Cited by 22Dermatology and Skin DiseasesDigital Imaging in MedicineMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Visualization of Patients’ Skin Lesions on Their Smartphones: A New Step During Dermatology Visits

Open access
Hubiche, Thomas, Valério, Laure, Boralevi, Franck, Mahe, Emmanuel, Bodemer Skandalis, Christine, Phan, Alice, del Giudice, Pascal, for the Research Group of the French Society of Pediatric Dermatology (Groupe de Recherche de la Société Française de Dermatologie Pédiatrique)·2016·JAMA Dermatology

Abstract

Bad Average GoodTo show the picture to the physician Flare up of the skin disease Modification of a chronic skin disease Modification of skin lesions Nonmedical purpose (family picture...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2977

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAF images taken prior to in-person evaluation changed treatment decisions in 36% of patients.

    “Hubiche et al [6] found that SAF images taken prior to in-person evaluation changed treatment decisions in 36% of patients (Table 2).”

    From Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results passage (indexed under Abstract; page not provided) reports that smartphone photographs changed treatment in 44 of 124 patients (35.5%) for whom the photographs provided additional information. The study included 162 patients overall, so the claim omits the denominator that limits the 36% figure. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Low-quality images comprised approximately 10% to 40% of all patient-submitted photographs.

    “Other studies with similar experimental setups have observed that low-quality images comprised approximately 10% to 40% of all patient-submitted photographs [6-8].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hubiche, T., Valério, L., Boralevi, F., Mahe, E., Bodemer Skandalis, C., Phan, A., del Giudice, P., & for the Research Group of the French Society of Pediatric Dermatology (Groupe de Recherche de la Société Française de Dermatologie Pédiatrique)
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Fréjus Saint-Raphaël (FR)
  • Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Université Victor Ségalen, Bordeaux, France
  • Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Victor Dupouy, Argenteuil, France
  • Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Necker–Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Infectious and Dermatology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal (CHI) Fréjus Saint Raphaël, Fréjus, France
Corresponding author
Hubiche, Thomas
Venue
JAMA Dermatology
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
152
Issue
1
Pages
95
ISSN
2168-6068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1891434142
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
skin lesions, smartphone photography, telemedicine, dermatology, patient-physician communication, chronic skin disease, flare-ups
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dermatology, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Skin Diseases, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review