Plasma Tau and Neurofilament Light in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Alzheimer Disease
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that plasma total tau (t-tau) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations may have a differential role in the study of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes (FTLD-S) and clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease syndromes (AD-S), we determined their diagnostic and prognostic value in FTLD-S and AD-S and their sensitivity to pathologic diagnoses. METHODS: We measured plasma t-tau and NfL with the Simoa platform in 265 participants: 167 FTLD-S, 43 AD-S, and 55 healthy controls (HC), including 82 pathology-proven cases (50 FTLD-tau, 18 FTLD-TDP, 2 FTLD-FUS, and 12 AD) and 98 participants with amyloid PET. We compared cross-sectional and longitudinal biomarker concentrations between groups, their correlation with clinical measures of disease severity, progression, and survival, and cortical thickness. RESULTS: Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, discriminated FTLD-S from HC and AD-S from HC. Both plasma NfL and t-tau were poor discriminators between FLTD-S and AD-S. In pathology-confirmed cases, plasma NfL was higher in FTLD than AD and in FTLD-TDP compared to FTLD-tau, after accounting for age and disease severity. Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, predicted clinical decline and survival and correlated with regional cortical thickness in both FTLD-S and AD-S. The combination of plasma NfL with plasma t-tau did not outperform plasma NfL alone. CONCLUSION: Plasma NfL is superior to plasma t-tau for the diagnosis and prediction of clinical progression of FTLD-S and AD-S. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that plasma NfL has superior diagnostic and prognostic performance vs plasma t-tau in FTLD and AD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
36 of 43 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Research on plasma total tau in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, including this study, has not shown a link between plasma and CSF total tau.
“Studies of plasma t-tau in AD and FTLD, including the present one, have found no relationship between plasma and CSF t-tau.13”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Janelidze S, et al. Plasma tau in Alzheimer disease. Neu- rology 2016;87:1827-1835. source
The Results report no significant overall correlation in ADNI, but they also report a significant correlation between plasma tau and CSF total tau in BioFINDER, including an association in the AD dementia subgroup. Thus, this study does not support the blanket claim that no relationship was found. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 separates autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer disease from frontotemporal lobar degeneration better than clinical or amyloid PET-based classification.
“We also recently observed that phosphorylated plasma tau at threonine 181 differentiates autopsy-diagnosed AD from FTLD with better accuracy than clinically diagnosed or amyloid PET-defined cases.22”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) investigators, Thijssen EH, La Joie R, Wolf A, et al. Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar de- generation. Nat Med 2020;26:387-397. source
The Discussion (page not supplied) says the opposite of the claimed comparison: plasma pTau181 differentiated autopsy-diagnosed AD from FTLD with slightly lower accuracy than in clinically diagnosed or PET-defined cases. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Blood t-tau has no diagnostic potential for AD.
“Whereas blood t-tau shows no diagnostic potential for AD, 13 NfL in blood shows a clear increase in AD, 4 and also tracks neurofibrillary tangle load and cognitive decline.14,15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Janelidze S, et al. Plasma tau in Alzheimer disease. Neu- rology 2016;87:1827-1835. source
The Abstract Conclusions and Discussion say that plasma tau alone is insufficient as an AD biomarker for individual people, supporting the claim about its current diagnostic use. But “no diagnostic potential” is too absolute: the paper reports group-level differences, says plasma tau partly reflects AD pathology, and proposes further study of its biomarker use. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Only one earlier study examined plasma total tau levels in frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes.
“Only a single previous study, however, investigated plasma t-tau levels in FTLD-S.38”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] 38. Foiani MS, Woollacott IO, Heller C, et al. Plasma tau is increased in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89:804-807. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mass-spectrometry-measured plasma β-amyloid 42/40 tracks strongly with amyloid status on amyloid PET.
“Specifically, plasma β-amyloid 42/ 40 measured with mass spectrometry is strongly associated with amyloid status determined with amyloid PET scan.43”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] 43. Schindler SE, Bollinger JG, Ovod V, et al. High-precision plasma β-amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis. Neurology 2019;93:e1647-e1659. source
- Interpretationcitation
Plasma neurofilament light reflects brain pathophysiology.
“This further supports that plasma NfL reflects brain pathophysiology, 14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] 14. Ashton NJ, Leuzy A, Lim YM, et al. Increased plasma neurofilament light chain concentration correlates with severity of post-mortem neurofibrillary tangle pathol- ogy and neurodegeneration. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019;7:5. source
- Findingcitation
Plasma and CSF neurofilament light are highly correlated.
“Our results are also consistent with earlier reports showing a high correlation between plasma and CSF NfL. 5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Rojas JC, Karydas A, Bang J, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain predicts pro- gression in progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016;3:216-225. source
- Findingown data
Plasma t-tau had no diagnostic utility for separating AD-S from healthy controls (AUC 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.68, p = 0.333).
“Plasma t-tau had no diagnostic utility to differentiate between FTLD-S and AD-S (AUC 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.68,p = 0.085), FTLD-S and healthy controls (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.63,p = 0.414), or AD-S and healthy controls (AUC 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.68,p = 0.333).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma NfL performed poorly at discriminating FTLD-S from AD-S (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.82, p < 0.001).
“but a poor performance for the discrimination between FTLD-S and AD-S (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.82,p < 0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Both plasma NfL and t-tau were poor discriminators between FLTD-S and AD-S.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Plasma NfL distinguished AD-S from healthy controls with excellent performance (AUC 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, p < 0.001).
“of AD-S from controls (AUC 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98,p < 0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, discriminated FTLD-S from HC and AD-S from HC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Plasma t-tau had no diagnostic utility for separating FTLD-S from AD-S (AUC 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.68, p = 0.085).
“Plasma t-tau had no diagnostic utility to differentiate between FTLD-S and AD-S (AUC 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.68,p = 0.085), FTLD-S and healthy controls (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.63,p = 0.414), or AD-S and healthy controls (AUC 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.68,p = 0.333).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma t-tau had no diagnostic utility for separating FTLD-S from healthy controls (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.63, p = 0.414).
“Plasma t-tau had no diagnostic utility to differentiate between FTLD-S and AD-S (AUC 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.68,p = 0.085), FTLD-S and healthy controls (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.63,p = 0.414), or AD-S and healthy controls (AUC 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.68,p = 0.333).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma NfL distinguished FTLD-S from healthy controls with excellent performance (AUC 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, p < 0.001).
“Plasma NfL showed an excellent performance in the differentiation of FTLD-S from HC (AUC 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99,p < 0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, discriminated FTLD-S from HC and AD-S from HC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Compared with healthy controls, the FTLD-S group showed decreases in cortical thickness in dorsolateral prefrontal, superior frontal, inferior frontal, temporal poles, and medial and lateral temporal regions.
“When compared to the HC group, the FTLD-S group showed expected decreases in cortical thickness in dorsolateral prefrontal, superior frontal, inferior frontal, temporal poles, and medial and lateral temporal regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When analyses were restricted to each clinical group, only CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB correlated with plasma NfL in AD-S.
“When we restricted the analyses to each clinical group, however, only CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB correlated with plasma NfL in AD-S (r = 0.52, p = 0.003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within FTLD-S, the ALS-FTD subgroup had low plasma t-tau and high plasma NfL concentrations compared with other clinical phenotypes.
“within the FTLD-S group, the ALS-FTD subgroup showed low plasma t-tau (1.6 ± 0.9 pg/mL) and high plasma NfL concentrations (99.1 ± 46 pg/mL), compared to other clinical phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All FTLD-S subgroups had higher plasma NfL concentrations than AD-S.
“All the FTLD-S subgroups had higher plasma NfL concentrations than AD-S.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In pathology-confirmed cases, plasma NfL was higher in FTLD-TDP than in FTLD-tau after accounting for age and disease severity.
“Plasma NfL concentrations were higher in the FTLD-TDP subgroup (85.6 ± 46 pg/mL) compared to the FTLD-tau subgroup (50.4 ± 26 pg/mL; p = 0.001).”
- Also stated in: § Plasma t-Tau and NfL in Pathologically Confirmed FTLD · plain
“The effect size of this difference was small but remained significant after accounting for age, sex, and disease severity at plasma sampling (p < 0.001; partial η 2 = 0.20)”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“In pathologyconfirmed cases, plasma NfL was higher in FTLD than AD and in FTLD-TDP compared to FTLD-tau, after accounting for age and disease severity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Plasma t-Tau and NfL in Pathologically Confirmed FTLD · plain
- Findingown data
Plasma NfL concentrations were higher in FTLD-S than in AD-S and healthy controls.
“Plasma NfL concentrations in FTLD-S (50.2 ± 31 pg/mL) were higher than in AD-S and HC (28.5 ± 11 pg/ mL and 12.1 ± 4 pg/mL, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Plasma NfL was higher in both FTLD-S and AD-S than HC, and it was higher in FTLD-S compared to AD-S.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Plasma t-tau concentrations did not differ between FTLD subtypes.
“Plasma t-tau concentrations did not differ between FTLD subtypes (figure 1E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, predicted survival in FTLD-S after accounting for age, disease severity, sex, and clinical phenotype.
“only in FTLD-S, plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, predicted survival after accounting for age at plasma sampling, CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB, sex, and clinical phenotype.”
- Also stated in: § Survival Analyses · plain
“FTLD-S participants with high NfL concentrations (≥42 pg/mL) showed increased mortality compared to those with low concentrations (<42 pg/mL, log-rank 14.4, p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Survival Analyses · plain
- Findingown data
The AD-S group showed atrophy in temporal and parietal regions.
“The AD-S group also showed the expected pattern of atrophy in temporal and parietal regions (figure 4, A and B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Baseline plasma NfL concentrations related to faster annual worsening in both FTLD-S and AD-S.
“In contrast, baseline plasma NfL concentrations related to faster annual worsening in both FTLD-S (2.4 point change per log NfL ng/mL increase per year, 95% CI 0.78-2.4,p < 0.001) and AD-S (4.6 points change per log NfL ng/mL increase per year, 95% CI 1.2-5.5, p = 0.002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma t-tau concentrations did not differ between mutation carriers and sporadic FTLD-S.
“Plasma t-tau concentrations, however, did not differ between mutation carriers and sporadic FTLD-S.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma t-tau concentrations did not correlate with cortical thickness in either FTLD-S or AD-S groups.
“Plasma t-tau concentrations did not correlate with cortical thickness in either the FTLD-S or AD-S groups (figure 4, C and D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma NfL concentrations were higher in AD-S than in healthy controls.
