no significant between-group differences in the risk of death, cancer, or other serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease who were receiving intensive statin therapy, the use of anacetrapib resulted in a lower incidence of major coronary events than the use of placebo. (Funded by Merck and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN48678192 ; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01252953 ; and EudraCT number, 2010-023467-18 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1706444

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no evidence from randomized trials that therapeutically increasing plasma HDL-C reduces cardiovascular event risk.

    “Furthermore, there is no evidence from randomized trials that therapeutically increasing plasma HDL-C reduces the risk of CV events [63-67].”
  • In ACCELERATE and REVEAL, CETP inhibitors more than doubled HDL-C but did not reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events beyond that expected from modest ApoB reductions.

    “Similarly, in the Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High-Risk for Vascular Outcomes (ACCELERATE) and Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib Through Lipid Modification (REVEAL) trials, treatment with CETP inhibitors more than doubled HDL-C levels, but did not appear to reduce the risk of ASCVD events beyond”
  • Evacetrapib raises HDL cholesterol by 130% and lowers LDL cholesterol by 37%, and the ACCELERATE trial was terminated due to futility.

    “Evacetrapib, which raises HDL-C levels by 130% and lowers LDL-C by 37%, was studied in the ACCELERATE trial [63], which was terminated due to futility.”
  • The CETP inhibitors dalcetrapib and evacetrapib showed no clinical benefit in their respective clinical studies.

    “The CETP inhibitors dalcetrapib (in > 30 000 patients with recent ACS [65]) and evacetrapib (in > 12 000 high-risk patients [63]) were investigated in 2012 and 2017, respectively. Neither clinical study was able to show any clinical benefit associated with CETP inhibitors [65].”
  • Colocalization can be used to test for such bias, but can suffer from issues of lack of power and/or availability of suitable data from relevant tissues.

    “Colocalization, which is a statistical approach that quantifies the extent to which two traits share the same underlying causal variant, and thus can be used to infer vertical pleiotropy 83-85 , can be used to test for such bias 86 , but can suffer from issues of lack of power and/or availability of suitable data from relevant tissues.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
The HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-09-28
Volume
377
Issue
13
Pages
1217-1227
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2762777606
Cited by
1,047
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 195 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
137.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0513-10139, NF-SI-0508-10299, RC-PG-0407-10054)
  • British Heart Foundation (FS/14/55/30806)
  • Versus Arthritis (20639, 18475)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms
Keywords
anacetrapib, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition, atherosclerosis, coronary events, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, coronary death, HDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, atorvastatin, statin therapy, cardiovascular risk reduction, serious adverse events, cancer risk, drug safety, subgroup analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Incidence, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Oxazolidinones, Atherosclerosis, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review