The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival
Open accessAbstract
Importance: There is a lack of studies exploring the performance of a deep learning survival neural network in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Objectives: To compare the performances of DeepSurv, a deep learning survival neural network with a tumor, node, and metastasis staging system in the prediction of survival and test the reliability of individual treatment recommendations provided by the deep learning survival neural network. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based cohort study, a deep learning-based algorithm was developed and validated using consecutive cases of newly diagnosed stages I to IV NSCLC between January 2010 and December 2015 in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A total of 127 features, including patient characteristics, tumor stage, and treatment strategies, were assessed for analysis. The algorithm was externally validated on an independent test cohort, comprising 1182 patients with stage I to III NSCLC diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2013 in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Analysis began January 2018 and ended June 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The deep learning survival neural network model was compared with the tumor, node, and metastasis staging system for lung cancer-specific survival. The C statistic was used to assess the performance of models. A user-friendly interface was provided to facilitate the survival predictions and treatment recommendations of the deep learning survival neural network model. Results: Of 17 322 patients with NSCLC included in the study, 13 361 (77.1%) were white and the median (interquartile range) age was 68 (61-74) years. The majority of tumors were stage I disease (10 273 [59.3%]) and adenocarcinoma (11 985 [69.2%]). The median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 24 (10-43) months. There were 3119 patients who had lung cancer-related death during the follow-up period. The deep learning survival neural network model showed more promising results in the prediction of lung cancer-specific survival than the tumor, node, and metastasis stage on the test data set (C statistic = 0.739 vs 0.706). The population who received the recommended treatments had superior survival rates than those who received treatments not recommended (hazard ratio, 2.99; 95% CI, 2.49-3.59; P < .001), which was verified by propensity score-matched groups. The deep learning survival neural network model visualization was realized by a user-friendly graphic interface. Conclusions and Relevance: The deep learning survival neural network model shows potential benefits in prognostic evaluation and treatment recommendation with respect to lung cancer-specific survival. This novel analytical approach may provide reliable individual survival information and treatment recommendations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer statistics in China, 2015
Chen, W., Zheng, R., Baade, P. D., Zhang, S., Zeng, H., Bray, F., Jemal, A., Yu, X. Q., & He, J. (2016) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21338 · Cited by 17,038
Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images
Campanella, G., Hanna, M. G., Geneslaw, L., Miraflor, A., Werneck Krauss Silva, V., Busam, K. J., Brogi, E., Reuter, V. E., Klimstra, D. S., & Fuchs, T. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1 · Cited by 2,799
Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease
De Fauw, J., Ledsam, J. R., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Tomasev, N., Blackwell, S., Askham, H., Glorot, X., O’Donoghue, B., Visentin, D., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6 · Cited by 2,639
Katzman, J. L., Shaham, U., Cloninger, A., Bates, J., Jiang, T., & Kluger, Y. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0482-1 · Cited by 1,995
Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils
Hashimoto, D. A., Rosman, G., Rus, D., & Meireles, O. R. (2018) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002693 · Cited by 1,468
Kather, J. N., Pearson, A. T., Halama, N., Jäger, D., Krause, J., Loosen, S. H., Marx, A., Boor, P., Tacke, F., Neumann, U. P., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0462-y · Cited by 1,458 · cited 2×
“(%) Training SEER (test 1) CHINA (test 2) Age at diagnosis, median (range), y 68 (28-95) 68 (19-92) 60 (30-87) Sex Female 6657 (51.”
BackgroundThe International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project
Asamura, H., Chansky, K., Crowley, J., Goldstraw, P., Rusch, V. W., Vansteenkiste, J. F., Watanabe, H., Wu, Y.-L., Zielinski, M., Ball, D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0000000000000678 · Cited by 691
Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence
Liang, H., Tsui, B. Y., Ni, H., Valentim, C. C. S., Baxter, S. L., Liu, G., Cai, W., Kermany, D. S., Sun, X., Chen, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0335-9 · Cited by 659
Liang, W., Zhang, L., Jiang, G., Wang, Q., Liu, L., Liu, D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Z., Deng, Q., Xiong, X., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.56.6661 · Cited by 649
Self-citationDeep generative models of genetic variation capture the effects of mutations
Riesselman, A. J., Ingraham, J. B., & Marks, D. S. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0138-4 · Cited by 601
Cited by
Novel research and future prospects of artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and treatment
Zhang, C., Xu, J., Tang, R., Yang, J., Wang, W., Yu, X., & Shi, S. (2023) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-023-01514-5 · Cited by 148
Leivaditis, V., Maniatopoulos, A. A., Lausberg, H., Mulita, F., Papatriantafyllou, A., Liolis, E., Beltsios, E., Adamou, A., Kontodimopoulos, N., & Dahm, M. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14082729 · Cited by 76
Matsumoto, T., Walston, S. L., Walston, M., Kabata, D., Miki, Y., Shiba, M., & Ueda, D. (2022) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-022-00691-y · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- She, Y., Jin, Z., Wu, J., Deng, J., Zhang, L., Su, H., Jiang, G., Liu, H., Xie, D., Cao, N., Ren, Y., & Chen, C.
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2020-06-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e205842
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3031635948
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 16.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5842
- The paper
- She, Y., Jin, Z., Wu, J., Deng, J., Zhang, L., Su, H., Jiang, G., Liu, H., Xie, D., Cao, N., Ren, Y., & Chen, C. (2020). Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.