“Plasma NfL concentrations were also higher in AD-S than HC (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combining plasma NfL with plasma t-tau did not improve performance over plasma NfL alone.
“The combination of plasma NfL with plasma t-tau did not outperform plasma NfL alone.”
- Also stated in: § Relationship Between Baseline Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Progression · plain
“The combination of plasma NfL and tau levels did not improve the ability of plasma NfL alone to predict longitudinal CDR+-NACC/FTLD-SB score changes.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“the combination of plasma NfL and plasma t-tau did not improve the performance of plasma NfL alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Relationship Between Baseline Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Progression · plain
- Findingown data
Age at plasma sampling did not correlate with plasma t-tau concentrations in any clinical group.
“Age at plasma sampling did not correlate with plasma t-tau concentrations in any clinical group (r = 0.13, p = 0.08; r = 0.11, p = 0.44; and r = -0.05,p = 0.67 for FTLD-S, AD-S, and HC, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, correlated with regional cortical thickness in both FTLD-S and AD-S.
“Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, predicted clinical decline and survival and correlated with regional cortical thickness in both FTLD-S and AD-S.”
- Also stated in: § Relationship Between Plasma Biomarkers and Cortical Thickness · boosted
“In contrast, plasma NfL showed strong correlations with cortical thickness in frontal regions in FTLD-S and the right lateral temporal lobe, right inferior parietal, and left superior frontal in the AD-S group (figure 4, E and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Relationship Between Plasma Biomarkers and Cortical Thickness · boosted
- Findingown data
Plasma and CSF t-tau did not correlate in the general sample or in any clinical group.
“Plasma and CSF t-tau did not correlate with each other in the general sample or in any clinical group (general sample r = 0.01, p = 0.19; FTLD-S r = 0.09, p = 0.34; AD-S r = -0.17,p = 0.41; and HC r = -0.14, p = 0.36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma NfL and CSF NfL concentrations were strongly correlated in all clinical groups.
“Conversely, plasma NfL and CSF NfL concentrations were strongly correlated in all clinical groups (r = 0.82, r = 0.63, r = 0.64, and r = 0.66, in the general sample, FTLD-S, AD-S, and HC, respectively, all p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In pathology-confirmed cases, plasma NfL was higher in FTLD than in AD.
“In pathologyconfirmed cases, plasma NfL was higher in FTLD than AD and in FTLD-TDP compared to FTLD-tau, after accounting for age and disease severity.”
- Also stated in: § Plasma t-Tau and NfL in Pathologically Confirmed FTLD · plain
“both FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP pathologic groups had higher plasma NfL concentrations than the pathologically confirmed AD group or positive amyloid PET.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Plasma t-Tau and NfL in Pathologically Confirmed FTLD · plain
- Findingown data
There were no differences in plasma t-tau or NfL concentrations according to the presence or absence of AD pathophysiology.
“There were no differences in plasma t-tau or NfL concentrations regarding presence or absence of AD pathophysiology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
FTLD-S participants with high NfL concentrations (≥42 pg/mL) had increased mortality compared with those with low concentrations (<42 pg/mL).
“FTLD-S participants with high NfL concentrations (≥42 pg/mL) showed increased mortality compared to those with low concentrations (<42 pg/mL, log-rank 14.4, p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP pathologic groups had higher plasma NfL concentrations than pathologically confirmed AD or positive amyloid PET.
“both FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP pathologic groups had higher plasma NfL concentrations than the pathologically confirmed AD group or positive amyloid PET.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma neurofilament light varies widely, particularly in FTLD-TDP.
“the variability of plasma NfL is high, especially in FTLD-TDP”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The analyses of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathologic subtypes assume that the 70 cases with available pathologic data are representative of the entire frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndrome cohort.
- Findingown data
Plasma neurofilament light was higher in FTLD-TDP than in FTLD-tau or AD.
“Plasma NfL was higher in FTLD-TDP than FTLD-tau or AD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The analyses of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathologic subtypes assume that the 70 cases with available pathologic data are representative of the entire frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndrome cohort.
- Findingown data
Plasma NfL was not associated with survival in AD-S.
“Plasma NfL | 1.95 (1.25-3.04) | 0.003 a,d | 0.78 (0.06-9.30) | 0.840”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Plasma and serum neurofilament light are higher in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer disease than in healthy controls.
“Our results add to a large body of evidence showing that plasma or serum NfL concentrations are elevated in both FTLD and AD, compared to healthy individuals, 6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] 6. Bridel C, van Wieringen WN, Zetterberg H, et al. Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light protein in neurology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:1035. source
- Findingown data
Plasma total tau predicted decline only in certain FTLD-S subgroups (bvFTD and PSP), not across all FTLD-S or AD-S cases.
“In sharp contrast, plasma levels of t-tau only predicted clinical decline in some clinical subgroups of FTLD-S (bvFTD and PSP) but not in the whole FTLD-S and AD-S groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plasma neurofilament light is a poor discriminator of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology subtypes.
“which makes it a poor discriminator of FTLD pathology subtypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The analyses of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathologic subtypes assume that the 70 cases with available pathologic data are representative of the entire frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndrome cohort.
- Findingown data
In FTLD-S, plasma NfL was associated with survival (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.25-3.04, p=0.003).
“Plasma NfL | 1.95 (1.25-3.04) | 0.003 a,d”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In FTLD-S, adding plasma NfL improved a model with age, sex, CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB, and phenotype.
“In the FTLD-S group, the addition of plasma NfL improved the model containing age, sex, CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB, and phenotype (χ 2 = 8.796, p = 0.003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
This study provides Class III evidence that plasma NfL has superior diagnostic and prognostic performance compared with plasma t-tau in FTLD and AD.
“This study provides Class III evidence that plasma NfL has superior diagnostic and prognostic performance vs plasma t-tau in FTLD and AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Plasma total tau performs much worse clinically than other plasma Alzheimer disease biomarkers.
“The clinical performance of plasma t-tau is in marked contrast with that of other AD biomarkers in plasma.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This result argues against total tau being a general neurodegeneration marker.
“This finding does not support the role of t-tau as a general marker of neurodegeneration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This study indicates plasma NfL is superior to plasma t-tau as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in both FTLD-S and AD-S.
“This study supports the superiority of plasma NfL compared with plasma t-tau as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for both FTLD-S and AD-S.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
No replication cohort confirmed the findings.
“The results were not confirmed in a replication cohort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Overall, the evidence indicates poor performance for plasma total tau, likely limiting its single-subject usefulness.
“Together, the data support that plasma t-tau has a poor performance and will likely be of little value at a single subject level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This elevation was driven by high levels in ALS-FTD patients.
“a result driven by high plasma NfL concentrations in patients with ALS-FTD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The analyses of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathologic subtypes assume that the 70 cases with available pathologic data are representative of the entire frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndrome cohort.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
- May combine two claims. 40
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTotal tau is increased in pathology-confirmed AD and is considered a neurodegeneration biomarker in current research AD frameworks.
“Total tau (t-tau) is increased in pathology-confirmed AD and is considered a neurodegeneration biomarker in current research AD frameworks.3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018;14:535-562. source
Section 9.4 places CSF total tau in the framework’s (N) neurodegeneration or neuronal-injury biomarker group. Section 9.3 discusses total tau in AD patients, but does not establish that it is increased specifically in pathology-confirmed AD; its reference to postmortem pathology concerns phosphorylated tau. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationElevated CSF total tau and phosphorylated tau are regarded as markers of neurodegeneration and tau pathology in Alzheimer disease and are used clinically to raise diagnostic certainty; with CSF Aβ42 they are recommended in the Alzheimer's Association Appropriate Use Criteria for CSF testing in AD diagnosis.
“Elevated CSF levels of t-tau and p-tau are considered markers of neurodegeneration and tau pathology in AD and are used in the clinical setting to increase the diagnostic certainty of AD, 1 and together with CSF Aβ42 recommended for diagnostic use in the Alzheimer's Association Appropriate Use Criteria for CSF testing in the diagnosis of AD. 35”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Lleo A, Irwin DJ, Illan-Gala I, et al. A 2-step cerebrospinal algorithm for the selection of frontotemporal lobar degeneration subtypes. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:738-745. source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] 35. Shaw LM, Arias J, Blennow K, et al. Appropriate use criteria for lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid testing in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018;14:1505-1521. source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable, 1 not checked. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn that earlier study, plasma total tau was elevated in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, and symptomatic MAPT mutation carriers.
“In that study, plasma t-tau was elevated in bvFTD, PPA, and symptomatic MAPT mutation carriers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] 38. Foiani MS, Woollacott IO, Heller C, et al. Plasma tau is increased in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89:804-807. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CSF total tau immunoassay used here employs monoclonal antibodies with epitopes in the mid-protein region, while the plasma total tau assay detects epitopes from the N-terminal region to amino acid 224.
“For example, the CSF t-tau immunoassay used here relies on a combination of monoclonal antibodies with epitopes in the mid-protein region.In contrast, the plasma t-tau assay detects epitopes going from the N-terminal region to the more distal amino acid 224.39”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. Cicognola C, Brinkmalm G, Wahlgren J, et al. Novel tau fragments in cerebrospinal fluid: relation to tangle pathology and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol 2019;137:279-296. source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says standard CSF t-tau immunoassays use monoclonal antibodies with mid-region epitopes. But the Materials and methods section describes the assay detecting fragments ending at amino acid 224 as a CSF assay using neat CSF samples, not a plasma t-tau assay; it also describes those fragments as N-terminally truncated. The plasma-assay portion is therefore unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationPET scans were read as positive or negative using a method previously described and validated against neuropathology.
“PET scans were read as positive or negative, as previously described and validated against neuropathology.27”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] 27. La Joie R, Ayakta N, Seeley WW, et al. Multisite study of the relationships between antemortem [ 11 C]PIB-PET Centiloid values and postmortem measures of Alz- heimer's disease neuropathology. Alzheimers Dement 2019;15:205-216. source
The Results (Complementary analyses; page unavailable) describe clinicians reading PET scans as positive or negative. The Discussion (Pathology-based thresholds; page unavailable) validates a quantitative Centiloid threshold against neuropathology and compares it with visual reads, but does not establish that the visual-reading method itself was validated against neuropathology. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTau hyperphosphorylation produces paired helical filaments that aggregate into neurofibrillary tangles, which are a defining pathologic feature of Alzheimer disease.
