Phosphorylated Tau as a Candidate Biomarker for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: An increasingly varied clinical spectrum of cases with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been identified, and objective criteria for clinical trial eligibility are necessary. OBJECTIVE: To develop a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of ALS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A case-control study including 51 individuals with ALS and 23 individuals with a disorder associated with a 4-repeat tauopathy was conducted at an academic medical center. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The CSF level of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (ptau) and ratio of ptau to total tau (ttau). RESULTS: Using a cross-validation prediction procedure, we found significantly reduced CSF levels of ptau and the ptau:ttau ratio in ALS relative to 4-repeat tauopathy and to controls. In the validation cohort, the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for the ptau:ttau ratio was 0.916, and the comparison of ALS with 4-repeat tauopathy showed 92.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity. Correct classification based on a low CSF ptau:ttau ratio was confirmed in 18 of 21 cases (86%) with autopsy-proved or genetically determined disease. In patients with available measures, ptau:ttau in ALS correlated with clinical measures of disease severity, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (n = 51) and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (n = 42), and regression analyses related the ptau:ttau ratio to magnetic resonance imaging (n = 10) evidence of disease in the corticospinal tract and white matter projections involving the prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CSF ptau:ttau ratio may be a candidate biomarker to provide objective support for the diagnosis of ALS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both t-tau and NfL may be useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of FTLD.
“The combination of CSF t-tau and NfL discriminated between early onset AD and FTLD, 9 and both analytes may be useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of FTLD.1,[10][11][12]”
From Plasma Tau and Neurofilament Light in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Alzheimer Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
The Results (page unavailable) report that CSF t-tau distinguished ALS from a four-repeat-tau comparison group, which offers limited support for diagnostic usefulness within the FTLD spectrum. The paper does not evaluate NfL, and its Results state that CSF levels were not related to progression rate; it therefore does not support the claim that both analytes may aid FTLD diagnosis and prognosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Grossman, M., Elman, L., McCluskey, L., McMillan, C. T., Boller, A., Powers, J., Rascovsky, K., Hu, W., Shaw, L., Irwin, D. J., Lee, V. M.-Y., & Trojanowski, J. Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grossman, Murray
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-04-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 442
- ISSN
- 2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3989393
- OpenAlex
- W2160809902
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG038490, P01AG017586, AG038490, K23AG042856, AG032953, K01AG043503, AG-017586, AG043503, P01AG032953)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS044266, R01NS044266)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, tau phosphorylation, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, ALS diagnosis, inclusion and exclusion criteria, disease severity, corticospinal tract
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phosphorylation, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, tau Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review