Cited by 15COVID-19 diagnosis using AIMachine Learning in HealthcareCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Deep Learning–Based Time-to-Death Prediction Model for COVID-19 Patients Using Clinical Data and Chest Radiographs

Open access
Matsumoto, Toshimasa, Walston, Shannon Leigh, Walston, Michael, Kabata, Daijiro, Miki, Yukio, Shiba, Masatsugu, Ueda, Daiju·2022·Journal of Digital Imaging

Abstract

Accurate estimation of mortality and time to death at admission for COVID-19 patients is important and several deep learning models have been created for this task. However, there are currently no prognostic models which use end-to-end deep learning to predict time to event for admitted COVID-19 patients using chest radiographs and clinical data. We retrospectively implemented a new artificial intelligence model combining DeepSurv (a multiple-perceptron implementation of the Cox proportional hazards model) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) using 1356 COVID-19 inpatients. For comparison, we also prepared DeepSurv only with clinical data, DeepSurv only with images (CNNSurv), and Cox proportional hazards models. Clinical data and chest radiographs at admission were used to estimate patient outcome (death or discharge) and duration to the outcome. The Harrel's concordance index (c-index) of the DeepSurv with CNN model was 0.82 (0.75-0.88) and this was significantly higher than the DeepSurv only with clinical data model (c-index = 0.77 (0.69-0.84), p = 0.011), CNNSurv (c-index = 0.70 (0.63-0.79), p = 0.001), and the Cox proportional hazards model (c-index = 0.71 (0.63-0.79), p = 0.001). These results suggest that the time-to-event prognosis model became more accurate when chest radiographs and clinical data were used together.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10278-022-00691-y

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic increased the number of COVID-19-related studies from Japan, with a significant increase in such research focusing on AI.

    “Furthermore, owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the number of COVID-19-related studies from Japan has increased [54–61], with a significant increase in such research focusing on AI [62–64].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [45]Lundberg SM and Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; Long Beach, California, USA: Curran Associates Inc.; 2017. p. 4768–4777.
  2. [52]Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK and Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsumoto, T., Walston, S. L., Walston, M., Kabata, D., Miki, Y., Shiba, M., & Ueda, D.
Affiliations
  • Osaka Metropolitan University (JP)
  • Center for Health Science Innovation, Osaka Metropolitan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ueda, Daiju
Venue
Journal of Digital Imaging
Published
2022-08-08
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
178-188
ISSN
  • 0897-1889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-727X
OpenAlex
W4292283910
Cited by
15
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K10415)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mortality prediction, chest radiograph, DeepSurv, convolutional neural networks, Cox proportional hazards model, time-to-event prediction, clinical data
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, COVID-19, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Radiography, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review