“Tau hyperphosphorylation leads to the formation of paired helical filaments that aggregate in neurofibrillary tangles, a defining pathologic hallmark of AD. 3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018;14:535-562. source
Section 6 (Definition of AD; page unavailable) says paired helical filament (PHF) tau deposits are required, along with Aβ deposits, to meet neuropathologic criteria for AD. Section 9.2 (Tau PET; page unavailable) refers to PHF tangles, while section 9.3 (CSF T-tau and P-tau; page unavailable) associates phosphorylated tau with PHF formation. The paper does not state the claimed causal sequence that tau hyperphosphorylation produces filaments that then aggregate into tangles. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitationt-tau and NfL reflect different aspects of neurodegeneration and provide different information from other neurodegeneration biomarkers such as FDG-PET or structural neuroimaging, and their longitudinal trajectories may be differently affected by demographic variables or disease stage.
“This adds to accumulating evidence supporting that t-tau and NfL reflect different aspects of neurodegeneration and provide different information compared to other neurodegeneration biomarkers, such as FDG-PET, or structural neuroimaging biomarkers, and that their longitudinal trajectories may be differently affected by demographic variables or disease stage.34”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] 34. Illan-Gala I, Pegueroles J, Montal V, et al. Challenges associated with biomarker-based classification systems for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement Amst Neth 2018; 10:346-357. source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationPlasma NfL and t-tau concentrations were measured by board-certified laboratory technicians blinded to clinical data.
“Plasma NfL and plasma t-tau concentrations were determined with commercially available ultrasensitive Single molecule array technology using an HD-1 analyzer (Quanterix, Billerica, MA), by board-certified laboratory technicians blinded to clinical data, as previously described.5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Rojas JC, Karydas A, Bang J, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain predicts pro- gression in progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016;3:216-225. source
The Subjects and Methods section (Plasma and CSF analyses; page unavailable) says a board-certified laboratory technician measured plasma NfL using an assay transferred onto the Simoa platform. It does not say the technician was blinded to clinical data, and the paper reports total tau measurements in CSF, not plasma. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigh CSF total tau is associated with clinical progression in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
“High CSF t-tau relates to clinical progression in AD 36 and FTLD.37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] 36. Wattmo C, Blennow K, Hansson O. Cerebro-spinal fluid biomarker levels: phos- phorylated tau (T) and total tau (N) as markers for rate of progression in Alzheimer's disease. BMC Neurol 2020;20:10. source
- cites [37] 37. Ljubenkov PA, Staffaroni AM, Rojas JC, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers predict frontotemporal dementia trajectory. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018;5:1250-1263. source
The Results section, “Baseline NfL and total tau predict change in nfvPPA” (page unavailable), reports that higher CSF total tau predicted faster clinical worsening in patients with nfvPPA, an FTD variant. This supports the FTLD-related point cited to this paper, but the finding is specific to nfvPPA rather than FTLD generally. The citing sentence assigns the Alzheimer disease point to a different citation, so it is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationConsistent with this study, plasma total tau was unrelated to baseline severity, brain volume, or AD pathophysiology indexed by the CSF tau/Aβ1-42 ratio.
“In agreement with our results, no associations were found between plasma t-tau and baseline measures of disease severity or brain volume and AD pathophysiology (as measured by the CSF tau/Aβ 1-42 ratio).38”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] 38. Foiani MS, Woollacott IO, Heller C, et al. Plasma tau is increased in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89:804-807. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPlasma NfL increases after neuronal injury and correlates with clinical progression and survival in FTLD-S and AD-S.
“Plasma NfL increases upon neuronal injury and correlates with clinical progression and survival in FTLD syndromes (FTLD-S) and AD syndromes (AD-S).[4][5][6][7][8]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] 4. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K; for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Association of plasma neurofilament light with neuro- degeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 2017;74:557. source
The Discussion (page unavailable) describes plasma NfL as a marker of neuronal injury and reports associations with cognitive and imaging decline in AD. It notes elevated levels in frontotemporal dementia, but does not establish a correlation with clinical progression in FTLD syndromes; neither the Discussion nor the Results addresses survival in either syndrome. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [5] 5. Rojas JC, Karydas A, Bang J, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain predicts pro- gression in progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016;3:216-225. source
The Discussion (page unavailable) describes blood NfL as a marker of neuronal injury, and the Results and Discussion link higher baseline plasma NfL to faster clinical decline in PSP. This copy does not establish a plasma NfL association with progression and survival across FTLD-S and AD-S; its survival-related finding concerns ALS patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] 6. Bridel C, van Wieringen WN, Zetterberg H, et al. Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light protein in neurology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:1035. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn two large Alzheimer disease cohorts, plasma total tau was associated with faster clinical decline.
“Also in agreement with the present results are those from 2 large AD cohorts, in which plasma t-tau was associated with faster clinical decline.13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Janelidze S, et al. Plasma tau in Alzheimer disease. Neu- rology 2016;87:1827-1835. source
The Results section reports that higher plasma tau was associated with accelerated cognitive decline in ADNI. The Methods section describes ADNI as prospectively followed but BioFINDER as cross-sectional, so the paper does not establish faster clinical decline in both cohorts. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNfL in blood shows a clear increase in AD and tracks neurofibrillary tangle load and cognitive decline.
“Whereas blood t-tau shows no diagnostic potential for AD, 13 NfL in blood shows a clear increase in AD, 4 and also tracks neurofibrillary tangle load and cognitive decline.14,15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] 4. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K; for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Association of plasma neurofilament light with neuro- degeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 2017;74:557. source
The Results section on diagnostic groups reports higher plasma NfL in AD dementia than in controls, and the Results section on cognition reports an association with faster cognitive decline. The paper does not measure neurofibrillary tangle load. Its biochemical-marker results show a weak correlation with CSF phosphorylated tau in the full cohort, which does not establish that NfL tracks tangle load. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [14] 14. Ashton NJ, Leuzy A, Lim YM, et al. Increased plasma neurofilament light chain concentration correlates with severity of post-mortem neurofibrillary tangle pathol- ogy and neurodegeneration. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019;7:5. source
- cites [15] 15. Mattsson N, Cullen NC, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Association be- tween longitudinal plasma neurofilament light and neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:791. source
The Abstract and Discussion report that changes in plasma NfL correlate with worsening cognition, and the Abstract reports associations with CSF tau biomarkers. The paper does not report measuring neurofibrillary tangle load, so the claim that NfL tracks tangle load is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, plasma and CSF total tau correlate strongly, and both the concentration range and species diversity in these fluids exceed those in Alzheimer disease or frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
“This contrasts with a strong correlation of plasma and CSF t-tau concentration in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, in which the range of t-tau concentrations and species in plasma and CSF is higher than in AD or FTLD.40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] 40. Staffaroni AM, Kramer AO, Casey M, et al. Association of blood and cerebrospinal fluid tau level and other biomarkers with survival time in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:969-977. source
The Baseline Characteristics section reports a strong correlation between plasma and CSF total tau in sporadic CJD (r = 0.74). The Discussion mentions greater serum tau elevations in CJD than in other neurodegenerative conditions, but it does not establish that concentration ranges in both fluids exceed those in AD or FTLD. Our copy does not compare tau species diversity across these diseases. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPlasma biomarkers are powerful diagnostic and prognostic clinical tools.
“Plasma biomarkers are powerful diagnostic and prognostic clinical tools. 1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Lleo A, Irwin DJ, Illan-Gala I, et al. A 2-step cerebrospinal algorithm for the selection of frontotemporal lobar degeneration subtypes. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:738-745. source
The Biofluid Collection and Analysis and Discussion sections describe cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and their diagnostic use in distinguishing neurodegenerative pathologies. The Discussion also notes that CSF neurofilament light correlates with disease progression, but the paper does not establish that plasma biomarkers are diagnostic or prognostic clinical tools. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPlasma total tau was slightly increased and tracked with greater longitudinal hypometabolism in Alzheimer disease patients versus controls.
“Plasma t-tau was weakly elevated and correlated with more severe longitudinal hypometabolism in patients with AD compared to controls.13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Janelidze S, et al. Plasma tau in Alzheimer disease. Neu- rology 2016;87:1827-1835. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThat earlier study had small effect sizes, lacked pathologic data, and did not test whether clinical scales, neuropsychological tests, or survival predicted progression.
“but the effect sizes were small, pathologic data were not available, and analyses for prediction of disease progression with clinical scales, neuropsychological testing, and survival were not conducted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] 38. Foiani MS, Woollacott IO, Heller C, et al. Plasma tau is increased in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89:804-807. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn acute conditions like traumatic brain injury and hypoxic brain injury, plasma total tau measured by the same assay increases quickly, with an apparent half-life near 10 hours, while CSF total tau has a half-life near 20 days.
“In acute conditions, like traumatic brain injury and hypoxic brain injury, plasma t-tau concentrations measured using the same technology as the one employed here increase rapidly and show an apparent half-life of around 10 hours, 41 which contrasts with the half-life of CSF t-tau, which is about 20 days.42”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Zetterberg H. Review: tau in biofluids: relation to pathology, imaging and clinical features. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2017;43:194-199. source
The Plasma tau section reports rapid increases after hypoxic brain injury and concussion, and says tau’s half-life appears to be measured in hours in plasma versus weeks in CSF. It does not give the specific estimates of approximately 10 hours and 20 days. The section identifies Simoa as a blood-tau measurement platform, but does not establish that it is the same assay used by the citing authors. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [42] 42. Sato C, Barthélemy NR, Mawuenyega KG, et al. Tau kinetics in neurons and the human central nervous system. Neuron 2018;98:861-864. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth t-tau and NfL may be useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of FTLD.
“The combination of CSF t-tau and NfL discriminated between early onset AD and FTLD, 9 and both analytes may be useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of FTLD.1,[10][11][12]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Lleo A, Irwin DJ, Illan-Gala I, et al. A 2-step cerebrospinal algorithm for the selection of frontotemporal lobar degeneration subtypes. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:738-745. source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says NfL is elevated in FTD and correlates with disease progression, supporting its potential prognostic use, but cautions that it lacks disease specificity. The paper uses t-tau among biomarkers that help exclude AD in FTLD-related syndromes; it does not establish t-tau as a prognostic marker for FTLD. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [10] 10. Irwin DJ, Lleo A, Xie SX, et al. Ante mortem cerebrospinal fluid tau levels correlate with postmortem tau pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Ann Neurol 2017;82:247-258. source
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports possible diagnostic utility for a CSF p-tau-to-t-tau ratio in distinguishing FTLD subtypes, which offers limited support for a role for t-tau. The Results and Discussion assess diagnostic accuracy for p-tau, not t-tau alone. Our copy does not establish diagnostic or prognostic utility for NfL, or prognostic utility for t-tau. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [11] 11. Grossman M, Elman L, McCluskey L, et al. Phosphorylated tau as a candidate bio- marker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:442-448. source
The Results (page unavailable) report that CSF t-tau distinguished ALS from a four-repeat-tau comparison group, which offers limited support for diagnostic usefulness within the FTLD spectrum. The paper does not evaluate NfL, and its Results state that CSF levels were not related to progression rate; it therefore does not support the claim that both analytes may aid FTLD diagnosis and prognosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPlasma total tau's weak performance may stem from assay limitations, while phosphorylated tau forms may have better clinical utility.
