Cited by 114Academic Publishing and Open AccessMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Time to publication among completed clinical trials

Open access
Ross, Joseph S., Mocanu, Marian, Lampropulos, Julianna F., Tse, Tony, Krumholz, Harlan M.·2013·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Prior studies have shown that 25% to 50% of clinical trials are never published.[1][2][3][4] However, among those published, we know little about the length of time required for publication in the peer-reviewed biomedical literature after study completion.Ioannidis previously demonstrated that a sample of randomized phase 2 and 3 trials conducted between 1986 and 1996 required nearly 2.5 years for publication, 5 while our more recent study of National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded trials found that average time to publication was almost two years.4 We sought to determine time to publication for a recent and representative sample of trials published in 2009. METHODSWe examined clinical trials published during the 2009 calendar year that were indexed via MEDLINE and linked to a ClinicalTrials.govidentifier (NCT Number).6 We excluded articles that were not the first publication reporting on the clinical trial by reviewing article text for citations to and searching MEDLINE for earlier trial publications.We imputed completion dates based on the subject enrollment dates and the longest period of follow-up required for any outcome measure reported in the article.For trials without enrollment dates, we used the completion date provided on ClinicalTrials.gov;

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.136

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, J. S., Mocanu, M., Lampropulos, J. F., Tse, T., & Krumholz, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ross, Joseph S.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2013-05-13
Volume
173
Issue
9
Pages
825
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995839006
Cited by
114
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (K08 AG032886)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN276201000788P)
  • National Institute on Aging (K08AG032886)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL105270)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
time to publication, clinical trials, trial completion, randomized controlled trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, biomedical literature
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Time Factors, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review