First-Generation and Low-Income Students in the National Medical Student Body
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Diverse representation within the US medical student body and physician workforce is an important step to help address known pervasive health care disparities. Objective: To evaluate US medical school first-year matriculants between 2002 and 2015 through a disaggregated lens, parsing out low-income and first-generation students and understanding their intersectionality with racial and ethnic groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using deidentified student-level data of allopathic US medical school matriculants from the Association of American Medical Colleges Matriculating Student Questionnaire from 2002 through 2015, this cross-sectional study obtained demographic data with a focus on first-generation and low-income status. Data were analyzed from January 2022 through July 2024. Exposures: Race and ethnicity, first-generation medical student status, underrepresented in medicine (URIM) status (ie, identifying as Hispanic only, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander only, or non-Hispanic Black/African American only), parental income, total student debt, and graduation status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trends of first-generation and low-income students were evaluated longitudinally. Medical student parental income was compared with that of the US general population by race and ethnicity and generation status for the years 2002, 2008, and 2015. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to evaluate URIM, parental income, first-generation status, and attrition from medical school. Results: Between 2002 and 2015, a total of 256 513 students were included in this analysis (48.0% women; 14.7% URIM; 7.4% first-generation). The proportion of first-generation students decreased from 8.7% in 2002 to 7.1% in 2015. When comparing student parental income with that of the general population for 2002, 2008, and 2015, the top 5% of households by income were overrepresented among non–first-generation medical students (21.1% in 2002, 31.5% in 2008, and 26.4% in 2015), while the parental income representation of first-generation students was more aligned with the general population (1.4% in 2002, 2.8% in 2008, and 0.8% in 2015). The graduation rate of first-generation students was 2.1% lower than the graduation rate of non–first-generation students. Medical students were more likely to not graduate if they were low-income (odds ratio [OR], 1.71 [95% CI, 1.60-1.84]), URIM (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.98-2.17]), or first-generation (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.47-1.67]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of US medical student matriculants found a decrease in the number of matriculants who were first-generation. These students were at significant risk of attrition from medical school, particularly when considering the intersectionality with low-income and URIM identities. These results suggest a need to recruit and retain these students, so that the physician workforce better reflects the backgrounds and experiences of the communities served.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More recent work has shown declining representation of first-generation and low-income students within the national medical student body.
“More recent work has likewise shown declining representation of first-generation and low-income students within the national medical student body [2].”
From The Clinical Mentorship Program: a mixed-methods evaluation of a community-based medical education pathway program for high school students (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
The Results report that the proportion of first-generation medical students fell from 8.7% in 2002 to 7.1% in 2015. The paper does not report a corresponding decline in low-income students overall; the Discussion instead says the proportion of first-generation students in the lowest parental-income quintile increased. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- [1]Kamran SC, Winkfield KM, Reede JY, Vapiwala N. Intersectional analysis of U.S. medical faculty diversity over four decades. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(14): 1363- 1371. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2114909 35388674 · DOI
- [2]Morris DB, Gruppuso PA, McGee HA, Murillo AL, Grover A, Adashi EY. Diversity of the national medical student body—four decades of inequities. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(17): 1661- 1668. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2028487 33913645 · DOI
- [3]Williams WW. Medical school admissions—a movable barrier to ending health care disparities? N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(17): 1659- 1660. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2102832 33913644 · DOI
- [5]Salinas KE, Nguyen HB, Kamran SC. The invisible minority: a call to address the persistent socioeconomic diversity gap in U.S. medical schools and the physician workforce. Front Public Health. 2022; 10: 924746. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924746 35968485 PMC9372571 · DOI
- [6]Youngclaus JRL. An updated look at the economic diversity of US medical students. Association of American Medical Colleges Analysis in Brief. 2018; 18(5): 1- 3. https://www.aamc.org/media/9596/download
- [14]Raffoul M, Bartlett-Esquilant G, Phillips RL Jr. Recruiting and training a health professions workforce to meet the needs of tomorrow’s health care system. Acad Med. 2019; 94(5): 651- 655. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002606 30681446 · DOI
- [16]Cha J, Nguyen HB, Salinas KE, Kamran SC. See, seek, support: a policy framework to uplift first-generation low-income medical professionals. J Public Health Policy. 2023; 44(4): 685- 694. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00445-2 37884675 · DOI
- [19]Mason HRC, Ata A, Nguyen M,. First-generation and continuing-generation college graduates’ application, acceptance, and matriculation to U.S. medical schools: a national cohort study. Med Educ Online. 2022; 27(1): 2010291. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2010291 34898403 PMC8676688 · DOI
- [20]Shahriar AA, Puram VV, Miller JM,. Socioeconomic diversity of the matriculating US medical student body by race, ethnicity, and sex, 2017-2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(3): e222621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2621 35289863 PMC8924719 · DOI · Paper page
- [21]Nguyen M, Desai MM, Fancher TL, Chaudhry SI, Mason HRC, Boatright D. Temporal trends in childhood household income among applicants and matriculants to medical school and the likelihood of acceptance by income, 2014-2019. JAMA. 2023; 329(21): 1882- 1884. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.5654 37166785 PMC10176183 · DOI
- [22]Williams DKA, Christophers B, Keyes T,. Sociodemographic factors and research experience impact MD-PhD program acceptance. JCI Insight. 2024; 9(3): e176146. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.176146 38329127 PMC10967469 · DOI
- [23]Casola AR, Kunes B, Burns R, Kelly EL, de la Cruz MS. Demographic characteristics and career plans of first-generation medical students at a single medical school in the United States. PRiMER. 2023; 7: 29. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2023.471624 37791045 PMC10544633 · DOI
- [24]Christophers B, Macedo B, Nieblas-Bedolla E, Marr M, Andersen OS, Boothroyd C. First-generation physician-scientists are under-represented and need better support. Nat Med. 2021; 27(5): 752- 755. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01352-3 33958798 PMC8211032 · DOI
- [25]Kamran SC, Niemierko A, Deville C Jr, Vapiwala N. Diversity trends by sex and underrepresented in medicine status among US radiation and medical oncology faculty over 5 decades. JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8(2): 221- 229. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6011 34882189 PMC8662536 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hunt, V. M., Cheng, J., de Lomba, W. C., & Warrier, S. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09852-x
- Authors
- Kamran, S. C., Pompa, I. R., Nguyen, H. B., Cha, J., Salinas, K. E., Niemierko, A., & Vapiwala, N.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- John Peter Smith Hospital (US)
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kamran, Sophia C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2025-05-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e259769
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12070234
- OpenAlex
- W4410301366
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- underrepresented in medicine, parental income, student debt, racial and ethnic disparities, health care disparities, medical workforce diversity, intersectionality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Poverty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, United States, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review