“These results may be related to limitations of the methodology to measure plasma t-tau, and the measurement of phosphorylated species of tau may have better clinical performance, as suggested by recent studies.44”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] 44. Blennow K, Chen C, Cicognola C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau fragment correlates with tau PET: a candidate biomarker for tangle pathology. Brain 2020;143:650-660. source
The Introduction and CSF collection and biomarker analyses sections discuss assays for cerebrospinal-fluid tau, not plasma tau. The Discussion compares CSF tau measures with tau PET, but does not say that limitations in measuring plasma total tau explain its performance or that plasma phosphorylated tau has better clinical performance. Searches for plasma assay limitations and plasma p-tau found no passage addressing those claims; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Alzheimer disease, elevated plasma neurofilament light tracks with quicker global cognitive decline and faster atrophy.
“This study also replicated the findings of previous investigations supporting that, in AD, high plasma NfL correlates with faster worsening in global cognition and faster atrophy rates.4,15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] 4. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K; for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Association of plasma neurofilament light with neuro- degeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 2017;74:557. source
- cites [15] 15. Mattsson N, Cullen NC, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Association be- tween longitudinal plasma neurofilament light and neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:791. source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost pathology-confirmed FTLD cases had at least some degree of AD co-pathology, but this did not influence the performance of plasma t-tau or NfL.
“Most pathology-confirmed FTLD cases had at least some degree of AD co-pathology, but this did not influence the performance of plasma t-tau or NfL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFTLD-S participants without a mutation had plasma NfL concentrations similar to GRN and MAPT mutation carriers but lower than C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers.
“participants in the FTLD-S group without a mutation had similar plasma NfL concentrations (46.1 ± 23 pg/mL) compared to GRN (88.1 ± 60 pg/mL, p = 0.43) and MAPT (30.1 ± 17 pg/mL, p = 0.89) mutation carriers, but lower than those with a C9orf72 repeat expansion (88.1 ± 57, p = 0.049).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the whole sample, plasma NfL correlated with MMSE, language and executive cognitive composites, and CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB scores.
“In the whole sample, plasma NfL correlated with MMSE (r = -0.26,p < 0.001), the language and executive cognitive composites (r = -0.22 and r = -0.22,respectively, all p < 0.001), and CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB (r = 0.41, p < 0.001) scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe relationship between baseline NfL and worse disease severity was significant in all FTLD-S subgroups except nfvPPA and CBS and in both typical amnestic and nonamnestic AD presentations.
“The relationship between baseline NfL and worse disease severity was significant in all FTLD-S subgroups (except for nfvPPA and CBS) and both typical amnestic and nonamnestic AD presentations (supplementary table e-4, 10.5061/dryad.12jm63xvv).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBaseline plasma t-tau concentrations were associated with worse decline in FTLD-S, but only in the bvFTD and PSP subgroups, and not in AD-S.
“In FTLD-S, baseline plasma t-tau concentrations were associated with worse decline (3.7 points change in CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB score per log t-tau pg/mL increase per year, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.0, p = 0.006).”
- Also stated in: § Relationship Between Baseline Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Progression · plain
“However, this effect was evident only in the bvFTD and PSP FTLD-S subgroups (3.6 points change in CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB, 95% CI 0. 1-7.1, p = 0.015 and 11.8 points change in CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB, 95% CI 0.3-23.3,p = 0.023) and was not observed in the AD-S group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Relationship Between Baseline Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Progression · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlasma NfL showed strong correlations with cortical thickness in frontal regions in FTLD-S and in right lateral temporal, right inferior parietal, and left superior frontal regions in AD-S.
“In contrast, plasma NfL showed strong correlations with cortical thickness in frontal regions in FTLD-S and the right lateral temporal lobe, right inferior parietal, and left superior frontal in the AD-S group (figure 4, E and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither plasma t-tau nor plasma NfL predicted survival in AD-S.
“Neither plasma t-tau nor plasma NfL predicted survival in the AD-S group (table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, predicted clinical decline in both FTLD-S and AD-S.
“Plasma NfL, but not plasma t-tau, predicted clinical decline and survival and correlated with regional cortical thickness in both FTLD-S and AD-S.”
- Also stated in: § Relationship Between Baseline Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Progression · plain
“baseline plasma NfL concentrations related to faster annual worsening in both FTLD-S (2.4 point change per log NfL ng/mL increase per year, 95% CI 0.78-2.4,p < 0.001) and AD-S (4.6 points change per log NfL ng/mL increase per year, 95% CI 1.2-5.5, p = 0.002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Relationship Between Baseline Plasma Biomarkers and Clinical Progression · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAge and plasma NfL were moderately correlated in AD-S and healthy controls but not in FTLD-S.
“In contrast, age and plasma NfL were moderately correlated in AD-S and HC (r = 0.51 and r = 0.63, respectively, all p < 0.001), but not in FTLD-S (r = 0.02, p = 0.79).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe final sample included 265 participants: 167 with FTLD-S, 43 with AD-S, and 55 healthy controls.
“The final sample included 265 participants: 167 FTLD-S (43 bvFTD, 28 nfvPPA, 18 svPPA, 36 PSP, 32 CBS, and 10 ALS-FTD), 43 AD-S, and 55 HC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn FTLD-S, only clinical phenotype was independently associated with shorter survival; in AD-S, only CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB was independently associated with shorter survival.
“As shown in table 2, in FTLD-S, only the clinical phenotype was independently associated with shorter survival, whereas in AD-S, only the CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB score was independently associated with shorter survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlasma total tau was not associated with survival in FTLD-S or AD-S.
“Plasma t-tau | 0.80 (0.40-1.60) | 0.514 | 0.98 (0.12-7.71) | 0.984”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlasma neurofilament light lacks specificity and discriminates poorly between frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer disease, or among frontotemporal lobar degeneration subtypes.
“but it is nonspecific and has weak discriminatory power between FTLD and AD or between FTLD clinical subtypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSurvival analyses controlled for age at diagnosis, sex, disease severity at symptom onset, and primary clinical phenotype in FTLD-S.
“We applied Cox regression analyses to estimate survival, controlling for age at diagnosis, sex, disease severity at symptom onset, and primary clinical phenotype (only in the FTLD-S group).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese differences may also explain the weak plasma-CSF total tau correlation and the poor diagnostic performance of plasma total tau in chronic neurodegeneration.
“This may also explain the weak correlation of plasma and CSF t-tau and the poor diagnostic performance of plasma t-tau in chronic neurodegeneration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe combination of CSF t-tau and NfL discriminated between early onset AD and FTLD.
“The combination of CSF t-tau and NfL discriminated between early onset AD and FTLD, 9 and both analytes may be useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of FTLD.1,[10][11][12]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] 9. Sjogren M, Rosengren L, Minthon L, Davidsson P, Blennow K, Wallin A. Cyto- skeleton proteins in CSF distinguish frontotemporal dementia from AD. Neurology 2000;54:1960-1964. source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAge at plasma sampling, education, MMSE, and CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB were similar in FTLD-S and AD-S, while the healthy control group was younger than both disease groups.
“Age at plasma sampling, education, MMSE, and CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB was similar in FTLD-S and AD-S.The HC group, however, was younger than both disease groups (table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTau is implicated in the pathophysiology of AD and FTLD and can be measured in plasma with ultrasensitive immunoassays.
“The microtubule-associated protein tau has been implicated in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and can be measured in plasma with ultrasensitive immunoassays.2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] 2. Randall J, Mörtberg E, Provuncher GK, et al. Tau proteins in serum predict neuro- logical outcome after hypoxic brain injury from cardiac arrest: results of a pilot study. Resuscitation 2013;84:351-356. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFluid biomarker concentrations were log-transformed using the natural log to satisfy the normal distribution assumption.
“Fluid biomarker concentrations were log-transformed using the natural log to fulfill the normal distribution assumption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll participants gave written informed consent.
“All participants gave their written informed consent to participate in the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPlasma NfL is superior to plasma t-tau for diagnosing and predicting clinical progression in FTLD-S and AD-S.
“Plasma NfL is superior to plasma t-tau for the diagnosis and prediction of clinical progression of FTLD-S and AD-S.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“The main findings of this study are that (1) only plasma NfL provided between-group clinical discrimination, predicted disease progression and survival, and correlated with neuroimage measures of neurodegeneration; and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was approved by the UCSF Institutional Review Board and conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki.
“The study was approved by the UCSF Institutional Review Board and was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFifteen MRIs were excluded from final neuroimaging analyses because of low image quality or because they were performed on a different scanner.
“Fifteen MRIs were excluded from final neuroimaging analyses: 8 because of low image quality (i.e., significant movement artifact) or preprocessing errors and 7 because they were performed in a different MRI scanner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningPartial correlations between neuropsychology testing variables and plasma biomarkers adjusted for age and education to account for their effect on cognitive performance.
“Then, we studied the correlation between neuropsychology testing variables and plasma biomarkers with partial correlations adjusting for age and education, to account for the well-known effect of these variables on cognitive performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of plasma-CSF total tau association may arise from compartment-specific tau species or from differing assay sensitivities.
“This may be related to differential expression of tau species in each compartment or different sensitivities of the techniques used for detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenClinical diagnosis was made by clinicians who were blinded to fluid biomarker results.
“Clinical diagnosis was made by clinicians blinded to fluid biomarker results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataLongitudinal changes in plasma biomarkers were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models controlling for age, sex, CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB, and time between samples.
“To study longitudinal changes in plasma biomarkers, we used linear mixed-effects models controlling for age, sex, CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB, and time between samples in the subset of participants with 2 plasma samples (n = 123, mean time between samples = 1.2 ± 0.4 years).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe proportionality-of-hazards assumption was checked and fulfilled.
“Of note, we checked that the assumption of proportionality of hazards was fulfilled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe FTLD-S cohort was sizable and had pathologic data for 70 cases, 42% of the sample.
