Cited by 24Medical Coding and Health InformationHealth disparities and outcomesHealthcare Policy and Management

Assessment of Use of ICD-9 and ICD-10 Codes for Social Determinants of Health in the US, 2011-2021

Open access
Agarwal, Amil R., Prichett, Laura, Jain, Amit, Srikumaran, Uma·2023·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines trends in the use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for social determinants of health in the US from 2011 to 2021.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12538

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agarwal et al. documented a prevalence of Z code use of 7%.

    “Agarwal et al. documented a higher prevalence of Z codes use (7% vs. <4% in our paper)31.”

    From Documentation of individual-level social determinants of health among adults diagnosed with cancer in the United States (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results report that 6.8% of patients had at least one adverse SDOH code in 2021, which rounds to 7%. But this is a 2021 rate for the study’s SDOH codes, not a reported 7% prevalence of Z-code use across the full study period; the Results give 5.6% for 2011–2021 overall. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Hood CM, Gennuso KP, Swain GR, Catlin BB. County health rankings: relationships between determinant factors and health outcomes. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 50(2): 129- 135. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.024 26526164 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20): 2191- 2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 24141714 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Neiman PU, Tsai TC, Bergmark RW, Ibrahim A, Nathan H, Scott JW. The Affordable Care Act at 10 years: evaluating the evidence and navigating an uncertain future. J Surg Res. 2021; 263: 102- 109. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.056 33640844 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, A. R., Prichett, L., Jain, A., & Srikumaran, U.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Agarwal, Amil R.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2023-05-09
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
e2312538
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4375955751
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
ICD-9 codes, ICD-10 codes, social determinants of health, disease classification codes
MeSH terms
Humans, International Classification of Diseases, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review