Cited by 159Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Nutritional Support and Outcomes in Malnourished Medical Inpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Bally, Martina R., Blaser Yildirim, Prisca Z., Bounoure, Lisa, Gloy, Viktoria L., Mueller, Beat, Briel, Matthias, Schuetz, Philipp·2016·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance During acute illness, nutritional therapy is widely used for medical inpatients with malnutrition or at risk for malnutrition. Yet, to our knowledge, no comprehensive trial has demonstrated that this approach is effective and beneficial for patients. Objective To assess the effects of nutritional support on outcomes of medical inpatients with malnutrition or at risk for malnutrition in a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Data sources The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. The study dates were October 5, 1982, to April 30, 2014, in various (mostly European) countries. The dates of our analysis were March 10, 2015, to September 16, 2015. Study selection Based on a prespecified Cochrane protocol, we systematically searched RCTs investigating the effects of nutritional support (including counseling and oral and enteral feeding) in medical inpatients compared with a control group. Data extraction Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Disagreement was resolved by consensus. Main outcomes and measures The primary study outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital-acquired infections, nonelective readmissions, functional outcome, length of hospital stay, daily caloric and protein intake, and weight change. Results We included 22 RCTs with a total of 3736 participants. Heterogeneity across RCTs was high, with overall low study quality and mostly unclear risk of bias. Intervention group patients…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6587

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive effects of ONS on dietary intake and body weight, and reduced risk of complications and readmissions were reported, whereas length of hospital stay and mortality risk were not significantly reduced.

    “Altogether, positive effects of ONS on dietary intake (115, 116, 119, 121) and BW (115, 116, 119, 121), and reduced risk of complications (121) and readmissions (115, 120, 121) were reported, whereas the length of hospital stay (114, 115, 121) and mortality risk (114-116, 119, 121) were not significantly reduced.”
  • A systematic literature search found six high-quality SLRs that have assessed the efficacy of ONS versus usual care in older persons.

    “A systematic literature search found six high-quality SLRs that have assessed the efficacy of ONS versus usual care in older persons (114-121).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 159

Authors
Bally, M. R., Blaser Yildirim, P. Z., Bounoure, L., Gloy, V. L., Mueller, B., Briel, M., & Schuetz, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • General Medicine, Dr M. Deppeler, Zollikofen, Switzerland
  • University Department of Medicine, Clinic for Endocrinology/Metabolism/Clinical Nutrition, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland2Medical Faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
176
Issue
1
Pages
43
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2215014536
Cited by
159
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14
FWCI
16.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
nutritional support, malnutrition, medical inpatients, enteral nutrition, nosocomial infections, mortality, length of hospital stay, functional outcome, weight gain, energy intake, protein intake, acute illness, risk of bias, trial heterogeneity, quality of evidence, future research directions, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Energy Intake, Counseling, Cross Infection, Enteral Nutrition, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Patient Readmission, Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Nutritional Support, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review