“We studied a sizeable FTLD-S cohort with available pathologic data (i.e., 70 cases or 42% of the FTLD-S sample).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The analyses of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathologic subtypes assume that the 70 cases with available pathologic data are representative of the entire frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndrome cohort.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPlasma and CSF neurofilament light may yield similar prognostic information, with plasma offering greater clinical convenience.
“and that plasma and CSF NfL may provide equivalent prognostic information, with the added value of plasma being more convenient for clinical use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPlasma total tau may differ from other blood neurodegeneration biomarkers, a point relevant to refining biomarker-based classification.
“Plasma t-tau may not be equivalent to other blood-based neurodegeneration biomarkers, which should be considered for the refinement of biomarker-based classification schemes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationNeurofilament light is recognized as a nonspecific CSF and plasma marker of neuronal injury across degenerative and nondegenerative conditions.
“NfL has emerged as a nonspecific CSF and plasma biomarker of neuronal injury in degenerative and nondegenerative disorders.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] 6. Bridel C, van Wieringen WN, Zetterberg H, et al. Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light protein in neurology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:1035. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAD-S findings warrant caution given the group's small size and lack of preclinical AD cases.
“However, our results in the AD-S group should be interpreted cautiously due to its relatively small size and the lack of AD participants at the preclinical stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese findings align with a recent European multicenter study of plasma NfL in genetic FTLD.
“Our results, however, are in line with a recent European multicenter study of plasma NfL in genetic FTLD.50”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] 50. van der Ende EL, Meeter LH, Poos JM, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain in genetic frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:1103-1111. source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe cohort does not represent genetic FTLD, as it had few genetic cases and no prodromal forms.
“The study is not representative of genetic FTLD forms, because it included only a small number of participants with genetic FTLD and did not include prodromal forms of disease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Studies of plasma NfL and t-tau in pathology-confirmed FTLD and AD are scarce, and it is unknown whether their concentrations are affected by comorbid AD presenting in the context of primary FTLD pathology.
“Studies of plasma NfL and t-tau in pathology-confirmed FTLD and AD are scarce, and it is unknown if their concentrations are affected by comorbid AD presenting in the context of primary FTLD pathology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The analyses of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathologic subtypes assume that the 70 cases with available pathologic data are representative of the entire frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndrome cohort.
“We studied a sizeable FTLD-S cohort with available pathologic data (i.e., 70 cases or 42% of the FTLD-S sample).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CSF NfL is elevated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration, but its concentrations do not differentiate frontotemporal lobar degeneration from non-frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology, nor do they distinguish the different proteinopathies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
“NfL in CSF is elevated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration, but concentrations do not differentiate frontotemporal lobar degeneration from non-frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology, nor do they distinguish the different protein opathies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.47,49,50”
From Advances and controversies in frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, biomarkers, and therapeutic considerations (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPlasma NfL concentrations correlate well with CSF NfL concentrations.
“NfL concentrations in plasma correlate well with those in CSF.47,50”
From Advances and controversies in frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, biomarkers, and therapeutic considerations (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
High levels of NfL are not specific to bvFTD as this biomarker can be strongly elevated in several other neurodegenerative conditions.
“However, high levels of NfL are not specific to bvFTD as this biomarker can be strongly elevated in several other neurodegenerative conditions as well [2,40,41].”
Serum and plasma NfL are elevated in FTD compared to AD, but with limited utility in discriminating FTD from AD.
“Similar to what was observed in CSF, serum and plasma NfL are elevated in FTD compared to AD, but with limited utility in discriminating FTD from AD.”
From New developments of biofluid‐based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [87]
Higher levels of both CSF and plasma NfL have been observed in FTD-TDP than in FTD-tau cases, but with high within-group variability.
“For example, higher levels of both CSF and plasma NfL have been observed in FTD‐TDP than in FTD‐tau cases, but with high within‐group variability.”
From New developments of biofluid‐based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [87]
Baseline NfL concentrations in both CSF and blood could reflect the aggressiveness of the disease as it can predict rate of disease progression in the different clinicopathological phenotypes in both sporadic and familial FTD.
“Several studies have already indicated that baseline NfL concentrations in both CSF and blood could reflect the aggressiveness of the disease as it can predict rate of disease progression in the different clinicopathological phenotypes in both sporadic and familial FTD.”
From New developments of biofluid‐based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [87]
Plasma tau appears to be more specific for AD pathology compared to frontotemporal dementia and chronic traumatic encephalopathy, but is increased in prion disease.
“It appears to be more specific for AD pathology, at least compared to frontotemporal dementia and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (85, 91, 92), but it is increased in prion disease (83).”
From All the Tau We Cannot See (2023) · cites this paper as [92]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
MRI count after exclusions does not match subgroup totals
MajorThe text says 15 MRI scans were excluded, so 240 - 15 = 225 should remain. But the subgroup counts listed for the remaining scans add to 240, not 225, so the reported total is inconsistent with its own components.
Reported 225 · recomputed 240
“Fifteen MRIs were excluded from final neuroimaging analyses: 8 because of low image quality (i.e., significant movement artifact) or preprocessing errors and 7 because they were performed in a different MRI scanner.The remaining 225 MRIs (160 FTLD-S, 29 AD-S, and 51 HC) were processed”
FTLD-S-wide t-tau progression finding is contradicted
MajorThe discussion says t-tau did not predict decline in the whole FTLD-S group, but the results report a significant association for that group.
“plasma levels of t-tau only predicted clinical decline in some clinical subgroups of FTLD-S (bvFTD and PSP) but not in the whole FTLD-S and AD-S groups.”
“In FTLD-S, baseline plasma t-tau concentrations were associated with worse decline (3.7 points change in CDR+NACC/FTLD-SB score per log t-tau pg/mL increase per year, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.0, p = 0.006).”
Biomarker units switch from pg/mL to ng/mL for the same median split
MinorOne passage states the median split for high NfL and t-tau using ng/mL, but elsewhere the same biomarkers are reported in pg/mL and the reported values are far smaller. The unit change makes the cutoff inconsistent with the concentrations shown in the tables and results.
“High t-tau and high NfL represent levels superior to 2.2 ng/mL and 42 ng/mL, respectively (median split).”
“t-Tau, pg/mL e , median (Q1, Q3) | 2.2 (1.8, 2.9) ns | 2.5 (1.9, 3.2) ns | 2.2 (1.8, 2.7) ns | p = 0.427”
NfL survival cutoff has conflicting units
MinorThe survival-curve description gives the NfL median-split cutoff as 42 ng/mL, whereas the survival results give it as 42 pg/mL.
“High t-tau and high NfL represent levels superior to 2.2 ng/mL and 42 ng/mL, respectively (median split).”
“FTLD-S participants with high NfL concentrations (≥42 pg/mL) showed increased mortality compared to those with low concentrations (<42 pg/mL, log-rank 14.4, p < 0.001).”
t-tau median-split cutoff has conflicting units
MinorThe survival-curve description gives the t-tau cutoff as 2.2 ng/mL, while the FTLD-S median of 2.2 in the table is expressed in pg/mL.
“High t-tau and high NfL represent levels superior to 2.2 ng/mL and 42 ng/mL, respectively (median split).”
“| t-Tau, pg/mL e , median (Q1, Q3) | 2.2 (1.8, 2.9) ns | 2.5 (1.9, 3.2) ns | 2.2 (1.8, 2.7) ns | p = 0.427 |”
MRI subgroup counts do not match the stated final total
MinorThe listed subgroup counts sum to 240, not 225. They also match the counts given before 15 MRIs were excluded.
Reported 225 · recomputed 240
“The remaining 225 MRIs (160 FTLD-S, 29 AD-S, and 51 HC) were processed with the CAT12 toolbox”
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,010 · see citing works
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589 · see citing works
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,803 · see citing works
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,003 · see citing works
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537 · see citing works
Self-citationEl Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Brooks, B. R., Miller, R. G., Swash, M., & Munsat, T. L. (2000) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders · doi:10.1080/146608200300079536 · Cited by 5,433 · see citing works
Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia
Rascovsky, K., Hodges, J. R., Knopman, D., Mendez, M. F., Kramer, J. H., Neuhaus, J., van Swieten, J. C., Seelaar, H., Dopper, E. G. P., Onyike, C. U., et al. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr179 · Cited by 5,221 · see citing works
Self-citationClassification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821103e6 · Cited by 5,141 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria
Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., Hampel, H., Molinuevo, J. L., Blennow, K., DeKosky, S. T., Gauthier, S., Selkoe, D., Bateman, R., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70090-0 · Cited by 3,321 · see citing works
Self-citationHyman, B. T., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Carrillo, M. C., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., et al. (2012) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 · Cited by 3,092 · see citing works
Montine, T. J., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., Mirra, S. S., et al. (2012) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3 · Cited by 2,992 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AD pathology was classified according to the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the likelihood of ADpathology as low, intermediate, or high.(33) For secondary analyses, we considered that participants with either a positive amyloid PET or at least comorbid AD (as defined by at least int…”
MethodAppelhof, B., Bakker, C., den IJssel, J. C. L. V. D., Zwijsen, S. A., Smalbrugge, M., Verhey, F. R. J., de Vugt, M. E., Zuidema, S. U., & Koopmans, R. T. C. M. (2017) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000477087 · Cited by 2,773 · see citing works
Litvan, I., Agid, Y., Calne, D., Campbell, G., Dubois, B., Duvoisin, R. C., Goetz, C. G., Golbe, L. I., Grafman, J., Growdon, J. H., et al. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.1.1 · Cited by 2,538 · see citing works
Qualitative Assessment of Verbal Fluency Performance in Frontotemporal Dementia
van den Berg, E., Jiskoot, L. C., Grosveld, M. J. H., Swieten, J. C. V., & Papma, J. M. (2017) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000477538 · Cited by 2,061 · see citing works
Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration
Armstrong, M. J., Litvan, I., Lang, A. E., Bak, T. H., Bhatia, K. P., Borroni, B., Boxer, A. L., Dickson, D. W., Grossman, M., Hallett, M., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31827f0fd1 · Cited by 1,904 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation of plasma neurofilament light with neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease
