Cited by 38Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and AccessEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Incidence of Access to Ambulatory Mental Health Care Prior to a Psychiatric Emergency Department Visit Among Adults in Ontario, 2010-2018

Open access
Kurdyak, Paul, Gandhi, Sima, Holder, Laura, Rashid, Mohammed, Saunders, Natasha, Chiu, Maria, Guttmann, Astrid, Vigod, Simone·2021·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Psychiatric emergency department (ED) visits may be avoidable if individuals have access to adequate outpatient care, but the extent to which individuals use the ED itself as a key point of access is largely unknown. Objective: To describe the extent to which the ED is a first point of contact for mental health care among adults, and identify key factors associated with this outcome. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted from 2010 to 2018 in Ontario, Canada. Using health care administrative data, all individuals aged 16 years and older with an incident psychiatric ED visit were included. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2019 to February 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was no outpatient mental health or addictions contact in the 2 years preceding the incident ED visit. The study also measured predisposing (age, sex, immigrant status, comorbidity), enabling (neighborhood income, rurality, continuity of primary care), and need factors (diagnosis from incident ED visit) associated with the so-called first-contact ED visits, generating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs. Results: The cohort included 659 084 patients who visited the ED. Among these patients, 340 354 were female individuals (51.6%), and the mean (SD) age was 39.1 (18.5) years. The incident ED visit was a first contact for 298 924 individuals (45.4%). Patients who had increased odds of first-contact ED visits included older individuals (aged 65-84 years vs 16-24 years; aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.12-1.14), male individuals (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.13-1.15), immigrants (eg, economic class immigrant vs nonimmigrant status: aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.18-1.21), rural residents (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.21), and in those with minimal primary care (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.67-1.69). All diagnoses had a higher likelihood of first-contact ED visits than mood disorders, particularly substance and alcohol use disorders (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.65-1.68). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's results suggest that nearly half of incident psychiatric ED visits were first-contact visits, which may be avoidable. Targeted efforts to improve outpatient access should focus on populations with risk factors for first-contact ED presentations, including men, older adults, rural residents, those with poor primary care connectivity, and those with substance-related diagnoses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5902

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emergency departments are often the first point of contact to identify and address suicide risk across Canada, especially for youth and young adults.

    “Emergency departments (ED) are often the first point of contact to identify and address suicide risk across Canada, especially for youth and young adults [12, 13].”

