Cited by 29Academic Publishing and Open AccessMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Assessment of concordance and discordance among clinical studies posted as preprints and subsequently published in high-impact journals

Open access
Shi, Xiaoting, Ross, Joseph S., Amancharla, Nishita, Niforatos, Joshua D., Krumholz, Harlan M., Wallach, Joshua D.·2021·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines the concordance between clinical studies posted as preprints and subsequently published in high-impact journals, including key study characteristics, reported results, and study interpretations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2110

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results are aligned with previous assessments before covid-19 that study interpretations and other study details do not change importantly between preprints and their later publications in high impact journals.

    “Our results are also aligned with previous assessments before covid-19 that study interpretations and other study details do not change importantly between preprints and their later publications in high impact journals.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, X., Ross, J. S., Amancharla, N., Niforatos, J. D., Krumholz, H. M., & Wallach, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Wallach, Joshua D.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-03-18
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e212110
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137473078
Cited by
28
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K01AA028258)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
preprints, concordance, discordance, high-impact journals, study characteristics, study interpretation
MeSH terms
Clinical Studies as Topic, Preprints as Topic, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Publications, Journal Impact Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review