Mattsson, N., Andreasson, U., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & Initiative, F. T. A. D. N. (2017) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
Self-citationMackenzie, I. R. A., Neumann, M., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Alafuzoff, I., Kril, J., Kovacs, G. G., Ghetti, B., Halliday, G., Holm, I. E., et al. (2010) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0612-2 · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh-precision plasma β-amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis
Schindler, S. E., Bollinger, J. G., Ovod, V., Mawuenyega, K. G., Li, Y., Gordon, B. A., Holtzman, D. M., Morris, J. C., Benzinger, T. L. S., Xiong, C., et al. (2019) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000008081 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
Bridel, C., van Wieringen, W. N., Zetterberg, H., Tijms, B. M., Teunissen, C. E., and the NFL Group, Alvarez-Cermeño, J. C., Andreasson, U., Axelsson, M., Bäckström, D. C., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1534 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) investigators, Thijssen, E. H., La Joie, R., Wolf, A., Strom, A., Wang, P., Iaccarino, L., Bourakova, V., Cobigo, Y., Heuer, H., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0762-2 · Cited by 761 · see citing works
Self-citationMattsson, N., Cullen, N. C., Andreasson, U., Zetterberg, H., & Blennow, K. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0765 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Self-citationTau Kinetics in Neurons and the Human Central Nervous System
Sato, C., Barthélemy, N. R., Mawuenyega, K. G., Patterson, B. W., Gordon, B. A., Jockel-Balsarotti, J., Sullivan, M., Crisp, M. J., Kasten, T., Kirmess, K. M., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.015 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Neurofilament light chain: A prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Lu, C.-H., Macdonald-Wallis, C., Gray, E., Pearce, N., Petzold, A., Norgren, N., Giovannoni, G., Fratta, P., Sidle, K., Fish, M., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001642 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Plasma tau in Alzheimer disease
Mattsson, N., Zetterberg, H., Janelidze, S., Insel, P. S., Andreasson, U., Stomrud, E., Palmqvist, S., Baker, D., Tan Hehir, C. A., Jeromin, A., et al. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003246 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of methodology for conducting clinical trials in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Knopman, D. S., Kramer, J. H., Boeve, B. F., Caselli, R. J., Graff-Radford, N. R., Mendez, M. F., Miller, B. L., & Mercaldo, N. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn234 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Self-citationLa Joie, R., Ayakta, N., Seeley, W. W., Borys, E., Boxer, A. L., DeCarli, C., Doré, V., Grinberg, L. T., Huang, E., Hwang, J., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.001 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Self-citationClinicopathological correlations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia
Perry, D. C., Brown, J. A., Possin, K. L., Datta, S., Trujillo, A., Radke, A., Karydas, A., Kornak, J., Sias, A. C., Rabinovici, G. D., et al. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx254 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Self-citationShaw, L. M., Arias, J., Blennow, K., Galasko, D., Molinuevo, J. L., Salloway, S., Schindler, S., Carrillo, M. C., Hendrix, J. A., Ross, A., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.220 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurofilament light chain: a biomarker for genetic frontotemporal dementia
Meeter, L. H., Dopper, E. G., Jiskoot, L. C., Sanchez‐Valle, R., Graff, C., Benussi, L., Ghidoni, R., Pijnenburg, Y. A., Borroni, B., Galimberti, D., et al. (2016) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.325 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Randall, J., Mörtberg, E., Provuncher, G. K., Fournier, D. R., Duffy, D. C., Rubertsson, S., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., & Wilson, D. H. (2013) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.027 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationPlasma neurofilament light chain predicts progression in progressive supranuclear palsy
Rojas, J. C., Karydas, A., Bang, J., Tsai, R. M., Blennow, K., Liman, V., Kramer, J. H., Rosen, H., Miller, B. L., Zetterberg, H., et al. (2016) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.290 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationPase, M. P., Beiser, A., Himali, J. J., Satizábal, C. L., Aparicio, H. J., DeCarli, C. S., Chêne, G., Dufouil, C., & Seshadri, S. S. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4666 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Cytoskeleton proteins in CSF distinguish frontotemporal dementia from AD
Sjögren, M., Rosengren, L., Minthon, L., Davidsson, P., Blennow, K., & Wallin, A. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.10.1960 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationvan der Ende, E. L., Meeter, L. H., Poos, J. M., Panman, J. L., Jiskoot, L. C., Dopper, E. G. P., Papma, J. M., de Jong, F. J., Verberk, I. M. W., Teunissen, C., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30354-0 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Ashton, N. J., Leuzy, A., Lim, Y. M., Troakes, C., Hortobágyi, T., Höglund, K., Aarsland, D., Lovestone, S., Schöll, M., Blennow, K., et al. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-018-0649-3 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationCicognola, C., Brinkmalm, G., Wahlgren, J., Portelius, E., Gobom, J., Cullen, N. C., Hansson, O., Parnetti, L., Constantinescu, R., Wildsmith, K., et al. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1948-2 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citationMiyagawa, T., Brushaber, D. E., Syrjanen, J. A., Kremers, W. K., Fields, J. A., Forsberg, L. K., Heuer, H. W., Knopman, D. S., Kornak, J., Boxer, A. L., et al. (2020) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12033 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationReview: Tau in biofluids – relation to pathology, imaging and clinical features
Zetterberg, H. (2017) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12378 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationTau Kinetics in Neurons and the Human Central Nervous System
Sato, C., Barthélemy, N. R., Mawuenyega, K. G., Patterson, B. W., Gordon, B. A., Jockel-Balsarotti, J., Sullivan, M., Crisp, M. J., Kasten, T., Kirmess, K. M., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.035 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Serum neurofilament light chain in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Steinacker, P., Anderl-Straub, S., Diehl-Schmid, J., Semler, E., Uttner, I., von Arnim, C. A. F., Barthel, H., Danek, A., Fassbender, K., Fliessbach, K., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000006318 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
CSF neurofilament light chain and phosphorylated tau 181 predict disease progression in PSP
Rojas, J. C., Bang, J., Lobach, I. V., Tsai, R. M., Rabinovici, G. D., Miller, B. L., Boxer, A. L., AL-108-231 Investigators, Williams, D. R., Lafontaine, A. L., et al. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004859 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationCerebrospinal fluid tau fragment correlates with tau PET: a candidate biomarker for tangle pathology
Blennow, K., Chen, C., Cicognola, C., Wildsmith, K. R., Manser, P. T., Bohorquez, S. M. S., Zhang, Z., Xie, B., Peng, J., Hansson, O., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz346 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationStaffaroni, A. M., Kramer, A. O., Casey, M., Kang, H., Rojas, J. C., Orrú, C. D., Caughey, B., Allen, I. E., Kramer, J. H., Rosen, H. J., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1071 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationPhosphorylated Tau as a Candidate Biomarker for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Grossman, M., Elman, L., McCluskey, L., McMillan, C. T., Boller, A., Powers, J., Rascovsky, K., Hu, W., Shaw, L., Irwin, D. J., et al. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.6064 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Wattmo, C., Blennow, K., & Hansson, O. (2020) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-019-1591-0 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationPijnenburg, Y. A. L., Verwey, N. A., van der Flier, W. M., Scheltens, P., & Teunissen, C. E. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2015.11.001 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Neurofilament as a blood marker for diagnosis and monitoring of primary progressive aphasias
Steinacker, P., Semler, E., Anderl‐Straub, S., Diehl‐Schmid, J., Schroeter, M. L., Uttner, I., Foerstl, H., Landwehrmeyer, G. B., Arnim, C. A. F. V., Kassubek, J., et al. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003688 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
A 2-Step Cerebrospinal Algorithm for the Selection of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Subtypes
Lleó, A., Irwin, D. J., Illán-Gala, I., McMillan, C. T., Wolk, D. A., Lee, E. B., Van Deerlin, V. M., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Grossman, M. (2018) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0118 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationIrwin, D. J., Lleó, A., Xie, S. X., McMillan, C. T., Wolk, D. A., Lee, E. B., Van Deerlin, V. M., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Grossman, M. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24996 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationPlasma tau is increased in frontotemporal dementia
Foiani, M. S., Woollacott, I. O., Heller, C., Bocchetta, M., Heslegrave, A., Dick, K. M., Russell, L. L., Marshall, C. R., Mead, S., Schott, J. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-317260 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationChallenges associated with biomarker‐based classification systems for Alzheimer's disease
Illán‐Gala, I., Pegueroles, J., Montal, V., Vilaplana, E., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Alcolea, D., Dickerson, B. C., Sánchez‐Valle, R., de Leon, M. J., Blesa, R., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2018.03.004 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationCerebrospinal fluid biomarkers predict frontotemporal dementia trajectory
Ljubenkov, P. A., Staffaroni, A. M., Rojas, J. C., Allen, I. E., Wang, P., Heuer, H., Karydas, A., Kornak, J., Cobigo, Y., Seeley, W. W., et al. (2018) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.643 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationPlasma tau correlates with basal forebrain atrophy rates in people at risk for Alzheimer disease
(2019) · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000008696 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical value of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain in semantic dementia
Meeter, L. H. H., Steketee, R. M. E., Salkovic, D., Vos, M. E., Grossman, M., McMillan, C. T., Irwin, D. J., Boxer, A. L., Rojas, J. C., Olney, N. T., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2018-319784 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationP2‐230: CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH BIOMARKER‐BASED CLASSIFICATIONS SYSTEMS FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE
Illán‐Gala, I., Pegueroles, J., Montal, V., Vilaplana, E., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Alcolea, D. A., Sánchez‐Valle, R., de Leon, M. J., Blesa, R., Lleó, A., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.917
Self-citationPhosphorylated Tau Is a Candidate Biomarker for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (P1.088)
Grossman, M., Elman, L. B., McCluskey, L. F., McMillan, C. T., Boller, A., Powers, J., Rascovsky, K., Hu, W. T., Shaw, L. M. J., Irwin, D. J., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.82.10_supplement.p1.088
Shaw, L. M. J., Arias, J. J., Blennow, K., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.010
Self-citationPlasma Neurofilament Light Chain Predicts Progression in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (S39.005)
-Martinez, J. R., Karydas, A., Bang, J., et al. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.86.16_supplement.s39.005
Self-citationCSF neurofilament-light chain and phosphorylated-tau predict disease progression in PSP (P4.176)
Rojas, J., Bang, J., Lobach, I., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.90.15_supplement.p4.176
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gaser C, Robert D. Computational Anatomy Toolbox [online]. Available at neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/. Accessed August 16, 2020.
