CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 606Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Association of Delirium With Long-term Cognitive Decline: A Meta-analysis

Open access
Goldberg, Terry E., Chen, Chen, Wang, Yuanjia, Jung, Eunice, Swanson, Antoinette, Ing, Caleb, Garcia, Paul S., Whittington, Robert A., Moitra, Vivek·2020·JAMA Neurology
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2273PMC PMC7358977
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Importance: Delirium is associated with increased hospital costs, health care complications, and increased mortality. Long-term consequences of delirium on cognition have not been synthesized and quantified via meta-analysis. Objective: To determine if an episode of delirium was an independent risk factor for long-term cognitive decline, and if it was, whether it was causative or an epiphenomenon in already compromised individuals. Data Sources: A systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted from January 1, 1965, to December 31, 2018. A systematic review guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses was conducted. Search terms included delirium AND postoperative cognitive dysfunction; delirium and cognitive decline; delirium AND dementia; and delirium AND memory. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria for studies included contrast between groups with delirium and without delirium; an objective continuous or binary measure of cognitive outcome; a final time point of 3 or more months after the delirium episode. The electronic search was conducted according to established methodologies and was executed on October 17, 2018. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Three authors extracted data on individual characteristics, study design, and outcome, followed by a second independent check on outcome measures. Effect sizes were calculated as Hedges g. If necessary, binary outcomes were also converted to g. Only a single effect size was calculated for each study. Main Outcomes and Measures: The planned main outcome was magnitude of cognitive decline in Hedges g effect size in delirium groups when contrasted with groups that did not experience delirium. Results: Of 1583 articles, data subjected from the 24 studies (including 3562 patients who experienced delirium and 6987 controls who did not) were included in a random-effects meta-analysis for pooled effect estimates and random-effects meta-regressions to identify sources of study variance. One study was excluded as an outlier. There was a significant association between delirium and long-term cognitive decline, as the estimated effect size (Hedges g) for 23 studies was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.34-0.57; P < .001). In all studies, the group that experienced delirium had worse cognition at the final time point. The I2 measure of between-study variability in g was 0.81. A multivariable meta-regression suggested that duration of follow-up (longer with larger gs), number of covariates controlled (greater numbers were associated with smaller gs), and baseline cognitive matching (matching was associated with larger gs) were significant sources of variance. More specialized subgroup and meta-regressions were consistent with predictions that suggested that delirium may be a causative factor in cognitive decline. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, delirium was significantly associated with long-term cognitive decline in both surgical and nonsurgical patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2273

Cites

48 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 605

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Goldberg, T. E., Chen, C., Wang, Y., Jung, E., Swanson, A., Ing, C., Garcia, P. S., Whittington, R. A., & Moitra, V.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Terry E.
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
77
Issue
11
Pages
1373
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2273
PMC
PMC7358977
OpenAlex
W3042096137
Cited by
606
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 133 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 7
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Keywords
del delirium, long-term cognitive decline, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, dementia, memory impairment, risk factors, causality, follow-up duration, delirium severity, delirium duration, delirium management, delirium prevention, delirium education, delirium screening, delirium monitoring
MeSH terms
Delirium, Humans, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Risk Factors, Cognitive Dysfunction, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review