Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generalizability of Clinical Trials of Novel Weight Loss Medications to the US Adult Population

Bessette, Lily G., Anderson, Timothy S.·2025·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

This cross-sectional study investigates the extent to which individuals meeting label criteria for novel weight loss medications may not have been included in pivotal trials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6340

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The benchmarked studies were expanded to clinically representative populations, addressing concerns about the limited generalizability of pivotal trials for newer GLP-1 receptor agonist-based therapies.

    “The benchmarked studies were then expanded to clinically representative populations, addressing concerns about the limited generalizability of pivotal trials for newer GLP-1 receptor agonist-based therapies.30”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wilding, 2021, Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity., N Engl J Med, 384, 989, 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Pi-Sunyer, 2015, A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management., N Engl J Med, 373, 11, 10.1056/NEJMoa1411892 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bessette, L. G., & Anderson, T. S.
Affiliations
  • School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
Volume
185
Issue
1
Pages
108
ISSN
2168-6106
Cited by
4
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review