Cited by 55Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Association of Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase–Activating Polypeptide With Cognitive Decline in Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer Disease

Open access
Han, Pengcheng, Caselli, Richard J., Baxter, Leslie, Serrano, Geidy, Yin, Junxiang, Beach, Thomas G., Reiman, Eric M., Shi, Jiong·2015·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: There is a deficit of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in patients with neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer dementia. However, whether this deficit is associated with the earlier stages of Alzheimer disease (AD) is unknown. This study was conducted to clarify the association between PACAP biomarkers and preclinical, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia stages of AD in postmortem brain tissue. OBJECTIVES: To examine PACAP and PACAP receptor levels in postmortem brain tissues and cerebrospinal fluid from cognitively and neuropathologically normal control individuals, patients with MCI due to AD (MCI-AD), and individuals with AD; analyze the relationship between PACAP, cognitive, and pathologic features; and propose a model to assess these relationships. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We measured PACAP and its receptor (PAC1) levels using enzyme-linked immunoassay. A total of 35 cases were included. All the brain tissue and cerebrospinal fluid samples were selected from Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program. All cognitive test results were in record with the Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A comparison of PACAP and PAC1 levels among the healthy controls, MCI-AD, and AD dementia groups, as well as a systematic correlation analysis between PACAP level, cognitive performance, and pathologic severity. RESULTS: The PACAP levels in cerebrospinal fluid, the superior frontal gyrus, and the middle temporal gyrus were inversely related to dementia severity. The PACAP levels in cerebrospinal fluid correlated with the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale score (Pearson r = 0.50; P = .03) and inversely correlated with total amyloid plaques (Pearson r = -0.48; P < .01) and tangles (Pearson r = -0.55; P = .01) in the brain. The PACAP in the superior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus correlated with the Stroop Color-Word Interference Test (Pearson r = 0.58; P < .01) and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test-Total Learning (Pearson r = 0.33; P = .02), respectively. The PACAP in the primary visual cortex did not correlate with the Judgment of Line orientation test (P = .14). Furthermore, the PAC1 level in the superior frontal gyrus showed an upregulation in MCI-AD but not in AD. The pharmacodynamic model of the PACAP-PAC1 interaction best predicted cognitive function in the superior frontal gyrus, but it was less predictive in the middle temporal gyrus and failed to be predictive in the primary visual cortex. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Deficits in PACAP are associated with clinical severity in the MCI and dementia stages of AD. Additional studies are needed to clarify the role of PACAP deficits in the predisposition to, pathogenesis of, and treatment of AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3625

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, P., Caselli, R. J., Baxter, L., Serrano, G., Yin, J., Beach, T. G., Reiman, E. M., & Shi, J.
Affiliations
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US)
  • Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shi, Jiong
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2015-03-01
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
333
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032994377
Cited by
55
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30-AG-19610, P30AG019610)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, PACAP, PAC1 receptor, Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, dementia severity, postmortem brain, superior frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Biomarkers, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review