- Friston K, Ashburner J. Statistical Parametric Mapping [online]. Available at fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/. Accessed August 16, 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: towards clinical implementation
Teunissen, C. E., Verberk, I. M. W., Thijssen, E. H., Vermunt, L., Hansson, O., Zetterberg, H., van der Flier, W. M., Mielke, M. M., & del Campo, M. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00361-6 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
Self-citationBlood‐based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease
Leuzy, A., Mattsson, N., Palmqvist, S., Janelidze, S., Dage, J. L., & Hansson, O. (2021) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.202114408 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Tauopathies: new perspectives and challenges
Zhang, Y., Wu, K.-M., Yang, L., Dong, Q., & Yu, J.-T. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00533-z · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Plasma proteomic profiles predict future dementia in healthy adults
Guo, Y., You, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y.-R., Zhang, W., Dong, Q., Feng, J., Cheng, W., et al. (2024) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00565-0 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Boeve, B. F., Boxer, A. L., Kumfor, F., Pijnenburg, Y., & Rohrer, J. D. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00341-0 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurofilament Light Chain as Biomarker for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
Verde, F., Otto, M., & Silani, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.679199 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Temporal order of clinical and biomarker changes in familial frontotemporal dementia
Staffaroni, A. M., Quintana, M., Wendelberger, B., Heuer, H. W., Russell, L. L., Cobigo, Y., Wolf, A., Goh, S.-Y. M., Petrucelli, L., Gendron, T. F., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01942-9 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationArranz, J., Zhu, N., Rubio‐Guerra, S., Rodríguez‐Baz, Í., Ferrer, R., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Barroeta, I., Illán‐Gala, I., Santos‐Santos, M., Fortea, J., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-024-01513-9 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationFrontotemporal Dementia, Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review
Antonioni, A., Raho, E. M., Lopriore, P., Pace, A. P., Latino, R. R., Assogna, M., Mancuso, M., Gragnaniello, D., Granieri, E., Pugliatti, M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241411732 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The potential of blood neurofilament light as a marker of neurodegeneration for Alzheimer's disease
Jung, Y., & Damoiseaux, J. S. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad267 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia
Thijssen, E. H., Verberk, I. M. W., Kindermans, J., Abramian, A., Vanbrabant, J., Ball, A. J., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Lemstra, A. W., van der Flier, W. M., Stoops, E., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1002/dad2.12285 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Alzheimer’s disease – the journey of a healthy brain into organ failure
Golde, T. E. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00523-1 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
The therapeutic landscape of tauopathies: challenges and prospects
Cummings, J. L., González, M. I., Pritchard, M. C., May, P. C., Toledo, L. M., & Harris, G. A. (2023) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-023-01321-7 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Plasma biomarker profiles in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease
Johansson, C., Þórðardóttir, S., Laffita‐Mesa, J. M., Rodriguez‐Vieitez, E., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & Graff, C. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac399 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationBlanco, K., Salcidua, S., Orellana, P., Sauma-Pérez, T., León, T., Steinmetz, L. C. L., Ibañez, A., Duran-Aniotz, C., & de la Cruz, R. (2023) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-023-01304-8 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Developments in scalable strategies for detecting early markers of cognitive decline
Whelan, R., Barbey, F. M., Cominetti, M. R., Gillan, C. M., & Rosická, A. M. (2022) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-022-02237-w · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Sarto, J., Ruiz-García, R., Guillén, N., Ramos-Campoy, Ó., Falgàs, N., Esteller, D., Contador, J., Fernández, G., González, Y., Tort-Merino, A., et al. (2023) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000201597 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Use of plasma biomarkers for AT(N) classification of neurodegenerative dementias
Alcolea, D. A., Delaby, C., Muñoz, L., Torres, S., Estellés, T., Zhu, N., Barroeta, I., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Illán‐Gala, I., Santos‐Santos, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2021-326603 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationLiang, Y., Liu, C., Cheng, M., Geng, L., Li, J., Du, W., Song, M., Chen, N., Yeleen, T. A. N., Li, S., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14057 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
From Recognition to Remedy: The Significance of Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Disease Pathology
Toader, C., Dobrin, N., Brehar, F.-M., Popa, C., Covache-Busuioc, R.-A., Glavan, L.-A., Costin, H. P., Bratu, B.-G., Corlatescu, A.-D., Popa, A. A., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242216119 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Elevated Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 181 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Cousins, K. A. Q., Shaw, L. M. J., Shellikeri, S., Dratch, L., Rosario, L., Elman, L. B., Quinn, C. C., Amado, D. A., Wolk, D. A., Tropea, T. F., et al. (2022) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.26462 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders
Zetterberg, H., & Schott, J. M. (2022) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/ane.13628 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationdel Campo, M., Zetterberg, H., Gandy, S., Onyike, C. U., Oliveira, F., Udeh‐Momoh, C., Lleó, A., Teunissen, C. E., & Pijnenburg, Y. (2022) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12643 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationDistinguishing Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Tau From TDP-43 Using Plasma Biomarkers
Cousins, K. A. Q., Shaw, L. M. J., Chen‐Plotkin, A. S., Wolk, D. A., Deerlin, V. M. V., Lee, E. B., McMillan, C. T., Grossman, M., & Irwin, D. J. (2022) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3265 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Promising Blood Biomarkers for Clinical Use in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Focused Update
Park, S. A., Jang, Y. J., Kim, M. K., Lee, S. M., & Moon, S. Y. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.401 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Wu, X. Y., Xiao, Z., Yi, J., Ding, S., Gu, H., Wu, W., Luo, J., Liang, X., Zheng, L., Xu, H. Y., et al. (2021) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvab192 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
VandeVrede, L. A., Joie, R. L., Thijssen, E. H., Asken, B. M., Vento, S. A., Tsuei, T., Baker, S. L., Cobigo, Y., Fonseca, C. S., Heuer, H. W., et al. (2023) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0488 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationFrank, B. E., Ally, M., Brekke, B., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Sugarman, M. A., Ashton, N. J., Karikari, T. K., Tripodis, Y., Martin, B. M., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12508 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationA new generation of AD biomarkers: 2019 to 2021
Hawksworth, J. I., Fernández, E., & Gevaert, K. (2022) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2022.101654 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Alzheimer's disease neuropathology and its estimation with fluid and imaging biomarkers
Thal, D. R., Poesen, K., Vandenberghe, R. R., & Meyer, S. D. (2025) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-025-00819-y · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Hyman, B. (2023) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-042921-023749 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Franzen, S., Nuytemans, K., Bourdage, R., Caramelli, P., Ellajosyula, R., Finger, E. C., Illán‐Gala, I., Loi, S. M., Morhardt, D., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13129 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Tau beyond Alzheimer’s Disease: A Narrative Review
Virgilio, E., Marchi, F. D., Contaldi, E., Dianzani, U., Cantello, R. M., Mazzini, L., & Comi, C. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines10040760 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, S., Xiao, J., Huang, C., & Sun, J. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27977-7 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Gu, Y., Honig, L. S., Kang, M. S., Bahl, A., Sanchez, D. L., Reyes‐Dumeyer, D., Manly, J. J., Dage, J. L., Lantigua, R., Brickman, A. M., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13652 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Álvarez-Sánchez, L., Peña-Bautista, C., Ferré-González, L., Balaguer, A., Baquero, M., Casanova-Estruch, B., & Cháfer-Pericás, C. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24021226 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Sun, Q., Ni, J., Wei, M., Long, S., Li, T., Fan, D., Lü, T., Shi, J., & Tian, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.963845 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A critical appraisal of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease
Lista, S., Mapstone, M. E., Caraci, F., Emanuele, E., López‐Ortiz, S., Martín-Hernández, J., Triaca, V., Imbimbo, C., Gabelle, A., Mielke, M. M., et al. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102290 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Nabizadeh, F., Balabandian, M., Rostami, M. R., Kankam, S. B., Ranjbaran, F., Pourhamzeh, M., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2022) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-022-02095-y · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Tsoy, E., Joie, R. L., VandeVrede, L. A., Rojas, J. C., Yballa, C., Chan, B., Lago, A. L., Rodriguez, A., Goode, C. A., Erlhoff, S. J., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13686 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationFan, Z., Liu, X., Liu, J., Chen, C., & Zhou, M. (2023) · Journal of Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.31083/j.jin2204085 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Götze, K., Vrillon, A., Dumurgier, J., Indart, S., Ortiz, M. S., Slimi, H., Raynaud-Simon, A., Cognat, E., Martinet, M., Zetterberg, H., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-024-01593-7 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurofilaments Light Chain in Neurodegenerative Dementias: A Review of Imaging Correlates
Gallingani, C., Carbone, C., Tondelli, M., & Zamboni, G. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14030272 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
Benussi, A., Ashton, N. J., Karikari, T. K., Alberici, A., Saraceno, C., Ghidoni, R., Benussi, L., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & Borroni, B. (2021) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationArroyo-Pereiro, P., Muñoz‐Vendrell, A., León, I., Bau, L., Matas, E., Romero-Pinel, L., Martı́nez-Yélamos, A., Martínez‐Yélamos, S., & Andrés‐Benito, P. (2023) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-023-12135-w · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Rajan, K. B., McAninch, E. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Barnes, L. L., Wilson, R. S., Weuve, J., DeCarli, C. S., & Evans, D. A. (2022) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000201289 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Selma‐González, J., Rubio‐Guerra, S., Castro, J. G., Vera-Campuzano, E., Sala, I., Sánchez‐Saudinós, M. B., Zhu, N., Arranz, J., Arriola‐Infante, J. E., Rodríguez‐Baz, Í., et al. (2025) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000213769 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationPresence of Preoperative Neurodegeneration Biofluid Markers in Patients with Postoperative Delirium
Leung, J. M., Rojas, J. C., Tang, C., Chan, B., Lario‐Lago, A., Boxer, A. L., Do, Q., Kramer, J. H., Du, Z., Du, P., et al. (2023) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000004666 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationTau proteins in blood as biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease and other proteinopathies
Verde, F. (2022) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-022-02471-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Dementia: A Systematic Review
Santos, F., Cabreira, V., Rocha, S., & Massano, J. (2023) · Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology · doi:10.1177/08919887221141651 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-H., Lin, R.-R., Huang, H.-F., Xue, Y., & Tao, Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.848180 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Solje, E., Benussi, A., Buratti, E., Remes, A. M., Haapasalo, A., & Borroni, B. (2021) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11050788 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Progress in blood biomarkers of subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease
Yu, X., Shao, K., Wan, K., Li, T., Li, Y., Zhu, X., & Han, Y. (2023) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000002566 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Álvarez‐Sánchez, L., Peña‐Bautista, C., Baquero, M., & Cháfer‐Pericás, C. (2022) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-215093 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Present and Future of Blood-Based Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease: Beyond the Classics
Grigoli, M. M., Pelegrini, L. N. D. C., Whelan, R., & Cominetti, M. R. (2024) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148812 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Tao, Q., Lu, P., Meng, F., Zhuang, L., Qiao, S., Zhang, Y., Luo, B., Liu, Y., et al. (2024) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2024.118784 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Huang, Y., Li, Y., Xie, F., & Guo, Q. (2022) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.13962 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Moses, J., Sinclair, B., Schwartz, D. L., Silbert, L. C., O'Brien, T. J., Law, M., & Vivash, L. E. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1003522 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Martínez‐Dubarbie, F., Guerra-Ruiz, A. R., López‐García, S., Lage, C., Fernández‐Matarrubia, M., Nevado-Cáceres, Á., Rivera‐Sánchez, M., Barrero, A. V., Pozueta‐Cantudo, A., García‐Martínez, M., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-025-01719-5 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ni, M., Zhu, Z., Gao, F., Dai, L., Lv, X., Wang, Q., Zhu, X., Xie, J.-K., Shen, Y., Wang, S., et al. (2022) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00636 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Galectin‐3 is upregulated in frontotemporal dementia patients with subtype specificity
Borrego‐Écija, S., Pérez‐Millan, A., Antonell, A., Fort‐Aznar, L., Tilki, E. K., León‐Halcón, A., Lladó, A., Molina‐Porcel, L., Balasa, M., Juncà‐Parella, J., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13536 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Mitolo, M., Lombardi, G., Manca, R., Nacmias, B., & Venneri, A. (2024) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-024-12674-w · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The role of neurofilament light in genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Zetterberg, H., Teunissen, C., van Swieten, J., Kuhle, J., Boxer, A., Rohrer, J. D., Mitic, L., Nicholson, A. M., Pearlman, R., McCaughey, S. M., et al. (2022) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac310 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationBlood-Based Biomarkers in Frontotemporal Dementia: A Narrative Review
Liampas, I., Kyriakoulopoulou, P., Karakoida, V., Kavvoura, P. A., Sgantzos, M. N., Bogdanos, D. P., Stamati, P., Dardiotis, E., & Siokas, V. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms252111838 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Fang, T., Dai, Y., Hu, X., Xu, Y., & Qiao, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1320653 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Graff‐Radford, J., Mielke, M. M., Hofrenning, E. I., Kouri, N., Lesnick, T. G., Moloney, C. M., Rabinstein, A. A., Cabrera-Rodriguez, J. N., Rothberg, D. M., Przybelski, S. A., et al. (2022) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.07.006 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Fang, L., Jiao, B., Liu, X., Wang, Z., Yuan, P., Zhou, H., Xiao, X., Cao, L., Guo, J., Tang, B., et al. (2023) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.018 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Is liquid biopsy mature enough for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease?
