Creation of an Internal Teledermatology Store-and-Forward System in an Existing Electronic Health Record: A Pilot Study in a Safety-Net Public Health and Hospital System
Open accessAbstract
Importance: External store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology systems operate separately from the primary health record and have many limitations, including care fragmentation, inadequate communication among clinicians, and privacy and security concerns, among others. Development of internal SAF workflows within existing electronic health records (EHRs) should be the standard for large health care organizations for delivering high-quality dermatologic care, improving access, and capturing other telemedicine benchmark data. Epic EHR software (Epic Systems Corporation) is currently one of the most widely used EHR system in the United States, and development of a successful SAF workflow within it is needed. Objectives: To develop an SAF teledermatology workflow within the Epic system, the existing EHR system of Parkland Health and Hospital System (Dallas, Texas), assess its effectiveness in improving access to care, and validate its reliability; and to evaluate the system's ability to capture meaningful outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Electronic consults were independently evaluated by 2 board-certified dermatologists, who provided diagnoses and treatment plans to primary care physicians (PCPs). Results were compared with in-person referrals from May to December 2013 from the same clinic (a community outpatient clinic in a safety-net public hospital system). Patients were those 18 years or older with dermatologic complaints who would have otherwise been referred to dermatology clinic. Main Outcomes and Measures: Median time to evaluation; percentage of patients evaluated by a dermatologist through either teledermatology or in-person compared with the previous year. Results: Seventy-nine teledermatology consults were placed by 6 PCPs from an outpatient clinic between May and December 2014; 57 (74%) were female and their mean (SD) age was 47.0 (12.4) years. Teledermatology reduced median time to evaluation from 70.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 33.25-83.0 days) to 0.5 days (IQR, 0.172-0.94 days) and median time to treatment from 73.5 to 3.0 days compared with in-person dermatology visits. Overall, a greater percentage of patients (120 of 144 [83.3%]) were evaluated by a dermatologist through either teledermatology or in-person during the 2014 study period compared with the previous year (111 of 173 [64.2%]). Primary care physicians followed management recommendations 93% of the time. Conclusions and Relevance: Epic-based SAF teledermatology can improve access to dermatologic care in a public safety-net hospital setting. We hope that the system will serve as a model for other health care organizations wanting to create SAF teledermatology workflows within the Epic EHR system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Asynchronous consultation resulted in substantially reduced waiting periods for dermatologic care compared to traditional referral systems in safety-net health care systems.
“All of the studies found that asynchronous consultation resulted in substantially reduced waiting periods for dermatologic care compared to traditional referral systems [26-29].”
From Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: A systematic review
Warshaw, E. M., Hillman, Y. J., Greer, N. L., Hagel, E. M., MacDonald, R., Rutks, I. R., & Wilt, T. J. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.026 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms
Warshaw, E. M., Lederle, F. A., Grill, J. P., Gravely, A. A., Bangerter, A. K., Fortier, L. A., Bohjanen, K. A., Chen, K., Lee, P. K., Rabinovitz, H. S., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.032 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Nelson, C. A., Takeshita, J., Wanat, K. A., Bream, K. D. W., Holmes, J. H., Koenig, H. C., Roth, R. R., Vuppalapati, A., James, W. D., & Kovarik, C. L. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.058 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Pediatric teledermatology: observations based on 429 consults
Chen, T. S., Goldyne, M. E., Mathes, E. F. D., Frieden, I. J., & Gilliam, A. E. (2010) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.05.039 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
(2013) · PubMed · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Nelson, C. A., Wanat, K. A., Roth, R. R., James, W. D., Kovarik, C., & Takeshita, J. (2015) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.011 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Adherence to Teledermatology Recommendations by Primary Health Care Professionals
Martin, I., Aphivantrakul, P. P., Chen, K., & Chen, S. C. (2015) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1884 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [10]10. Brieva A, Philips N, Tejedor R, et al. Molecular basis for the regenerative properties of a secretion of the mollusk Cryptomphalus aspersa. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;21(1):15-22.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnostic reliability in teledermatology: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
Bourkas, A. N., Barone, N., Bourkas, M. E. C., Mannarino, M., Fraser, R. D. J., Lorincz, A., Wang, S. C., & Ramirez-GarciaLuna, J. L. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068207 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
Jiang, S. W., Flynn, M. S., Kwock, J. T., & Nicholas, M. W. (2022) · JMIR Dermatology · doi:10.2196/37517 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Several urban programs have used images obtained during PCP visits for SAF teledermatology consultation in safety-net health care systems [26-29].”
BackgroundImproving access to care through the establishment of a local, teledermatology network
Costello, C. M., Cumsky, H. J. L., Maly, C. J., Harvey, J. A., Buras, M. R., Pallagi, P. J., Gustaveson, A. L., Singh, D. P., Nelson, S. A., Pittelkow, M. R., et al. (2020) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0051 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Abbott, L. M., Miller, R., Janda, M., Bennett, H., Taylor, M. L., Arnold, C., Shumack, S., Soyer, H. P., & Caffery, L. J. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ajd.13249 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Kim, G. E., Afanasiev, O. K., O’Dell, C., Sharp, C., & Ko, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x18799805 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Martyin, K., Meznerics, F. A., Bokor, L. A., Szabó, B., Hegyi, P., Kiss, N., & Bánvölgyi, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1739592 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carter, Z. A., Goldman, S., Anderson, K., Li, X., Hynan, L. S., Chong, B. F., & Dominguez, A. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Parkland Health & Hospital System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dominguez, Arturo R.
- Venue
- JAMA Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-07-01
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 644
- ISSN
- 2168-6068 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5817461
- OpenAlex
- W2606404605
- Semantic Scholar
- 85f51b77a346bf8521bc2142bc2c5d6da264912f
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- teledermatology, store-and-forward telemedicine, electronic health records, Epic EHR, dermatological care, access to dermatologic care, primary care referral, safety-net hospitals, health information exchange, care fragmentation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Dermatology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Primary Health Care, Public Health, Referral and Consultation, Skin Diseases, Software, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Telemedicine, Workflow, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review