Estimated Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against Omicron or Delta Symptomatic Infection and Severe Outcomes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Importance: The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including among individuals who have received 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, increased substantially following the emergence of the Omicron variant in Ontario, Canada. Understanding the estimated effectiveness of 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine against outcomes associated with Omicron and Delta infections may aid decision-making at the individual and population levels. Objective: To estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic infections due to the Omicron and Delta variants and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) associated with these infections. Design, Setting, and Participants: This test-negative case-control study used linked provincial databases for SARS-CoV-2 laboratory testing, reportable disease, COVID-19 vaccination, and health administration in Ontario, Canada. Participants were individuals aged 18 years or older who had COVID-19 symptoms or severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between December 6 and 26, 2021. Exposures: Receipt of 2 or 3 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and time since last dose. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were symptomatic Omicron or Delta infection and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) associated with infection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effectiveness of 2 or 3 COVID-19 vaccine doses by time since the latest dose compared with no vaccination. Estimated VE was calculated using the formula VE = (1 – [adjusted odds ratio]) × 100%. Results: Of 134 435 total participants, 16 087 were Omicron-positive cases (mean [SD] age, 36.0 [14.1] years; 8249 [51.3%] female), 4261 were Delta-positive cases (mean [SD] age, 44.2 [16.8] years; 2199 [51.6%] female), and 114 087 were test-negative controls (mean [SD] age, 42.0 [16.5] years; 67 884 [59.5%] female). Estimated VE against symptomatic Delta infection decreased from 89% (95% CI, 86%-92%) 7 to 59 days after a second dose to 80% (95% CI, 74%-84%) after 240 or more days but increased to 97% (95% CI, 96%-98%) 7 or more days after a third dose. Estimated VE against symptomatic Omicron infection was 36% (95% CI, 24%-45%) 7 to 59 days after a second dose and 1% (95% CI, –8% to 10%) after 180 days or longer, but 7 or more days after a third dose, it increased to 61% (95% CI, 56%-65%). Estimated VE against severe outcomes was high 7 or more days after a third dose for both Delta (99%; 95% CI, 98%-99%) and Omicron (95%; 95% CI, 87%-98%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, in contrast to high estimated VE against symptomatic Delta infection and severe outcomes after 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, estimated VE was modest and short term against symptomatic Omicron infection but better maintained against severe outcomes. A third dose was associated with improved estimated VE against symptomatic infection and with high estimated VE against severe outcomes for both variants. Preventing infection due to Omicron and potential future variants may require tools beyond the currently available vaccines.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
VE during Delta-dominant period was higher than during Omicron BA.1-dominant period for symptomatic infection.
“As documented in the literature [19,22,26], VE during the Delta-dominant period was higher compared to the Omicron BA.1-dominant period”
From Vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines against Delta and Omicron BA.1 symptomatic and severe COVID-19 outcomes in adults aged 50 years and over in France (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
The Results report higher estimated vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic Delta infection than against symptomatic Omicron infection, and the Discussion reiterates that comparison. The paper compares variants within the same December 2021 study period; it does not establish the claim as a comparison between separate Delta-dominant and Omicron BA.1-dominant periods. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe decrease in protection was substantially higher against Omicron BA.1 compared to Delta.
“this decrease in protection was substantially higher against Omicron BA.1 compared to Delta [3,8,12,19,26].”
From Vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines against Delta and Omicron BA.1 symptomatic and severe COVID-19 outcomes in adults aged 50 years and over in France (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
The Discussion reports that two-dose vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection was substantially lower for Omicron than for Delta, with a marked reduction over time. The paper’s comparison is for Omicron generally, not specifically BA.1; it also reports a much smaller difference for severe outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredReal-world vaccine effectiveness studies during Delta and Omicron circulation showed less vaccine-induced protection against Omicron than against Delta.
“Real-word VE studies published during the periods of circulation of these two variants showed differences in vaccine-induced protection against Delta and Omicron variants-related infections, with less protection against Omicron than Delta [18-22].”
Several studies have described a drop over time of two-dose vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection.
“Several studies have described a drop over time of two-dose vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection;”
Numerous studies conducted during the Omicron BA.1 period have reported an increase in VE against infection caused by this variant following a booster dose.
“Still, numerous studies conducted during the Omicron BA.1 period have reported an increase in VE against infection caused by this variant following a booster dose [19,26,32-35].”
Our results were comparable to those from studies in other countries.
“Nevertheless our results were comparable to those from studies in other countries [19,20,34].”
The findings were consistent with those of other studies of vaccine effectiveness against omicron infection.
“Notwithstanding these limitations, findings were consistent with those of other studies of vaccine effectiveness against omicron infection (BA.1 or BA.2 subvariants were not specified).27,32-36”
From Effects of Previous Infection and Vaccination on Symptomatic Omicron Infections (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 356
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [6]Dejnirattisai W, Shaw RH, Supasa P,. Reduced neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron B.1.1.529 variant by post-immunisation serum. Lancet. Published online December 20, 2021. doi: 10.1101/2021.12.10.21267534 34942101 PMC8687667 · DOI
- [13]Sheikh A, Kerr S, Woolhouse M,. Severity of Omicron variant of concern and vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease: national cohort with nested test negative design study in Scotland. Edinburgh Research Explorer. Preprint posted online 2021. https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/245818096/Severity_of_Omicron_variant_of_concern_and_vaccine_effectiveness_against_symptomatic_disease.pdf
- [31]Garcia-Beltran WF, St. Denis KJ, Hoelzemer A,. mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine boosters induce neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. medRxiv. Preprint posted online December 14, 2021. doi: 10.1101/2021.12.14.21267755 PMC8733787 34995482 · DOI
- [32]Pfizer. Pfizer and BioNTech provide update on Omicron variant. December 8, 2021. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-provide-update-omicron-variant
- [34]Redd AD, Nardin A, Kared H,. Minimal cross-over between mutations associated with Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 and CD8+ T cell epitopes identified in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. bioRxiv. Preprint posted online December 9, 2021. doi: 10.1101/2021.12.06.471446 PMC8941890 35229637 · DOI
- Authors
- Buchan, S. A., Chung, H., Brown, K. A., Austin, P. C., Fell, D. B., Gubbay, J. B., Nasreen, S., Schwartz, K. L., Sundaram, M. E., Tadrous, M., Wilson, K., Wilson, S. E., & Kwong, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kwong, Jeffrey C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2022-09-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e2232760
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9500552
- OpenAlex
- W4296686923
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 121
- FWCI
- 41.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Federal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- SUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
- Cancer Care Ontario
- Public Health Agency of Canada (CNF 151944, 151944)
- Public Health Agency
- University of Toronto
- Canadian Immunization Research Network (CNF 151944)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (151944, COVID-19, 151944_1)
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Keywords
- COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine effectiveness, Omicron variant, Delta variant, SARS-CoV-2, symptomatic infection, hospitalization, COVID-19 mortality, booster vaccination, test-negative case-control, Ontario, COVID-19 vaccination policy, vaccine hesitancy, health system capacity
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Adult, Hepatitis D, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Ontario, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review