Effectiveness and Value of Integrating Behavioral Health Into Primary Care
Abstract
This Evidence to Practice review assesses the comparative effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and budget implications of integrating behavioral health services into primary care settings compared with usual care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integration of mental health into primary health care services is an important strategy to help bridge the gap in specialized mental health services and to improve acceptability, access and sustainability of services and decrease stigma.
“Integration of mental health into primary health care services has been identified as an important strategy to help bridge the gap in specialized mental health services and to improve the acceptability, access and sustainability of services together with decrease in the stigma associated with mental illness and mental health services [41–43].”
From The health response to the Rohingya refugee crisis post August 2017: Reflections from two years of health sector coordination in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
Cites
Collaborative Care for Depression: A Cumulative Meta-analysis and Review of Longer-term Outcomes
Gilbody, S. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.21.2314 · Cited by 1,340 · see citing works
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems
Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., Dickens, C., & Coventry, P. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006525.pub2 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Richards, D., Fletcher, J., & Sutton, A. (2006) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.023655 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kroenke, K., & Unutzer, J. (2017) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-016-3967-9 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Gilbody, S., Lewis, H., Adamson, J., Atherton, K., Bailey, D., Birtwistle, J., Bosanquet, K., Clare, E., Delgadillo, J., Ekers, D., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0130 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Jeffries, R., Abdi, H., Ali, M., Bhuiyan, A. T. M. R. H., El Shazly, M., Harlass, S., Ishtiak, A., Mazhar, M. K. A., Prajapati, M., Pang, Q. Y., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253013 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reed, S. J., Shore, K. K., & Tice, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Tice, Jeffrey A.
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-05-01
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 691
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321531171
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- behavioral health integration, primary care, comparative effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, usual care, mental health services, substance use disorders
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Primary Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
