Cited by 80Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealthcare Policy and ManagementPsychiatric care and mental health services

Availability of Outpatient Care From Psychiatrists: A Simulated-Patient Study in Three U.S. Cities

Malowney, Monica, Keltz, Sarah, Fischer, Daniel, Boyd, J. Wesley·2015·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

Objectives The study examined availability of psychiatrists for outpatient appointments in three U.S. cities. Methods Posing as patients, investigators called 360 psychiatrists listed in a major insurer's database in Boston, Houston, and Chicago (N=120 per city) and attempted to make appointments. Callers claimed to have Blue Cross Blue Shield or Medicare or said they would pay out of pocket (N=120 per payer type, divided evenly across cities). Results In round 1 of calling, investigators were able to reach 119 of the 360 psychiatrists (33%). Of 216 unanswered calls, 36% were returned. After two calling rounds, appointments were made with 93 psychiatrists (26%). Significant differences were noted between cities but not between payer type. Conclusions Obtaining outpatient appointments with psychiatrists in three cities was difficult, irrespective of payer. RESULTS suggest that expanding insurance coverage alone may do little to improve access to psychiatrists-or worse, expansion might further overwhelm the capacity of available services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201400051

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insurance-provided search portals regularly surface results utilizing out of date directories and recommend providers who are neither appropriate for the client's needs, available, nor taking new clients.

    “Insurance-provided search portals, the most prevalent tool, regularly surface results utilizing out of date directories and recommend providers who are neither appropriate for the client’s needs, available, nor taking new clients.8-10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malowney, M., Keltz, S., Fischer, D., & Boyd, J. W.
Affiliations
Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
94-96
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2159810309
Cited by
79
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
access to mental health care, outpatient appointments, appointment scheduling, standardized patients, insurance coverage, Medicare, Blue Cross Blue Shield, health care access disparities, urban mental health services
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Appointments and Schedules, Boston, Chicago, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Psychiatry, Texas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review