    From Suicide among youth and young adults in Canada: bereaved parents' perspectives on the systems of care (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that EDs are increasingly a first point of contact for people seeking care for mental illnesses and addictions; the Discussion also identifies access barriers for transitional-age youth. The paper studies Ontario patients aged 16 and older, however, and does not establish that EDs identify and address suicide risk across Canada or that this role is especially pronounced for youth and young adults. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [2]Cherpitel CJ, Ye Y. Trends in alcohol- and drug-related emergency department and primary care visits: data from four U.S. national surveys (1995-2010). J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012; 73(3): 454- 458. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.454 22456250 PMC3316717 · DOI
  2. [3]Capp R, Hardy R, Lindrooth R, Wiler J. National trends in emergency department visits by adults with mental health disorders. J Emerg Med. 2016; 51(2): 131- 135.e1, e131. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.002 27614303 · DOI
  3. [4]Goldner EM, Jones W, Fang ML. Access to and waiting time for psychiatrist services in a Canadian urban area: a study in real time. Can J Psychiatry. 2011; 56(8): 474- 480. doi: 10.1177/070674371105600805 21878158 · DOI
  4. [6]Gill PJ, Saunders N, Gandhi S,. Emergency department as a first contact for mental health problems in children and youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017; 56(6): 475- 482.e4, e474. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.012 28545752 · DOI
  5. [7]Barker LC, Kurdyak P, Fung K, Matheson FI, Vigod S. Postpartum psychiatric emergency visits: a nested case-control study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016; 19(6): 1019- 1027. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0651-3 27511109 · DOI
  6. [9]Austin PC, Walraven C, Wodchis W, Newman A, Anderson GM. Using the Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada. Med Care. 2011. 49(10): 932- 9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215d5e2 21478773 PMC4617830 · DOI
  7. [10]Austin PC, Newman A, Kurdyak PA. Using the Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) to predict mortality in a population-based cohort of adults with schizophrenia in Ontario, Canada. Psychiatr Res. 2012. 196(1): 32- 7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.09.023 22364931 · DOI
  8. [11]Chiu M, Lebenbaum M, Lam K,. Describing the linkages of the immigration, refugees and citizenship Canada permanent resident data and vital statistics death registry to Ontario’s administrative health database. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16(1): 135. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0375-3 27769227 PMC5073414 · DOI
  9. [12]Steele LS, Glazier RH, Lin E, Evans M. Using administrative data to measure ambulatory mental health service provision in primary care. Med Care. 2004; 42(10): 960- 965. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200410000-00004 15377928 · DOI
  10. [13]Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995; 36(1): 1- 10. doi: 10.2307/2137284 7738325 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [14]Bullard MJ, Chan T, Brayman C, Warren D, Musgrave E, Unger B; Members of the CTAS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines. CJEM. 2014; 16(6): 485- 489. doi: 10.1017/S148180350000350X 25358280 · DOI
  12. [16]Vasiliadis HM, Lesage A, Adair C, Boyer R. Service use for mental health reasons: cross-provincial differences in rates, determinants, and equity of access. Can J Psychiatry. 2005; 50(10): 614- 619. doi: 10.1177/070674370505001007 16276852 · DOI
  13. [17]Pottick KJ, Bilder S, Vander Stoep A, Warner LA, Alvarez MF. US patterns of mental health service utilization for transition-age youth and young adults. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008; 35(4): 373- 389. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9080-4 18026842 · DOI
  14. [18]Toulany A, Stukel TA, Kurdyak P, Fu L, Guttmann A. Association of primary care continuity with outcomes following transition to adult care for adolescents with severe mental illness. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(8): e198415. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8415 31373654 PMC6681550 · DOI
  15. [19]Kirby JB, Zuvekas SH, Borsky AE, Ngo-Metzger Q. Rural residents with mental health needs have fewer care visits than urban counterparts. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38(12): 2057- 2060. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00369 31794321 · DOI
  16. [20]Han B, Compton WM, Blanco C, Colpe LJ. Prevalence, treatment, and unmet treatment needs of US adults with mental health and substance use disorders. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36(10): 1739- 1747. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0584 28971918 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [21]Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(2): 154- 161. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1601705 27410924 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [22]Wunderink A, Nienhuis FJ, Sytema S, Wiersma D. Treatment delay and response rate in first episode psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006; 113(4): 332- 339. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00685.x 16638078 · DOI
  19. [23]Schimmelmann BG, Huber CG, Lambert M, Cotton S, McGorry PD, Conus P. Impact of duration of untreated psychosis on pre-treatment, baseline, and outcome characteristics in an epidemiological first-episode psychosis cohort. J Psychiatr Res. 2008; 42(12): 982- 990. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.12.001 18199456 · DOI
  20. [24]Perkins DO, Gu H, Boteva K, Lieberman JA. Relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia: a critical review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162(10): 1785- 1804. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1785 16199825 · DOI
  21. [25]Simon GE, Stewart C, Yarborough BJ,. Mortality rates after the first diagnosis of psychotic disorder in adolescents and young adults. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018; 75(3): 254- 260. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4437 29387876 PMC5885951 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurdyak, P., Gandhi, S., Holder, L., Rashid, M., Saunders, N., Chiu, M., Guttmann, A., & Vigod, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Kurdyak, Paul
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-04-14
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e215902
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154268207
Cited by
38
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  • Hospital for Sick Children
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
psychiatric emergency department visits, barriers to mental health care, rural residence, immigrant status, neighborhood income, comorbidities, mental health service utilization, Ontario adults, health care access disparities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Ontario, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review