Gong, X., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Fapohunda, F. O., Lü, P., Wang, K., & Tang, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.977999 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Arranz, J., Zhu, N., Rubio‐Guerra, S., Rodríguez‐Baz, Í., Ferrer, R., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Barroeta, I., Illán‐Gala, I., Santos‐Santos, M., Fortea, J., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3725688/v1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationNuytemans, K., Franzen, S., Broce, I., Caramelli, P., Ellajosyula, R., Finger, E. C., Gupta, V. B., Gupta, V., Illán‐Gala, I., Loi, S. M., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14312 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationCianflone, A., Coppola, L., Mirabelli, P., & Salvatore, M. (2021) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-210496 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Performance of plasma p‐tau217 and NfL in an unselected memory clinic setting
Rousset, R. Z., Claessen, T., van Harten, A. C., Lemstra, A. W., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., van der Flier, W. M., den Braber, A., Jeromin, A., Verberk, I. M. W., & Teunissen, C. E. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1002/dad2.70003 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Serum neurofilament light concentrations are associated with cortical thinning in anorexia nervosa
Hellerhoff, I., Bernardoni, F., Bahnsen, K., King, J. A., Doose, A., Pauligk, S., Tam, F. I., Mannigel, M., Gramatke, K., Roessner, V., et al. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291723000387 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Sex differences in the clinical manifestation of autosomal dominant frontotemporal dementia
Memel, M., Staffaroni, A. M., Illán‐Gala, I., Castro, J. G., Kornak, J., Tartaglia, M. C., Saloner, R., VandeBunte, A. M., Paolillo, E. W., Cadwallader, C. J., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14630 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation of APOE ε4/ε4 with fluid biomarkers in patients from the PUMCH dementia cohort
Shang, L., Dong, L., Huang, X., Wang, T., Mao, C., Li, J., Wang, J., Liu, C., & Gao, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1119070 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Vivash, L. E., Malpas, C. B., Meletis, C., Gollant, M., Eratne, D., Li, Q., McDonald, S. J., O’Brien, W. T., Brodtmann, A. G., Darby, D., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1002/trc2.12299 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Blood biomarkers for clinical applications in Alzheimer's disease: A narrative review
Li, H., & Wang, Z. (2025) · NeuroMarkers. · doi:10.1016/j.neumar.2025.100078 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Peng, L., Wan, L., Liu, M., Long, Z., Chen, D., Yuan, X., Tang, Z., Fu, Y., Zhu, S., Lei, L., et al. (2023) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-023-11741-y · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Learning about Voice Search for Spoken Dialogue Systems
Passonneau, R. J., Epstein, S. L., Ligorio, T., Gordon, J. B., & Bhutada, P. (2010) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia
Boeve, B. F. (2022) · CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology · doi:10.1212/con.0000000000001105 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Das, S., van Engelen, M.-P. E., Goossens, J., Jacobs, D., Bongers, B., Fieldhouse, J. L. P., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Teunissen, C. E., Vanmechelen, E., & Verberk, I. M. W. (2024) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-024-01409-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Elmers, J., Colzato, L. S., Akgün, K., Ziemssen, T., & Beste, C. (2023) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2023.102037 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cardiovascular Health and Biomarkers of Neurodegenerative Disease in Older Adults
Dhana, A., DeCarli, C. S., Dhana, K., Desai, P., Ng, T. K. S., Evans, D. A., & Rajan, K. B. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0527 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Clark, D. G. (2024) · CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology · doi:10.1212/con.0000000000001506 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Li, L., Che, P., Liu, D., Wang, Y., Li, J., He, D., Liu, T., & Zhang, N. (2025) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100092 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Sievert, T., Didriksson, I., Spångfors, M., Lilja, G., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Frigyesi, A., & Friberg, H. (2023) · Intensive Care Medicine Experimental · doi:10.1186/s40635-023-00547-x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationGong, J., Williams, D. M., Scholes, S., Assaad, S., Bu, F., Hayat, S. A., Zaninotto, P., & Steptoe, A. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.06.04.24308415 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Recent Advances Towards Diagnosis and Therapeutic Fingerprinting for Alzheimer’s Disease
Pradhan, L. K., Sahoo, P. K., Chauhan, S., & Das, S. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s12031-022-02009-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Unraveling the role of proteins in dementia: insights from two UK cohorts with causal evidence
Gong, J., Williams, D. M., Scholes, S., Assaad, S., Bu, F., Hayat, S. A., Zaninotto, P., & Steptoe, A. (2025) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf097 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Wang, N., Ma, Y., Liang, X., Fa, W., Tian, X., Liu, C., Zhu, M., Tian, N., Liu, K., Tang, S., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/ene.16488 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Unravelling the plasma proteome: Pioneering biomarkers for differential dementia diagnosis
Gezegen, H., Alaylıoğlu, M., Şahin, E., Swann, O., Veleva, E., Güven, G., Yaman, Ü., Salih, D. A. M., Bılgıç, B., Hanağası, H. A., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70162 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationDuran-Castells, C., Prats, A., Oriol-Tordera, B., Llano, A., Gálvez, C., Martínez‐Picado, J., Ballana, E., García-Vidal, E., Clotet, B., Muñoz-Moreno, J. A., et al. (2023) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104732 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Lin, Y., Lin, Y., Hong, W., Kuan, Y., Wu, K.-Y., Hsu, J., Wang, P., Pai, M., Chen, C., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Formosan Medical Association · doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2024.01.018 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Gunasekaran, T. I., Sanchez, D. L., Reyes‐Dumeyer, D., Ventura, R., Morales, C. D., Alshikho, M. J., Lee, A., Lantigua, R., Gu, Y., Honig, L. S., et al. (2025) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.70006 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Early Alzheimer’s Disease Screening Approach Using Plasma Biomarkers
Álvarez‐Sánchez, L., Peña‐Bautista, C., Ferré‐González, L., Cubas-Núñez, L., Balaguer, Á., Casanova-Estruch, B., Baquero, M., & Cháfer‐Pericás, C. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241814151 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sun, W., Ye, S., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Che, P., Chen, J., & Zhang, N. (2025) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf094 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Jin, Y., Hu, Z., Qiu, M., Li, D., Cai, Q., Tao, C., Lou, D., Qi, L., Chen, S., et al. (2023) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-022-01507-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Clinical features and biomarkers of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia with MAPT mutation
Xu, J., Xia, Y., Meng, M., Liu, F., Che, P., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Cai, L., Qin, W., & Zhang, N. (2023) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-023-01176-y · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Associations of plasma biomarkers with cerebral perfusion and structure in Alzheimer’s disease
He, Y., Liu, X., Liu, F., Che, P., Zhang, Y., Fan, R., Li, Y., Qin, W., & Zhang, N. (2025) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-024-03220-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Chong, J. S. X., Tan, Y. J., Koh, A. J., Ting, S. K. S., Kandiah, N., Ng, A. S. L., & Zhou, J. H. (2024) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-231251 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Illán-Gala, I., Lleo, A., Karydas, A., Staffaroni, A. M., Zetterberg, H., Sivasankaran, R., Grinberg, L. T., Spina, S., Kramer, J. H., Ramos, E. M., Coppola, G., La Joie, R., Rabinovici, G. D., Perry, D. C., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Seeley, W. W., Miller, B. L., Rosen, H. J., Blennow, K., Boxer, A. L., & Rojas, J. C.
- Affiliations
- From the Sant Pau Memory Unit, Department of Neurology (I.I.-G., A.L.), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Memory and Aging Center (A.K., A.M.S., L.T.G., S.S., J.H.K., R.L.J., G.D.R., D.C.P., M.L.G.-T., W.W.S., B.L.M., H.J.R., A.L.B., J.C.R.), Department of Neurology (I.I.-G.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z., K.B.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology,...
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2021-02-02
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e671-e683
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC7884995
- OpenAlex
- W3106237074
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- neurofilament light chain, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer's disease, FTLD-TDP, FTLD-tau, plasma biomarkers, Simoa, survival prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review